LECTURE by DR. JONAS TÖGEL, German psychologist, American studies scholar, propaganda researcher, and bestselling author. He works as a research associate at the Institute of Psychology at the University of Regensburg. His motivation is to help people recognize, understand, and neutralize manipulation in everyday life and propaganda. In doing so, he is committed to strengthening his audience’s resilience so that one can remain peaceful, positive, and able to act even in difficult times. Website: Dr. Jonas Tögel
Part 1: NATO vs. Russia – Understanding Geostrategy (subtitles available) Published: October 5, 2025
Part 2. Going to war with geostrategy? Published: October 8, 2025
According to theCommittee to Protect Journalists, 2024 was the deadliest year on record for journalists, with at least 124 killed. A significant number of these deaths occurred in Gaza, where the ongoing conflict took a devastating toll on reporters covering the war.
While Europe has commonly been a safer place, we are seeing how the continent’s journalists are facing growing threats: harassment, surveillance, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPS), and, in some cases, physical violence. In Eastern Europe, governments use state-controlled media and legal pressure to silence dissenting voices, as seen in Hungary and Poland. Countries like France, Germany and Greece also report rising hostility toward journalists, especially during protests or when covering sensitive topics.
Our revelations on the European Media Freedom Act negotiations exposed governments’ intentions to authorise surveillance against journalists. Our findings were crucial to ensure the passing of a fairer law – but still, a magnitude of risks and threats remain.
Today, on World Press Freedom Day, we want to show solidarity with colleagues around the world and raise awareness about the importance of a free and independent media.
At Investigate Europe we use our reach across the continent to ensure that institutions are scrutinised, powerful actors are held accountable and transparency prevails.
In the video below, our reporter in Hungary, Attila Kálmán, and editorial director, Alessia Cerantola, express support for journalists standing up for press freedom and bring you closer to the work we do.
Your support allows us to continue to publish agenda-setting investigative journalism and defend press freedom across Europe.
Post updated: October 9, 2024 (scroll down to video)
The outcome of the American election won’t change anything, because the course is already set
Published: October 5, 2024 In: RT By: Andrey Sushentsov, program director at the Valdai Club.
The American presidential campaign of 2024 has been marked by a series of unprecedented events. These include lawsuits against one candidate and relatives of the sitting president, assassination attempts against Donald Trump and, finally, the unprecedented situation of Joe Biden being forced out of the race by his own party. All of this has made the election marathon an extraordinary event.
Meanwhile, domestic politics in the US is spilling over into the rest of the world, and it’s helping fuel the growing dissatisfaction of the countries representing the world’s majority with the intense attempts by Washington to maintain its leadership. But we should not read too much into the vote, because the policy of seeking to preserve American dominance remains the main strategy of both candidates.
The neoconservative group remains quite prominent in the ruling Democratic Party, whose members’ worldview is built around the idea of power as the only tool for maintaining US leadership. This position doesn’t depend on personal attitudes and beliefs, but is derived from the status they occupy in the political mechanism. The then Senator Biden, for example, once proposed a large number of constructive initiatives in Congress. Among other things, he opposed NATO membership for the Baltic states, to the point where his party colleagues accused him of being too peace-loving in his foreign policy.
Once in the White House, however, Biden strictly followed the usual American logic of global leadership. The defense budget under his administration broke all records of recent decades. The consistency of US foreign policy practice in terms of deterrence strategy towards geopolitical rivals allows us to assert that the structural confrontation with Russia and China will continue regardless of the outcome of the election. The dynamics of this confrontation – in Ukraine and around Taiwan – will be determined by the military budget, a draft of which has already been developed and will be approved before the inauguration of his successor.
Against the backdrop of the election campaign, it is particularly interesting to see how much sharper the rhetoric has become and how it has been filled with catchy, ‘workable’ initiatives. Former Secretary of State Michael Pompeo’s plan for a “forced peace” in Ukraine, which proposes, among other things, that Kiev be brought into NATO on an accelerated basis “so that European allies will bear the burden of its defense,” has been well received. The result of such a scenario would be a direct military conflict between NATO and Russia, so it is unlikely. Such statements, which do not demonstrate a systemic understanding of the situation, need not in principle be long-term in nature. Their function is to mobilize hawks in the establishment, and among the electorate, to show that a forced escalation of the conflict is one possible scenario. It should be noted that as secretary of state, Pompeo established himself as a man prone to making high-profile statements that didn’t culminate in large-scale actions. Nevertheless, his quote is worth considering in the context of the fact that there is no political force in the US that would see the outcome of the Ukraine crisis as an opportunity for reconciliation with Russia.
On the one hand, a continuation will allow Washington to mobilize European NATO members to increase defense spending to a new target of 3% of GDP. In essence, this means more purchases of American weapons by Western Europeans and thus support for the US military-industrial complex. On the other hand, active support for Ukraine allows Russia to be drawn deeper and deeper into an expensive military campaign, thus solving the problem of deterrence without direct confrontation.
The collision of interests between Washington and Kiev is noteworthy here. The Ukrainian government, well aware that its own resources have been exhausted, is feverishly trying to cling to any chance of remaining at the top of the Western coalition’s priorities, and often – as in Kursk – acts rather opportunistically. By offering the West a visible military success, Kiev hoped to force it to become directly involved in the conflict. The Americans see this impulse from Ukraine, but are not interested in such a scenario.
Washington needs Ukraine as a proxy that it can use for as long as possible. The country’s usefulness as an instrument of US foreign policy suggests that the US-Russian crisis will be protracted. At the same time, the upward trajectory of the American defense budget will not change, regardless of the outcome of the election. Thus, Russian foreign policy and military planning is based on maintaining the present military conditions and continuing the strategic rivalry with the US, regardless of who the next American president is.
This article was first published by Valdai Discussion Club, translated and edited by the RT team.
Dr. Sushentsov is a Russian political scientist and foreign relations expert specializing in the American studies. In 2005, he graduated from Moscow State University’s Faculty of History with honors. In 2010, he was a full-time postgraduate student at MGIMO, where he defended a thesis on the topic “US political strategy in international conflicts in the 2000s (evidence from the situation in Afghanistan and Iraq” (2011).
On October 9, 2024, the following video was published by Prof. Pascal Lottaz. The content confirms the content of the article above.
EU Parliament Member EXPOSES Brussel’s Madness | Michael von der Schulenburg – The EU is quite aware about the dramatic situation in the Ukraine War but still, they are pushing on with ever more talk about continuing the war “as long as it takes”. Michael von der Schulenburg, one of the EU parliament’s new German members, talks with Fritz Edlinger about how Europe has isolated itself and drove its own foreign policy into a corner from which it now has no place to escape.
Sustainable Politics 