Category: USA

#59. La Stampa (Italy) Interviews Ivan Katchanovski: Russia-Ukraine War and Peace

La Stampa 1 (Italy) Interview Concerning the Russia-Ukraine War and Peace
Published version in La Stampa (In Italian), July 28, 2026
Published English version: August 25, 2026
On: Substack
By: Ivan Katchanovski

Orlando Trinchi: Trump-Zelensky meeting: what do you expect?

Professor Ivan Katchanovski: Trump can be often unexpected and often changes his public views, in particular, concerning the Russia-Ukraine war and its peaceful resolution. I do not expect any viable peace agreement as a result of his meeting with Zelensky. Russia repeatedly stated that they would not accept any ceasefire unless Zelensky would agree to withdrawal of the Ukrainian forces from the remaining part of Donbas.

Orlando Trinchi: In your opinion, will new negotiations open to finally end the conflict in Ukraine?

Professor Ivan Katchanovski: The chances of ending the war in Ukraine via a peace deal are less than the chances of the continuation of the war until at least the end of this year. Putin and other Russian officials state that Russia can end the war on the terms of the informal peace agreement between Trump and Putin at the Anchorage summit. Withdrawal of the Ukrainian forces from all of Donbas and no NATO membership of Ukraine are key parts that reflect Russian demands. However, Zelensky and leaders of the UK, France, Germany and other European countries refused to accept it and proposed a peace deal on their terms, which are unacceptable to Russia. Marco Rubio-led Neocon faction of the Trump administration basically did the same and apparently persuaded Trump, at least for now, to do the same.

Orlando Trinchi: Donald Trump has guaranteed that Kiev will be granted a license to produce Patriot missiles. Do you think the US stance toward Ukraine has become more accommodating?

Professor Ivan Katchanovski: The Trump decision actually means refusal to sell the Patriot missiles to Ukraine via the NATO countries. The licensing of the Patriot missiles is unlikely to produce such missiles in Ukraine for a year or more. But Trump became more accommodating to Zelensky. He refused to use the leverage that the US has over Zelensky and Ukraine to compel them to accept the peace deal on the terms that were informally agreed by Trump and Putin in Anchorage. Trump also authorized the CIA to provide US intelligence and guidance for the Ukrainian long-range drone and missile strikes targeting the Russian oil refineries and Moscow and Saint Petersburg.

Orlando Trinchi: There has been a change in military leadership, with Fedorov and Syrsky replaced, but the protests aren’t calming down. What do you think?

Professor Ivan Katchanovski: These relatively small protests demand that Zelensky reinstated Fedorov as the minister of defence. Zelensky is unlikely to do this because he sacked the entire cabinet to get rid of Fedorov, his long-term associate whom he now regards as his potential rival for presidency. Zelensky wants to eliminate any potential challengers for his rule Ukraine.

Orlando Trinchi: How do you assess the course of the conflict for the parties involved?

Professor Ivan Katchanovski: The Ukrainian forces this year launched a limited counteroffensive and were able to recapture some territory. Russian territorial advanced slowed down considerably this year compared to the previous one. But Russia still advances and captures more territory, in particular, Kostiantynivka, and approaches Sloviansk and Kramatorsk in Donbas. The Ukrainian drone strikes damaged significant number of Russian oil facilities. But they could not halt Russian oil production, refinement, and export. Russian oil revenues, including taxes from the oil extraction, increased significantly because of the oil prices jump as result of the US and Israel’s’ war with Iran and blocking of the Strait of Hormuz by Iran in response.

The claims and limited Ukrainian advances and long-range strikes are used to create the alternative reality in Ukraine and the West that Ukraine turned the tide of the war and winning the war. This this done to propagate the continuation of the unwinnable war for Ukraine.

Russia by all measures is winning the war with Ukraine, which is also a proxy war with NATO. It controls close to 20 percent of the territory of Ukraine and has escalation dominance. As my open access book “The Russia-Ukraine War and its Origins” shows, the war is likely to end with a partial defeat of Ukraine.

Ukraine has advantage of using NATO countries as its weapons production, supply, and repair base, which is safe, at least for now, from the Russian strikes. Russia is likely again to target power plants and powers substations when the winter approaches. Russia will try to achieve its major war goal of capturing the territory of the entire Donbas.

But the size of the territory captured is not an accurate measure of the state of war of attrition. Relative military casualties are more important. My new in press book 2 estimates that at least 230,000 Russian and Donbas separatist forces members and around 250,000 Ukrainian forces members were killed during the Russia-Ukraine war. This estimate is based on killed and missing in action individuals identified by name by BBC Russian and Mediazona and the Ualosses site and adjusted for undercounting gaps to make them more comparable. The Zelensky government relies on forced mobilization. Thousands of videos posted by Ukrainians on the social media show use of force by military draft officers to mobilize men in by snatching them on the streets, in stores, buses, parks, homes, workplaces, etc.

Substack

Footnotes

  1. La Stampa (lit. ’The Press’) is an Italian daily newspaper. Headquartered in Turin and owned by the Agnelli family, La Stampa is one of Italy’s oldest and most prominent national newspapers. (Wikipedia) ↩︎
  2. An earlier version (2013) was published in ResearchGate ↩︎

#57. Patrik Baab: “Is Russophobia a form of racism?”

Original title: Who is funding the conflict? Michael Schneider on the power of banks & BlackRock
Interviewer: Patrik Baab1
Guest: Michael Schneider
Published: July 26, 2026
By: Gegen den Strom @PatrikBaab-Official2
On: YouTube

My comment: see footnote3

In total this is a discussion about the hidden mechanisms of power, the necessity of civic courage, and the urgent appeal: Recognize the patterns of history before they repeat themselves.

Michael Schneider

Michael Schneider looks back on decades of work as a critical intellectual and bestselling author. He argues for a return to reason and shows why the loss of historical awareness poses the greatest threat to a peaceful future in Europe.
A discussion about the hidden mechanisms of power, the necessity of civic courage, and the urgent appeal: Recognize the patterns of history before they repeat themselves.

In this interview, writer and professor Michael Schneider analyses the historical and economic driving forces behind the current confrontation with Russia. While the official narrative often emphasizes moral values, Schneider looks behind the scenes of a system driven by financial interests and a deeply rooted historical repression.

The conversation with Michael Schneider covers:
– The Economics of War: Why the Third Reich’s campaign in Russia was also a gigantic amortization plan for the German economy and what role financial capital plays today in fuelling conflicts.
– The Power of Banks: How financial giants like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs extend their influence to the highest levels of government and use wars as a means of securing devalued loans.
– Reversal of Perpetrator and Victim: Why the crimes against Soviet citizens remain a taboo subject in Germany’s collective memory and how this repression is giving rise to a new, dangerous Russophobia.
– The Betrayal of Intellectuals: The failure of the academic elite and the creeping conformity in media and universities, which increasingly marginalizes critical voices.
– Civilizational Regression: How digitalization and AI are leading to a society without history and why the legacy of the Enlightenment is under such massive attack today.
– The Crumbling Empire: Why the USA, as a “bankrupt state,” is ruthlessly sacrificing its vassals in Europe for its own interests – from deindustrialization to the destruction of vital infrastructure like Nord Stream.
“An empire that treats its vassals this way only shows how deep in the shit it is itself.”

Michael Schneider looks back on decades of work as a critical intellectual and bestselling author. He argues for a return to reason and shows why the loss of historical awareness poses the greatest threat to a peaceful future in Europe.

Timestamps
01. Economics and History: Can a Lost War Be Won? — 00:00
02. The Russian Campaign as an Amortization Plan for German Industry — 01:45
03. “All Wars Are Bankers Wars”: The Role of Financial Capital in Modern Conflicts — 03:50
04. The Power of Banks: When BlackRock and Goldman Sachs Managers Rule — 06:10
05. Plundering Ukraine: Contracts on Raw Materials and Energy Resources — 07:50
06. Managing National Debt: How to Make Money from the Ruin of Others — 11:10
07. The Suppressed Crime Against Humanity: Commemoration Culture and Its Blind Spots —13:40
08. Perpetrator-Victim Reversal: The Creeping Inheritance of Russophobia — 16:40
09. Collective Relief: Why February 24, 2022, Was Used as a “Liberation to Hate” — 19:55
10. The Betrayal of Intellectuals: Careerism vs. Civil Courage — 25:45
11. Ideological Purge: Self-Censorship in Publishing Houses and Universities — 28:30
12. Embedded Philosophy: How the German Mind Became a Sycophant of Power — 32:20
13. Civilizational Regression: From the Enlightenment to a Historyless AI Society — 38:15
14. Identitarian Thinking as a Substitute for Reason: The Legacy of the Enlightenment in Danger — 43:10
15. Aggression Shift: How Social Anger Is Politically Instrumentalized — 50:10
16. A Tottering Colossus: The USA Between Financial Collapse and Aggression Against Vassals — 55:20
17. Nord Stream and Deindustrialization: When Empires Sacrifice Their Allies — 57:55

Footnotes

  1. Patrik Baab is a German journalist and author. His research has focused on topics including intelligence agencies and political assassinations, the war in Ukraine, Russia, and geopolitical issues. He has worked in Eastern Europe and Russia, Scandinavia, Ukraine, the Balkans, and the United Kingdom. Source: Website Patrik Baab, about ↩︎
  2. Gegen den Strom: @PatrikBaab-Official ↩︎
  3. My comment:

    At 24:08 Michael Schneider makes a big mistake by stating that it was a mistake of Putin to march into Ukraine. As the Russian investigative journalist, who worked for “Echo of Moscow” and “Novaya Gazeta”, Yulia Latynina said: “They left us no choice…” in the interview with the Ukrainian Diana Panchenko: “”I WANT TO RETURN TO RUSSIA.” A Big Interview with Latynina“, published on Panchenko LIVE channel, @PanchenkoOnline on July 12, 2026.
    The cause of the decision to enter Ukraine via the start of the special operation is directly related to all what happened before that day in 2022, and which started in 2014 in Maidan, with the massacre, orchestrated by the USA and the coup, that followed, also orchestrated by the USA.[1][2][5]

    The anti-Russians in Ukraine even wanted to stop the foodsupplements in 2015 to Donbass and to create a genocide there[2]. In the documentary “Donbass”[6], made by Anne-Laure Bonnel in January 2015, we can even witness a long convoy with trucks, from Russia, transporting food to Donbass. The docu is available on YouTube.
    There was a war going on, because of NATO expansion[8], NATO provoked the Russians by expanding, Jens Stoltenberg even admitted it[9], they did it in order to get the answer where they were begging for and are experiencing now. To make the western citizens believe that Russia started the war.
    The correct sentence is: Russia was provoked to start te war.

    At the end there was indeed no other choice left, than to start with the “enough is enough”, and that is not a mistake, but a must in order to stop the NATO violations, and even till the moment of the present, NATO continues provoking. It is, since the attacks deep inside Russia not about provocations anymore, but a real war and Russia reacts on it in the legal way, in the way NATO/the collective west has begged for, laughed about, and downplayed, humiliated the Russians, making the blood of the Russians boil and finally attacking targets deep inside Russia.

    A filthy, vile, extremely aggressive anti-Russia rhetoric, full of slander and hatred was and is used by NATO’s secretary general Rutte, a maniacal warmonger. We have all heard it, it was/is his face, his mouth, his voice and he was not forced to walk to the microphone, and not forced to speak. He did it voluntarily. With joy and pleasure. NATO has even started with hiring two psychologists from the Cambridge university, to create a psychological system that creates “mass formation[10]”, and is named “Cognitive Warfare”. It is published on the NATO website[11] and not hidden. Even the names of the psychologists are publicly available[11].
    What we witnessed and are witnessing is the big mistake of the west. Not of Russia.

    So, please correct that, Michael Schneider, and start to read the following utterly important books, articles and even 2 lectures.

    [1] “The Russia Ukraine War And Its Origins, From the Maidan to the Ukraine War” – professor Ivan Katchanovski
    [2] “What I saw in Ukraine – 2015-2022 – diary of an international monitor – far away from the mainstream narrative” – Benoît Paré
    [3] “Ukraine: The Great Manipulation – 2022-2024 – decryption of war propaganda” – Benoît Paré
    [4] “[Stalingrad] is our reference point now more than ever, an unparalleled symbol of resistance, our enemies’ worst nightmare…Whosoever tries it will meet the end of all the others – Swedes, Napoleon, the Germans and their allies…Russians are like the Scythians: they wait, they suffer, they die, and then they kill.” Source: The Franco-British Plot to Dismember Russia, written by investigative journalist Kit Klarenberg, on Substack, June 26, 2024.
    [5] Jeffrey D. Sachs: “The ninth anniversary of the Ukraine war“, published on his website, on February 28, 2023.
    [6] Documentary “Donbass”, made by Anne-Laure Bonnel in January 2015. Published on YouTube.
    [7] “Three types of Ukrainians, how we were divided“, a lecture by the Ukrainian Diana Panchenko, Панченко LIVE @PanchenkoOnline (21 April, 2026)
    [8] YouTube “The Expansion of NATO Since 1949” by @WawamuStats
    [9] YouTube “Jens Stoltenberg admits NATO expansion provoked Ukraine War“, by @World_Politics1
    [10] Book: “The Psychology of Totalitarianism“, written by Dr. Mattias Desmet. YouTube: Neutrality Studies / Pascal Lottaz, May 3, 2026: “EU in Grip of Deadly Mass-Formation”  | Prof. Mattias Desmet
    [11] Lecture: “Dr. Jonas Tögel: Die Kognitive Kriegsführung der NATO – mein Vortrag bei W.I.R.“, published by Dr. Jonas Tögel on his YouTube channel @DrJonasToegel – Brilliantly explained in the lecture, at 1:19:56 – “Inoculation Theory and Misinformation”, published 29th October 2021 in NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence, by Jon Roozenbeek and Sander van der Linden. see post. ↩︎

#56. The majority of people living in Ukraine are ethnic Russians

Lecture by: Diana Panchenko1
Published: April 21, 2026
On: YouTube Панченко LIVE

Title:
Three Types Of Ukrainians: How We Were Divided

Timestamps:
00:00 Introduction
02:30 Part I: Three Types of Ukrainians
04:53 How does the hierarchy work in Ukraine?
06:33 What is life like for “third-class” people in Ukraine?
08:31 Ukraine’s plan to destroy “second-class” people
10:10 How Zelenskyy betrayed his own mother
11:25 Taras Shevchenko – a second-class Ukrainian
14:21 Part II: Shame
17:00 How Zelenskyy’s complexes destroyed Ukraine
17:50 Part III: Who is Ukrainian?
19:05 How did the USSR create Ukraine?
20:58 The history of nationalism in Ukraine
24:05 Ukraine under the USSR vs. Ukraine under Zelenskyy
27:44 Who built Ukraine?
28:37 Conclusion

This is a very important and very personal video. It tells you everything you need to know about Ukraine’s tragedy.
I will tell you about three kinds of Ukrainians.
From the perspective of a third-class Ukrainian, born in Mykolaiv.
About how we were divided into the good and the bad. About how they decided to remake us, the bad guys. And those who couldn’t, to destroy.
I appeal to all residents of Odesa, Mykolaiv, Kharkiv, and other cities in the Southeast.
You should not be ashamed of yourselves.
You are not worse, but better.
You must and can stand up for yourselves.
I dedicate this video to you. And I believe in you.
Ukraine will not become Lviv. Rather, it will not become Ukraine.

Footnote

  1. Diana Panchenko was born 21 May 1988, in Nikolayev (Lviv region), Ukrainian SSR, USSR. In August 2025, Panchenko’s YouTube channel, which had 1.8 million subscribers and millions of views as of September 2024, was deleted following a request from Ukraine’s Center for Countering Disinformation. See also: #55. A Big Interview with Yulia Latynina ↩︎

#55. A Big Interview with Yulia Latynina

“They Left Us No Choice.”
Latynina on the Maidan, the war,
and how the West “divorced” both Ukraine and Russia.

Published: July 12, 2026
By: Панченко LIVE 1
On: YouTube

Yulia Latynina [Source – CC BY-SA 4.0]

Today, our guest is Yulia Latynina—one of Russia’s most famous journalists, the former voice of Ekho Moskvy 2 and Novaya Gazeta 3, a person considered for years a symbol of the liberal opposition 4 and an unconditional supporter of the Western agenda.
But in this conversation, you’ll see a very different Latynina 5.

Who, in her opinion, fired shots on the Maidan? Why were Russian-speaking Ukrainians turned into strangers in their own country? How did the West exploit Ukraine in its own grand game? Why did a conflict they promised to prevent ultimately lead to Russians and Ukrainians finding themselves on opposite sides of the front?

After this interview, some will say that Latynina betrayed her own people. Others say she said for the first time what many were afraid to say out loud.

Timecodes:
01. Introduction — 00:00
02. Introduction and why Latynina watches Panchenko’s channel — 00:41
03. Russian language in Ukraine: what Russian liberals 6 overlooked — 02:09
04. How to admit your mistakes and not fear “cancellation” — 03:33
05. Accusations of a “new trough”: grants and USAID 7 , 8 — 05:32
06. Maidan 2014 through Panchenko’s eyes: “black sheep” in their own country — 07:06
07. “Three types of Ukrainians” — 09:59
08. Sternenko, the “Russo-cutter,” and the murder charge — 11:15
09. Who really shot on the Maidan? 9 , 10 — 15:32
10. Korsun, Anti-Maidan Buses, and Right-Wing Activists — 20:47
11. Odessa, May 2: Trade Union House — 22:12
12.The First Night of Maidan: Provocateurs, Inter, Lyovochkin — 24:00
13. A Pre-Planned Scenario and Yanukovych’s Flight — 28:20
14. Maidan Money: Oligarchs, USAID 11, Jeffrey Sachs 12, 13 — 34:03
15. Russia and Ukraine as “Western Colonies” — 38:42
16. 1991 and the Rosy Picture of the West — 42:24
17. What is “Victory” for Russian Liberals? 14 — 45:04
18. Soft Power: Activists as a “Second State” — 46:22
19. Zelensky, Paris, and 70 NGOs against Peace — 47:03
20. Do You Trust Putin Today? — 51:24
21. February 24, 2022: Elite Shock and a “Stream of Shit” Addressed to Russians — 52:16
22. The Victim Has the Right to Everything 15 — 55:52
23. Zelensky’s Team Euphoria and London 2020 — 1:04:06
24. Who’s Winning and Whom Latynina Is Rooting for — 1:06:38
25. Istanbul, Trump, and the Game Against China — 1:08:26
26. Who Benefits from War: The US, Europe, and the Thucydides Trap — 1:10:30
27. Balance of Power: Russia vs. Europe — 1:14:33
28. Does Latynina Want to Return to Russia? — 1:19:06
29. Would They Head an RT Analogue? — 1:23:39
30. Panchenko’s Personal Story: Losing Friends and Returning People — 1:25:08
31. The Idea of ​​a Great Debate: Solovyov, Korchinsky, and Others — 1:26:07
32. Can Russians and Ukrainians Fight Together Against the West? — 1:27:31
33. Are Russians Fighting Russians? — 1:31:13
34. Why Was the Russian Press Silent? — 1:35:14
35. Will Russia Become “Fashionable” Again? The Dud Phenomenon — 1:37:02
36. Poland’s U-Turn and Karaganov’s Signals — 1:38:21
37. Sacralization of Death and the Seizure of Churches in Ukraine — 1:42:11
38. “Ukrainians Are the Most Unfree People” — 1:44:00
39. Finale and Acknowledgments — 1:45:29

Footnotes

  1. Панченко LIVE: owner is Diana Panchenko, born 21 May 1988, Nikolayev(Lviv region), Ukrainian SSR, USSR. In August 2025, Panchenko’s YouTube channel, which had 1.8 million subscribers and millions of views as of September 2024, was deleted following a request from Ukraine’s Center for Countering Disinformation. ↩︎
  2. Wikipedia English: Echo of Moscow; Wikipedia Russian: Эхо Москвы ↩︎
  3. Website: Novaya Gazeta / Wikipedia English: Novaya Gazeta / Wikipedia Russian: Новая газета ↩︎
  4. Liberal opposition: see also the post: 53. Yulia Latynina: the Russian opposition journalist ↩︎
  5. Read also the post: 53. Yulia Latynina: the Russian opposition journalist ↩︎
  6. The term “liberals” is in Russia used for those who oppose the Putin government. See also 53. Yulia Latynina: the Russian opposition journalis ↩︎
  7. USAID: see also blog post 12. Ukraine and USAID ↩︎
  8. USAID: See also the short video on Panchenko’s YouTube channel about this subject “Bags of money on the Maidan“: “I saw money being handed over on the Maidan myself.”
    Panchenko and Latynina discuss who financed the Maidan: Western money through USAID, oligarchs’ money, and funding of Ukrainian media. And why no “Maidan” is possible without the support of the media and intelligence agencies. ↩︎
  9. Referred to is professor Ivan Katchanovski, who researched the entire “Maidan” revolt and massacre, and this is all collected in the book, available on the website of Springer Link: see The Russia Ukraine War And Its Origins, From the Maidan to the Ukraine War
    NOTE: Please sign 51. An Open Letter in Support of Academic Freedom and Ivan Katchanovski (Published) ↩︎
  10. See also the short video: “The “victim” label justifies everything“: Latynina on one simple question about Maidan 2014: if the shooting took place from the Ukraina Hotel (as Ivan Katchanovsky’s investigation shows), then why hasn’t the authorities found the snipers in over 10 years? Because they didn’t want to. ↩︎
  11. USAID: See also the short video on Panchenko’s YouTube channel about this subject “Bags of money on the Maidan“: “I saw money being handed over on the Maidan myself.”
    Panchenko and Latynina discuss who financed the Maidan: Western money through USAID, oligarchs’ money, and funding of Ukrainian media. And why no “Maidan” is possible without the support of the media and intelligence agencies. ↩︎
  12. Professor Jeffrey D. Sachs, website / YouTube ↩︎
  13. See also the short video on Panchenko’s YouTube channel about this subject “Bags of money on the Maidan“: “I saw money being handed over on the Maidan myself.”
    Panchenko and Latynina discuss who financed the Maidan: Western money through USAID, oligarchs’ money, and funding of Ukrainian media. And why no “Maidan” is possible without the support of the media and intelligence agencies. ↩︎
  14. Liberals: see also footnote 6, and the short video: Latynina: Russian liberals are useful idiots. Yulia Latynina, in an interview with Panchenko, discusses how the independent Russian press, in her opinion, was integrated into the vast USAID machine and failed to notice what she saw with her own eyes on the Maidan. ↩︎
  15. See also the short video: “The “victim” label justifies everything“: Latynina on one simple question about Maidan 2014: if the shooting took place from the Ukraina Hotel (as Ivan Katchanovsky’s investigation shows), then why hasn’t the authorities found the snipers in over 10 years? Because they didn’t want to. ↩︎

#54. Yulia Latynina: Being an enemy of the West is dangerous. Being its colony is fatal

Introduction

Being curious about Yulia Latynina’s way of analysing the current situation in Russia “Sustainable Politics” publishes this video, as a following up of the former post: 53. Yulia Latynina: the Russian opposition journalist. It is surprising to hear her mentioning the name Ivan Katchanovski1, and touting his research on the Maidan Massacre.

Video (subtitles available)

“Being an enemy of the West is dangerous. Being its colony is fatal”. Interview with Zhivoy Gvozd
Published: July 15, 2026
By: Yulia Latynina

Timestamps
00:00:00 Start of broadcast
00:00:18 Fuel crisis in Russia and gasoline shortages
00:10:45 Crimea’s status and perception of the North-Eastern Front
00:24:30 Propaganda, public sentiment, and the state of the Russian economy
00:36:20 Konstantinovka and the situation at the front
00:47:40 Donald Trump, sanctions, and Western policy
00:59:30 What could change the situation in Russia
01:07:10 Answers to viewers’ questions
01:11:30 End of broadcast

  1. Professor Ivan Katchanovski: The Russia Ukraine War And Its Origins, From the Maidan to the Ukraine War, his work is mentioned in the video, in a chapter that starts at about 9:35 in the video-interview. ↩︎

#52. Russians are like the Scythians

“[Stalingrad] is our reference point now more than ever, an unparalleled symbol of resistance, our enemies’ worst nightmare…Whosoever tries it will meet the end of all the others – Swedes, Napoleon, the Germans and their allies…Russians are like the Scythians1,2: they wait, they suffer, they die, and then they kill.” Source

Scythians, Simeon Netchev (CC BY-NC-ND)

This post is opened with a quote from an article published on Substack in June 2024, by Kit Klarenberg (investigative journalist): The Franco-British Plot to Dismember Russia, because I was impressed by the last sentence of that specific quote: “Russians are like the Scythians: they wait, they suffer, they die, and then they kill“.

That last sentence fits Russia’s president Vladimir Putin’s system, in the way he protected his sacred red line, dating back to the 1990s: “Ukraine must never join NATO”, and all that has followed ever since, and what has created a logical historical timeline about what has been provoked by the west, by NATO expansion, and it seems that the last point of the quoted sentence has been reached: “…. then they kill”. Reason to believe so: the constantly increasing amount of shameless, provoking Ukrainian (=NATO) drone attacks, deep inside Russia, created severe, deadly answers and more are expected3,4.

To offer eventual readers the possibility to become updated about the causes of the long awaited answers from Russia on Ukrainian (=NATO) drone attacks on targets even deep inside Russia, the following articles and videos are published here, without additional personal comments.

Admin.

1. NRK5 shows a map

Ukraine: The Lord of the Drones
Fredrik Tombra – Correspondent
Torstein Georg Bøe – Photojournalist
Published June 20, 2026

Map, published on June 20, 2026, 12 days before the Russian strikes on Kiev and Sumy. Published by NRK, in their article Ukraina: Dronenes herre

2. Col. Douglas Macgregor6 explains

Published: June 30, 2026, 2 days before the Russian strikes on Kiev and Sumy
Published: July 1, 2026, 1 day before the Russian strikes on Kiev and Sumy.

3. Stanislav Krapivnik7 explains

Published: July 2, 2026, after the Russian strikes on Kiev and Sumy

Timestamps
00:00:00 Donbas school strike report
00:08:20 Targeting civilians and terror claims
00:19:01 Diplomacy, trust, and Trump
00:26:23 Russia prepares for wider war
00:35:23 Retaliation and war aims
00:45:51 NATO control and war cohesion

4. Alexander Mercouris8 explains

Published: July 2, 2026, after the Russian strikes on Kiev and Sumy

Timestamps
00:00:00 Introduction and Kiev strike overview
00:00:37 Scale of the massive strike
00:02:20 Missile and drone types used
00:04:32 Oreshnik hypersonic speculation
00:09:28 Why Oreshnik was held back
00:11:41 Russian justification for the strikes
00:14:09 Targets hit including Volgograd factory
00:16:15 Casualties and future strike campaign
00:17:04 Why Kiev is being targeted
00:20:37 Zelensky warns of Belarus threat
00:22:34 Source confirms Chernihiv offensive plan
00:28:01 Kupyansk situation update
00:33:30 Kharkov region recapture plan
00:34:14 Donbass pressure and Dobropillia advance
00:37:01 Sloviansk and Kostiantynivka clearing operations
00:41:11 Zaporizhzhia and Orikhiv front
00:47:21 Zelensky floats autumn elections
00:48:43 Zelensky requests more EU funding
00:50:48 UK defense spending controversy
00:59:04 Europe energy crisis and Trump LNG threat

5. The Duran9 explains

Published: July 2, 2026, after the Russian strikes on Kiev and Sumy

Timestamps
00:00:00 Russia launches massive strikes on Kiev and Sumy
00:00:58 Why Russia calls these strikes retaliatory
00:01:58 The pattern behind Russia’s escalating campaign
00:06:24 Russian air campaign targets Ukrainian logistics
00:08:32 Drones hit gas stations to choke supply lines
00:11:04 Ukraine’s Flamingo missiles strike
00:12:34 The new Dirty Dagger missile threat
00:17:56 Russia’s gasoline import mystery explained
00:18:30 Zelensky’s Pantheon of Heroes sparks backlash
00:21:35 Belarus Lukashenko meets Putin as Syrsky10 breaks with Zelensky

Footnotes

  1. Information about the Scythians is published on the Russian Wikipedia page, marked as a good article with a silver star. Скифо-сибирский мир. Since not any other language offers guaranteed correct information, it is a must to read all other languages with caution: Wikipedia can also provide misinformation, this depends on the editors. The opening text of the Russian page, machine translated:
    —- The Scytho-Siberian world (sometimes Scytho-Saka, Scythian world/circle, etc.) is a conventional name adopted in archaeology for a cultural and historical community whose sites are widespread in the steppe, part of the forest-steppe, and foothill zones of Central Eurasia (from the Lower Danube region to the Baikal region and Mongolia). It included a number of archaeological cultures, primarily united by the presence of three distinctive artefact complexes (the so-called Scythian triad). The probable place of formation is Central Asia, and the period of existence is the first millennium BC. This period in the Eurasian steppes is commonly referred to as the Scythian era.
    —- Representatives of the Scytho-Siberian world are Iranian-speaking Caucasoids, sometimes with Mongoloid elements. The majority were nomadic pastoralists, while a small portion of the population in the forest-steppe were sedentary herders-hunters and pastoralists-farmers. In the Eurasian steppes, the advent of the Early Iron Age is associated with the cultures of the Scytho-Siberian world; they had contacts with Ancient Greece, China, the Near East, and other countries.

    Name
    The name “Scytho-Siberian world” refers to the geographic distribution of this cultural and historical community, limited to the territory of its most famous tribes, the Scythians, in the west and encompassing part of the Siberian region in the east. Literature also sometimes uses the term “Scytho-Saka world,” adding another eastern boundary—Central Asia, inhabited by tribes known collectively as the Sakas. A shorter name, simply the “Scythian world,” is also used. Some authors use the word “world” in parallel with the meaning “circle,” for example, the Scythian-Siberian circle of archaeological cultures or monuments. Also synonymous is the term “Scythia” in the broad sense of a toponym or the Scythian-Siberian historical and cultural region. The term “Scythian cultures” is also present in literature.
    For all other following info please visit the Russian Wikipedia page.

    Since it is relevant here: Russian classical music, composed by Alexander Borodin, the video: In the steppes of East Asia – Mongolia ↩︎
  2. World History: Scythians ↩︎
  3. Videos APT, July 2, 2026
    – Russian Drones Hit Central Kyiv, Damaging Biochemistry Research Institute | APT
    – Russia Pounds Kyiv Overnight: Missiles, Drones Kill 11, Apartment Blocks Reduced to Rubble | APT
    ↩︎
  4. Ray McGovern: Ukraine has launched a string of high profile drone strikes on Moscow, St Petersburg and oil refineries. Commentators are, once again, claiming Russia is losing the war. But is it? ” Read his full article, published on June 23, 2026, on his website, and on Substack. ↩︎
  5. NRK is the Norwegian public broadcasting, radio corporation and news website. The corporation is state-owned, guided by its bylaws and ethical guidelines, with a board partly appointed by the government, through the Ministry of Culture and Equality, and elected by staff. Its bylaws and ethical guidelines secure independent editorial control for journalists and editors. ↩︎
  6. Colonel Douglas Macgregor is is a decorated combat veteran, an author of five books, a PhD, and a defense and foreign policy consultant. Macgregor was commissioned in the Regular Army in 1976 after 1 year at VMI and 4 years at West Point. In 2004, Macgregor retired with the rank of Colonel. In 2020, the President appointed Macgregor to serve as Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Defense, a post he held until President Trump left office. He holds an MA in comparative politics and a PhD in international relations from the University of Virginia. YouTube playlist – Substack ↩︎
  7. Stanislav Krapivnik is a former US Army officer, supply chain exec and military-political expert, now based in Russia. He was born in Lugansk during the Soviet times, migrated to the US as a child, served in the US army, did not like what it was doing in former Yugoslavia, quit, and returned to Russia. Mr. Krapivnik is an independent contractor and consults and appears in the international media in his areas of expertise in military matters, NATO, America, history, economics and supply chains. Substack ↩︎
  8. Alexander Mercouris (The Duran) is a writer on international affairs with a special interest in Russia and law. He has written extensively on the legal aspects of NSA spying and events in Ukraine in terms of human rights, constitutionality and international law. He worked for 12 years in the Royal Courts of Justice in London as a lawyer, specializing in human rights and constitutional law. His family has been prominent in Greek politics for several generations. Together with Alex Christoforou he hosts the “The Duran” YT channel, plus his own YT channel. Bio, Videos ↩︎
  9. The Duran is a very popular YouTube channel, founded on 25 May 2016, by Alex Christoforou, a geopolitical analyst and Alexander Mercouris, who is a writer on international affairs with a special interest in Russia and law. He has written extensively on the legal aspects of NSA spying and events in Ukraine in terms of human rights, constitutionality and international law. He worked for 12 years in the Royal Courts of Justice in London as a lawyer, specializing in human rights and constitutional law. His family has been prominent in Greek politics for several generations. Videos. Total views, as of July 2, 2026: 256,185,789 and total subscribers is 530.000. ↩︎
  10. Oleksandr Syrskyi is a Ukrainian military officer holding the rank of four-star general who has served as the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine since 8 February 2024. ↩︎

#47. Col. Douglas Macgregor: USA Collapsing: Washington‘s Soviet Moment Is Here

Discussion with Neutrality Studies [Pascal Lottaz], and colonel Douglas Macgregor, published May 29, 2026

Summary
Hegemony is over not only on the outside but within the US, too. The decline is irreversible says Colonel Douglas Macgregor. Pascal Lottaz and Col. Macgregor talk about Russia’s next moves in Ukraine, the risk of wider NATO escalation, U.S. support for foreign wars, and why America’s base network and war spending may be unsustainable. Macgregor argues the U.S. is losing control, the economy is the real pressure point, and a major pullback from overseas is coming.

Links

McGregor Warrior Substack: https://macgregorwarrior.substack.com
The National Conversation: https://thenationalconversation.org

Neutrality Studies Substack: https://pascallottaz.substack.com

Timestamps

00:00:00 Russia and Ukraine Turning Point
00:13:40 NATO Pressure and Nuclear Risk
00:15:14 America Rejects Another War
00:21:27 Bases, Parties, and Retreat
00:24:50 Soviet Collapse and U S Decline
00:29:21 Cuba Puerto Rico and the Hemisphere
00:32:24 Empire Mindset and Iran
00:37:23 Media Pressure and Public Pushback
00:40:44 Debt, Cuts, and the End Game

#32. NATO’s Cognitive Warfare

Lecture (2023) by Dr. Jonas Tögel, published on September 10, 2025 (subtitled)

Dr. Jonas Tögel is a German psychologist, American studies scholar, propaganda researcher, and bestselling author. He works as a research associate at the Institute of Psychology at the University of Regensburg. His motivation is to help people recognize, understand, and neutralize manipulation in everyday life and propaganda. In doing so, he is committed to strengthening his audience’s resilience so that one can remain peaceful, positive, and able to act even in difficult times. Website: Dr. Jonas Tögel

“When I gave my lecture on NATO’s cognitive warfare in spring 2023, it was not foreseeable how much the threat of war in Europe would increase.
Today it is clear that cognitive warfare has divided populations, weakened the peace movement, and that it is therefore possible to continue to push forward with rearmament and a new, major war in Europe.
What is needed now is an understanding of the mechanisms of war propaganda and a determined, shared, and loud desire for peace.” – Dr. Jonas Tögel

More:

Read online

Quote: “[…..] we first discuss how to define “misinformation”, and how it relates to various other commonly used terms such as “disinformation” and “fake news”. Next, we examine the psychology of correcting misinformation: what happens when someone is exposed to a fact check, and what are the benefits and drawbacks of correcting misinformation once the damage is already done? Finally, we discuss how to build psychological resilience against misinformation through psychological “vaccines” or “inoculation”: we look at the theoretical background of inoculation theory (dating back to the 1960s), its modern application within the context of online misinformation (in online games and educational videos), and future prospects and research avenues in the field.“

Attention: Both authors are professors at the university of Cambridge: check Jon Roozenbeek and Sander van der Linden. The biography on their Cambridge profile doesn’t mention any collaboration with NATO or writing for NATO. There’s no link to the NATO document “Inoculation Theory and Misinformation”. Why not? There must be a reason.
There’s no link to their Cambridge profile on the NATO profile. Check: Jon Roozenbeek and Sander van der Linden. Why not?
Conclusion: That, which cannot stand the light of day, is being concealed.
Both professors have prostituted their knowledge regarding the possibility of brain manipulation, and NATO is the pimp.

In case the page will be removed from the NATO website, and all denied, today, October 11, 2025 this PDF has been created. The from the NATO website downloaded file: PDF

Screenshot taken October 11, 2025, from the NATO website.

More in Blog Multerland: “Evidence based science or prostitution?“

#31. War Games – Geostrategy in a Multipolar World

LECTURE by DR. JONAS TÖGEL, German psychologist, American studies scholar, propaganda researcher, and bestselling author. He works as a research associate at the Institute of Psychology at the University of Regensburg. His motivation is to help people recognize, understand, and neutralize manipulation in everyday life and propaganda. In doing so, he is committed to strengthening his audience’s resilience so that one can remain peaceful, positive, and able to act even in difficult times. Website: Dr. Jonas Tögel

Part 1: NATO vs. Russia – Understanding Geostrategy (subtitles available)
Published: October 5, 2025

Part 2. Going to war with geostrategy?
Published: October 8, 2025

Additional:

NATO’s Cognitive Warfare

#30. What I Saw in Ukraine: 2015-2022

– Diary of an International Observer

Paperback – May 22, 2025
Author: Benoit Paré, born in Paris, in 1961, is living in Greece since 1986. He is a French army reserve officer and former defense ministry analyst. Most importantly, Mr. Paré worked for the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), as part of the seize-fire monitoring mission in Eastern Ukraine. 

Ukraine 2015-2022.

A unique account of its kind, precise, sensitive, and personal, seen from the inside of an international mission at the heart of the Donbass war.
The reality on the ground, from the front lines.
New revelations, notably concerning civilian casualties, human rights violations, conflict-related trials, and the manipulation of facts.
And then, how the US-sponsored Ukrainian ultra-nationalist project provoked Moscow’s reaction.
This book is primarily intended for those who prioritize facts over partisanship and who want to understand how the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War II came about.

Video interview conducted by Pascal Lottaz, Neutrality Studies. Premiered on August 5, 2025: “Today I’m talking to Benoît Paré, a French army reserve officer and former defense ministry analyst. Most importantly, Mr. Paré worked for the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), as part of the seize-fire monitoring mission in Eastern Ukraine. He also wrote a book about this experiences in the Donbas with the title “What I saw in Ukraine: 2015-2022, Diary of an international Observer”.”

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑