Tag: NATO

#34. Dr. Tögel: State Terrorism and Cognitive Warfare – Understanding Propaganda

Edited: October 31, 2025 (Instagram info was added)

This blog post concerns a video in which Dr. Tögel1 explains how mainstream media is used for propaganda and cognitive warfare2. He goes into great detail about what is being said, what is being claimed, and what is true or false. The video concerns the German ZDF broadcast, published on October 23rd, titled “Markus Lanz.”3 Markus Lanz4 moderates the interview with guests: Georg Mascolo5, Katja Kloger6, and Andrey Gurkov7.

Dr. Jonas Tögel:

When I watched the “Markus Lanz” program from October 23, 2025, and analyzed it for war propaganda, I was immediately struck by how one-sided the choice of guests was: Both Katja Gloger and her husband, Georg Mascolo, are members of the “Atlantikbrücke” – a transatlantic think tank that receives funding from, among others, banks and the German Foreign Office. Unfortunately, Markus Lanz did not introduce either of them as transatlantic lobbyists. The selection of guests thus plays a significant role: I myself have experienced firsthand that one is not invited to talk shows if one does not represent the desired positions. Source Instagram

The “Markus Lanz” show from October 23rd is a good example of how the same issues can be presented very differently: In the program, it’s perfectly acceptable to discuss state terrorism: terrorist attacks are carried out by one’s own intelligence services, for which an enemy is blamed, against whom war can now be waged under the pretext of “terrorism.” When it comes to the 1999 terrorist attacks in Moscow and the Russian KGB/FSB is the possible perpetrator, such considerations are not only permissible but even probable. However, when it comes to September 11, 2001, and American intelligence services as possible perpetrators, such considerations are not allowed and are dismissed as “conspiracy theories.” I find that astonishing. Source Instagram

Because the mainstream propaganda system, explained in detail in this video, is not only used in Germany, the video is published here, so that we all can learn how the crowds are mislead, brainwashed. The video is subtitled. Choose your language in the menu bar. The menu bar becomes visible after you have clicked the red YT start button.

Footnotes

  1. Dr. Tögel, website: https://www.jonastoegel.de ↩︎
  2. See earlier published blogposts:
    #31. War Games – Geostrategy in a Multipolar World
    #32. NATO’s Cognitive Warfare ↩︎
  3. ZDF: https://www.zdf.de/talk/markus-lanz-114 ↩︎
  4. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markus_Lanz ↩︎
  5. International Consortium of Investigative Journalists – Georg Mascolo – https://www.icij.org/journalists/georg-mascolo
    “Georg Mascolo, Germany, is a bestselling author and journalist who worked for nearly 25 years for the Spiegel Group.
    From 2008 until 2013, he was editor-in-chief of Spiegel magazine. From 2014 until 2022, he was the head of the Joint Investigative Group of Süddeutsche Zeitung and the two German public broadcasters WDR and NDR.
    Mascolo has been an ICIJ member since 1998.
    He has been the dean of the Bucerius Summer School on Global Governance since 2017. In 2014, he was named Political Journalist of the Year by the influential professional journal Medium Magazin.”     ↩︎
  6. Journalismusfest Innsbruck – Katja Gloger – https://www.journalismusfest.org/en/katja-gloger-2
    “Katja Gloger studied Eastern European history, Political science and Slavic studies in Hamburg and Moscow. After graduating from the German School of Journalism in Munich, she became a TV-reporter for WDR Radio and Television in Cologne. From 1989 on she was based as  correspondent for the weekly Stern in Moscow.. Gloger interviewed Mikhail Gorbachev, Boris Yeltsin and Vladimir Putin, whom she accompanied for months as the first Western correspondent. She later headed the foreign desk of Stern and was posted as senior political correspondent to Washington, D.C.
    Honored with the Henri-Nannen-Award and named political “Journalist of the Year” she now works as a freelance journalist and book author focusing on Russia and Security Policy. Her books include Putin’s World: The New Russia, Ukraine and the West; Stranger Friends: Germans and Russians. The Story of a Fateful Relationship and the bestseller Outbreak: Insights into a Pandemic. 
    She is a regular guest on German radio and television, panelist and moderator of discussions on Russia and international affairs. In her honorary capacity, she is Spokesperson and Executive Member of the Board of RSF Reporters without Borders, Germany. She lives in Berlin.”     ↩︎
  7. Wikipedia – Andrey Gurkov – https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrey_Gurkov ↩︎

#32. NATO’s Cognitive Warfare

Lecture (2023) by Dr. Jonas Tögel, published on September 10, 2025 (subtitled)

Dr. Jonas Tögel is a German psychologist, American studies scholar, propaganda researcher, and bestselling author. He works as a research associate at the Institute of Psychology at the University of Regensburg. His motivation is to help people recognize, understand, and neutralize manipulation in everyday life and propaganda. In doing so, he is committed to strengthening his audience’s resilience so that one can remain peaceful, positive, and able to act even in difficult times. Website: Dr. Jonas Tögel

“When I gave my lecture on NATO’s cognitive warfare in spring 2023, it was not foreseeable how much the threat of war in Europe would increase.
Today it is clear that cognitive warfare has divided populations, weakened the peace movement, and that it is therefore possible to continue to push forward with rearmament and a new, major war in Europe.
What is needed now is an understanding of the mechanisms of war propaganda and a determined, shared, and loud desire for peace.” – Dr. Jonas Tögel

More:

Read online

Quote: “[…..] we first discuss how to define “misinformation”, and how it relates to various other commonly used terms such as “disinformation” and “fake news”. Next, we examine the psychology of correcting misinformation: what happens when someone is exposed to a fact check, and what are the benefits and drawbacks of correcting misinformation once the damage is already done? Finally, we discuss how to build psychological resilience against misinformation through psychological “vaccines” or “inoculation”: we look at the theoretical background of inoculation theory (dating back to the 1960s), its modern application within the context of online misinformation (in online games and educational videos), and future prospects and research avenues in the field.“

Attention: Both authors are professors at the university of Cambridge: check Jon Roozenbeek and Sander van der Linden. The biography on their Cambridge profile doesn’t mention any collaboration with NATO or writing for NATO. There’s no link to the NATO document “Inoculation Theory and Misinformation”. Why not? There must be a reason.
There’s no link to their Cambridge profile on the NATO profile. Check: Jon Roozenbeek and Sander van der Linden. Why not?
Conclusion: That, which cannot stand the light of day, is being concealed.
Both professors have prostituted their knowledge regarding the possibility of brain manipulation, and NATO is the pimp.

In case the page will be removed from the NATO website, and all denied, today, October 11, 2025 this PDF has been created. The from the NATO website downloaded file: PDF

Screenshot taken October 11, 2025, from the NATO website.

More in Blog Multerland: “Evidence based science or prostitution?“

#31. War Games – Geostrategy in a Multipolar World

LECTURE by DR. JONAS TÖGEL, German psychologist, American studies scholar, propaganda researcher, and bestselling author. He works as a research associate at the Institute of Psychology at the University of Regensburg. His motivation is to help people recognize, understand, and neutralize manipulation in everyday life and propaganda. In doing so, he is committed to strengthening his audience’s resilience so that one can remain peaceful, positive, and able to act even in difficult times. Website: Dr. Jonas Tögel

Part 1: NATO vs. Russia – Understanding Geostrategy (subtitles available)
Published: October 5, 2025

Part 2. Going to war with geostrategy?
Published: October 8, 2025

Additional:

NATO’s Cognitive Warfare

#30. What I Saw in Ukraine: 2015-2022

– Diary of an International Observer

Paperback – May 22, 2025
Author: Benoit Paré, born in Paris, in 1961, is living in Greece since 1986. He is a French army reserve officer and former defense ministry analyst. Most importantly, Mr. Paré worked for the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), as part of the seize-fire monitoring mission in Eastern Ukraine. 

Ukraine 2015-2022.

A unique account of its kind, precise, sensitive, and personal, seen from the inside of an international mission at the heart of the Donbass war.
The reality on the ground, from the front lines.
New revelations, notably concerning civilian casualties, human rights violations, conflict-related trials, and the manipulation of facts.
And then, how the US-sponsored Ukrainian ultra-nationalist project provoked Moscow’s reaction.
This book is primarily intended for those who prioritize facts over partisanship and who want to understand how the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War II came about.

Video interview conducted by Pascal Lottaz, Neutrality Studies. Premiered on August 5, 2025: “Today I’m talking to Benoît Paré, a French army reserve officer and former defense ministry analyst. Most importantly, Mr. Paré worked for the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), as part of the seize-fire monitoring mission in Eastern Ukraine. He also wrote a book about this experiences in the Donbas with the title “What I saw in Ukraine: 2015-2022, Diary of an international Observer”.”

#28. Russian propaganda?

  • Original post published: July 29, 2020, in: Multerland blog
  • Edited: July 30, 2020
  • Edited: July 06, 2025 – Note: In the meantime we passed the year 2022, in which, named like that: the Russian Special Project started. In the post below I write that Russian politics, like all politics world wide, are not reliable. That was in 2020, when I was not up to date about the developments in Kiev, Ukraine, the coup there in 2014, the provoked war, etc. etc. All what is related with that is to be found in my blog Sustainable Politics, that I started in 2023, after my LinkedIn posts/comments had been censored because of EU guidelines and my account had been suspended for a short time: I was even named a Russian Troll there. But there is more, and since the war in Ukraine, all what happened there, and in USA, Europe, my political knowledge about Russia has become real in-depth knowledge, fact checked, after having been informed about Putin, Lavrov, the provoking aggressive role of NATO, USA, EU, in the Ukraine war, etc., by the highest reliable of the west’s political scientists and investigative journalists. You can find a gallery, and a list of them here. My answer on the question, that I asked myself in 2020: into which direction I would run in case needed: I would still, now, 2025, run into the direction of Russia, but taking my Acousticom2 with me to find a green place to live, because also in Russia the radiation from man-made EMF is too high. RNCNIRP is an advisory commission. Not a governmental EMF safety guidelines decision makers commission. Read more about RNCNIRP here.

July 29, 2020

The publications in the media about the Russian decision to ban Wi-Fi and smartphones from schools, are obviously considered to be Russian propaganda, by “Telecom” [see tweet].

What is “Russian propaganda”?

“The propaganda of the Russian Federation is propaganda that promotes views, perceptions or agendas of the government of Russia. The media include state-run outlets and online technologies,[3][4] and may involve using “Soviet-style ‘active measures‘ as an element of modern Russian ‘political warfare‘””.[5]    Read more here. (Wikipedia)

The new guidelines for schools, and online learning at home, as presented by the ministry of health in Russia, are created by RusCNIRP, a group of independent scientists who have studied EMF and experienced electromagnetic radiation on volunteering humans, in Russia. RusCNIRP has found highly alarming research results concerning the health of all human beings, especially for the foetus, babies, children, and teenagers. Not only for Russians, not only for Russian foetuses, babies, children and teenagers, but for all human beings. Science is not politically interested, not owned by politics and governments.

“Russian propaganda” as it essentially is, is not related at all with what the Ministry of Health in Moscow has decided about schools and online learning at home, but the decision of the Russian Ministry of Health opens indeed a very nice crystal clear view on Russia and the care of Russians for their children.

The “Free West”?

“Russian propaganda” is an expression for those outside Russia who like to influence the opinion of the crowds who live in the so-called “free west”, where all can say what they like to say [but nobody listens]. The “free” west does not exist. In the free west the so-called free people have become the slaves of the industry that rules all the governments, via the votes of these slaves, via a fake democratic system. In the free west people really believe they are free.

Capitalism and Communism

Russia is not different from the “free west”, since also there political systems restrict the people’s freedom: the Tsar was thrown from the throne in 1917 and other types of “Tsars” took over the totalitarian power. The “free west”points to Russia as an unfree state, Russia points to the west for the same. The industry in both East and West has during the era of the industrialisation taken over the reigns of politics[see article]. Capitalism is now also blossoming where communism was and even IS dictated. Communism is essentially an utterly social “ism”, but the world was not ready for it and one cannot force human evolution by violence, as happened in Russia, as happens in China, and why communist countries are factually not communist at all. Capitalism rules also in China, North Korea, everywhere. Also EU is not different from what is happening in Russia, in USA. The industry is the absolute totalitarian power where all world politics are merchandisers for. The crisis we are in is a result of blind capitalism, and the inborn and stimulated by industry greed of human beings.

Painting: Polish artist Zdzisław Beksiński, without a title. For me it is the blind monster industry that eats human beings. All walk in his wide opened mouth, something inside urges them to go in it (greed) and they do not see where they walk into. Their mind is sleeping. They are blind also. Not aware of what is happening: that they will be transformed into the faeces of the monster. Humans are the industry’s waste.

“If freedom is here, what does prison look like?”

“If freedom is here, what does prison look like?” Source

The so-called “free west” is scaremongering people for Russia, because the so-called “free west” people could lose their freedom, their free choice, their free will, when Russia is going to become too powerful. Which freedom?

“If freedom is here, what does prison look like?” Source

Well,

  • when reading the news about 5G, the way it is rolled out and the speed of the rollout
  • when discovering the total absence of any industrial scientific research of the biological effects of 5G
  • when learning about the support of the “free” west of corrupted safety guidelines decision makers groups like ICNIRP, FCC, ARPANSA, Safety Code 6 [See also: wikipedia]
  • when reading about the role of the corrupted WHO
  • when reading about Bill Gates, vaccines, the totally absurd, insane, unnecessary vaccine cocktail of till about 16 different vaccines, where parents of new born babies in USA are obliged to agree with. Read article Children’s Health Defense

…then I wonder in what kind of a freedom we live in. Then I do not wonder which side I should choose if it comes to choices:

I would choose for Russia.

My view on Russia

Choosing for Russia is not a synonym for agreeing with their politics, though I understand the Russian revolution, though I love their hymn, and though I understand the essence of communism. As a child I felt the enormous fear of both my parents, when the news came that Russia invaded Hungary [1956]. I was 8 years old. When there was ever something to be afraid of, later, I translated it automatically into “Russians”. My father hated Stalin, deeply, he hated communism, the communist leaders, and I did not understand it then, but later I did, and I agreed. I learned later that politics is not the same as culture. I learned from my mother the love for the Russian dances and music, but I also felt and feel love for for instance Spanish dances, Hungarian dances, all traditional dances and music. I dislike the music of the American cowboys however, their arrogant view on the American indigenous people, and their  “country and western” music. I can not listen to it.

I love nature. As Russians do. Love for nature is deeply rooted in the Russian soul. I feel the same. When it comes to choices, I choose for Russia. If I had to run for my life, I would run to Russia, not to the USA.

My view on the USA

America was a glorious country, for me, Americans were heroes: born some years after WWII out of parents who witnessed the war in the Netherlands, and who experienced Americans as liberators, I only heard positive words, and deep respect. America was glorified. My view on America changed during my life and on a certain moment I really did not understand why people would like to go there, to live there, or to go for a holiday there. The American glory of 1945 must have created an addiction in Americans to glory itself, to play the role of the liberator everywhere in the world, and to interfere finally in politics where they did not have the right to. The greed of their ancestors, who invaded America, was and is obviously in the DNA of the Americans: they never stopped to invade, and their out of the cowboy-guns derived advanced war industry helped them to win insane cruel wars. During the last decades the American glory faded out. Then there was Trump with: “We Make America Great Again!”

His politics have speeded up the rotting process of USA that started when Columbus arrived on that continent. He exposes the enormous numbers of far-right voters, Trump voters, the fake holiness of Christians in USA, who made it happen that Trump won. “It was meant to be, and a sign of God”. Most probably all this could happen because white-supremacy-America has no authentic culture, with roots far back in history, from the beginning of mankind: Americans of the present are the heirs of the fortune hunters from Europe. All what was authentic American has been stolen, killed, removed, ridiculed, humiliated, and this has not stopped yet: the indigenous people of America who are still alive still live in reservations and have no rights. The white supremacy overruled not only the indigenous people, but also the by white supremacists from Africa into America entered black people, the white man’s slaves, and all other human colours that appeared in USA, and are trying to enter right now the USA: “Go back where you came from!“. But the new Americans are awaking already a long time, and times and American society are finally really changing. The white supremacists feel backed into a corner, and act in the same way as those who invaded America, and killed all who were trying to defend their property and were opposing them. There is a revival of the cowboy mentality and it is supported by their self chosen pro-cowboy government. But much more intense: it is now a political movement.

That Americans [together with the British, Canadians, Polish and Russians] liberated Europe from Nazi Germany, stays a fact where we, Europeans, are eternally grateful for. The new fact is that Nazism is now experiencing a new dawn in the USA itself.

It is the world wide governing American, by politics funded and supported industries, and out of this American industry mentality born Russian, Chinese, Iranian, African, South American, Australian, Canadian, and European industries, which rule humanity, life on Earth. The shallow life-style in industrial countries is comparable with the shallow lifestyle as presented in the many Hollywood films, which have polluted the view of humans on sexuality and respect, world wide. The seed of the rottenness of the entire world started to grow in Hollywood, and infected via the Hollywood films all peoples of the world. Telecom industry is derived from America’s film industry, and America’s war industry, that found propaganda for it via the film industry and nowadays via the gaming industry, a side product of the film industry. Telecom uses psychological ways to hide its own propaganda by blaming Russia for what it is doing itself. Wake up, peoples of the world, stop to be sheeples [for those who think I wrote it wrong: sheeples is combination of sheep and peoples].

Conclusion

The claim of the telecommunications industry that the in Russia banned smartphones and Wi-Fi from schools should be considered as Russian propaganda, is a dirty lie, and propaganda itself, merchandising, manipulating the mind of the “free west” peoples, in order to achieve that the sheeples will say no to a sane, ethical decision of Russians. Sanity and ethics are missing in the telecom industry, in all industries, the multi nationals. Everywhere. Governments should disconnect from the industry and their catastrophic economic fetishism. The Russian Ministry of Health did. If there is a future, it must be in Russia. The signs are there that they can think.

Note: the mentioned tweet in the first sentence was published by Susan Foster. Susan Foster lives in Colorado, USA, writes articles for Children’s Health Defense, and is Honorary Firefighter of the San Diego Fire Department; US Adviser EM Radiation Research Trust (UK). See: Twitter. Her timeline on Twitter also shows how the situation in the USA is escalating.

One of Susan Foster’s tweets contains the following video. The YouTube channel shows more of the USA, where pro-American governments are willing to cooperate with, and not with Russia. Russian politics are, as all politics, indeed not reliable, but the Russian culture, art and science is still very strong and of a high quality. Russia is part of geological Europe.  So, EU, do not blame me for choosing for Russia. It is born out of your own totalitarian politics, by hiding details about 5G, by mandating 5G, your undemocratic politics about so-called safety guidelines for EMF by choosing for the ICNIRP monopoly, mandating unhealthy, unnecessary vaccines, denying the facts of pesticides, neonicotinoids, that kill life in soils, and by cooperating with a country that is reigned by “Gestapo Trump“. Washing hands in innocence, pretending to be leaders, our truthful leaders, walking like cowardly sheep behind Big “Brother” USA.

Additional:

#25. An Assassinated Swedish Prime Minister and the NATO Connection

The title and text of this article have been originally published on YouTube1, on April 25, 2025, by Thomas Karat2. The footnotes have been added by the administrator of this blog, “Sustainable Politics“. Thomas Karat published an extended article about the subject on his Substack, on April 25, 2025: “How Sweden Was Covertly Manipulated Into Joining NATO“3

An Assassinated Swedish Prime Minister4 and the NATO Connection
Sweden didn’t join NATO. It was taken.

In this explosive interview with Professor Ola Tunander, Professor Emeritis at the International Peace Research Institute in Oslo, Norway 5, Thomas Karat traces a four-decade operation to assassinate not just a Prime Minister—but a national identity.

🔍 From the fake submarine scare of the 1980s (spoiler: it was NATO, not the Soviets)…
🕵️ To the still-unsolved murder of Olof Palme—the last real obstacle to U.S. military integration…
💣 To NATO’s secret terror networks operating across Europe under the guise of “stay-behind armies”…
🧠 To the media, academics, and political elites who programmed Sweden to fear peace and beg for protection…

This video exposes how Sweden’s neutrality was not outdated—it was inconvenient.
And so, over 40 years, it was dismantled. Covertly. Methodically. Democratically… in appearance only.
No vote. No public debate. Just manipulation disguised as consensus.
This isn’t a documentary. It’s a post-mortem.
Watch until the end to understand how democracies die—not with bullets, but with narratives.

Time Stamps:
00:00 Intro
05:50 Who is Ola
06:45 How to fool your counterpart
12:15 The dubious case of Sweden
19:30 A former empire pushes for war
27:55 The coming war with Russia
34:25 Stay behind armies
51:20 Deception to create terror
57:15 Swedens U-boat hoax
59:40 Whiskey on the rocks
01:10:06 How to manipulate a population
01:14:25 Sweden joins NATO
01:24:25 Who killed Olov Palme

Video is back upped in this blog: click

Transcript, starting at 01:24:256 with the chapter: “Who killed Olof Palme?” (no timeline)

TK: I cannot avoid talking with you without mentioning all of Palmer’s assassination, so very very broadly, I mean first of all for people who do not know all of Palme web then prime minister of Sweden was assassinated by a lone gunman on the street on his way to or from a cinema with his wife, and this assassination has not been solved till today.
Now it’s it’s probably also worth mentioning that this happened just one or two days before Omarov par was supposed to travel to Moscow to meet Gorbachev, to have uh discussions about a the daunt between Sweden and and Russia and of course that you already said that the elite, the military elite and maybe also the industrial elite in Sweden the second part of you know the second part of Sweden was not in favor of all of Palme so if I would ask you who I mean, not not asking which the person yeah but which interest group and maybe in the back of our minds still uh stay behind yeah, I do not know yeah, so which group of interest do you think might be responsible for all of Palmer’s assassination?

OT: Firstly, uh he was going to Moscow one month, not one two days after, but one month after uh after the the killing so it was going in the first days of April or something like that and he was shot on the 28th of February but uh and uh I think that it’s clear that that he had
been he he wanted to have a he he started uh what was called an investigation or a commission from the collab related to the United Nation with Americans and Russians and uh some other Europeans and some from the third world also uh to find out about the possible uh change the closer collaboration with the great powers that was the idea, i mean it was called common security so it was the idea was that that the security of you your security is not you are not secure if you are if the other side does not feel secure so you you have to think in terms of how the other side thinks and uh on the Russian side were Yorgi Arbatov who was a close advisor to the to the Soviet leadership and also the very close adviser to Garbachov and and uh on the American side it was Cyrus Vance who had been under secretary of state and maybe also secretary of state for Yeah, uh so he, the idea was to collaborate and this was unacceptable for the for the Reagan administration at the time and for Thatcher so so they were they were strongly against this kind of collaboration and uh and it became impossible after the submarine incident started it was impossible for Wul of Palmer to have normal relationship with the Soviet Union because of the media situation in Sweden so so and in 1986 he went against uh the the media actually and uh and what you had also at the time you had in autumn of 88 85 a few months before you had what was called the naval officers revolt which was a a group of naval officers uh claiming that Ulf Palmer was not uh trustworthy that he one believed that he was collaborating with the Soviets and what you had was for example uh submarines that you knew you have indication clear indication of submarines and suddenly when the submarine was on its way out they received ceasefire order so they had to let the submarine out and for the people at the time there it was obvious that it was Soviet submarines so it must have been so they believed that Ulf Palmer must have let the submarines out in collaboration with the Soviets that that was uh the case and they then thought that Olaf Palmer was a traitor and uh and for example the head of this uh this so-called naval officers revolt Hans von Hofston who was a commander alo not very senior officer he he he his ——superior told Swedish TV that uh yeah he was informed about the meetings of some of this group it was also it was police officers also and they uh they had discussed how to get rid of Olaf Palmer they had not discussed any specific method to kill him but they had discussed how to get get rid of him and u and then Olaf Palma’s uh close advisor and state secretary Ulan told that he and Olaf Palmer was informed about these meetings and what he remember also was that they had had [1:31:17] done Hitler salute

TK: you said so you said so yeah no but yeah

OT: so that and so this was what you would call uh right-wing groups inside the the police forces and inside the navy and uh and some of these forces is were probably linked also to the stay-behinds actually so it was at the in the night uh when Olof Palme was shot it was a stay behind exercise in the area where he was shot, and that was the reason why people have seen uh men with walkie-talkies and so on because there were no mobile phones at the time and uh and um and that was and it was also kind of quite uh it’s some documents that had been made public now from the inquiry and there was a security service document claiming that it was this special exercise was also dealing with uh assassinations and and to take out people who were so-called carrier of information and these people were uh it was the idea the exercise the you know it started with that where an enemy had taken over Stockholm area, and of course that would be then Soviet Union had taken over Stockholm area, and uh and you had small groups coming in special force groups and and stay behind groups or kind of stay-behind groups, coming in from outside, uh setting up headquarters in the Stockholm area, and uh and one task would then be to eliminate certain people, so they so the enemy should not be able to take care of them.

TK: Was there not a list published with names or am I confusing this now, was there not a list of targets published?

OT: no I don’t think so

TK: okay

OT: i I I but this was a uh this that I refer to now was security service document and that tried to analyze the situation so to speak and and um so I I think we don’t know exactly who who did it who did it but but we know much more today than we knew just10 years ago and 10 years ago we knew much more than we knew 20 years ago so at least we know something and and uh and you could say that it’s very clear which interests that that thought that Olaf Palmer was a a very problematic person he had powerful enemies within Sweden within UK within America and I just saw that President Nixon already called him the Swedish pardon my French and accused him to be an agent and KGB influence agents yeah that goes already back to Nixon yeah I mean Nixon called him that Swedish but but uh this was agent of influence i know that James Jesus Angleton who was a CIA counter intelligence guy for 20 years or something like that he was he was kicked out actually by Bill Colby that I mentioned before uh in 1975 and but he the Swedish uh the Swedish counter intelligence chief for the Swedish security service had Angleton as his opposite number and visiting him at Langley and uh that was CIA headquarters and and and he and and Angleton had told that he considered Olaf Palmer as an agent of influence and for these kind of people in Sweden what the Americans told was the truth so to speak so so so they they they so they had they considered him a kind of agent of influence and and they also he said that they could not report he didn’t write down in the files about Olaf Palmer because we have a traitor at uh at the security service Mikuel Bentler because he was a traitor because he spoke with Olaf Palmer he spoke with he he reported to the prime minister what is that what the security service were doing what a crime yeah yes so that was a so so that was um I think another indication of a divided Sweden

Footnotes

  1. YouTube video: An Assassinated Swedish Prime Minister and the NATO Connection https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCeAbk4C18E ↩︎
  2. Substack, About Thomas Karat https://karat.substack.com/about ↩︎
  3. How Sweden Was Covertly Manipulated Into Joining NATO
    https://karat.substack.com/p/how-sweden-was-covertly-manipulated ↩︎
  4. Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme https://www.palmecenter.se/eng/about-palme-center/about-olof-palme/ ↩︎
  5. Ola Tunander is Professor Emeritis at the International Peace Research Institute in Oslo, Norway https://www.prio.org/people/5044 ↩︎
  6. View on YT: https://youtu.be/jCeAbk4C18E?t=5065&si=ElJPbxYlTRE8m2Tt ↩︎

#22. Koblenko

[Laatste update: Mei 1, 2025]

Ik hoor er niet meer bij…

Maar ik hoorde er wel bij. Ik ging ook regelmatig in, en met de stroom mee, dat voelt lekker, samen, heerlijk, we zijn het eens, ja, inderdaad, Poetin deugt niet, moet je kijken, dat jacht dat besteld was in Italië. Bijvoorbeeld. Maar tegelijkertijd was er ook altijd iets wat niet alleen ik zag, wanneer, zoals in mijn geval, kijkend naar die ene documentaire over hem die, hoe merkwaardig is dat, nu niet meer terug te vinden is bij NPO Uitzending Gemist, in die enorme waslijst die aangereikt wordt daar wanneer je de zoekterm “Poetin” gebruikt, of zie ik die over het hoofd1? Hoe dan ook: ik werd me bewust, onderwijl kijkend, observerend, invoelend, luisterend: hij deugt.
Ik kon daarom niet begrijpen waarom hij Oekraïne binnenviel.
Nu, 2025, drie jaren verder en enorm veel historisch wetenschappelijk onderzoeksmateriaal, achtergrondinformatie en details rijker, begrijp ik waarom hij Oekraïne binnenviel.
En…, iedereen die de feiten kent, zou hetzelfde gedaan hebben.

Daarom: ik hoor er niet meer bij.
Ik schrijf dit nadat ik weer geconfronteerd werd met personen of een persoon, waar ik niet meer bij wil horen, maar die ik ondanks mijn pogingen hen te mijden, toch “tegen het lijf loop” in dit geval, via het scherm van mijn computer omdat ik als een in Noorwegen wonende Nederlandse graag af en toe naar niet-politieke, Nederlandse, ontspannende uitzendingen kijk, zoals Bed&Breakfast, Boer Zoekt Vrouw of RailAway. De overdosis aan negativiteit in de politieke wereld van vandaag moet worden gecompenseerd, nu en dan.

Maar….

Wat je ook opent, welke omroepzender dan ook, met de eigen talk show, de reclame spotjes —zelfs dat: adverteren door een omroep voor bijvoorbeeld “De kinderen van Rutte”2, een TV serie over Rutte die lesgeeft, die het volk moet overtuigen dat Rutte een waar-achtig mens zou zijn met een hart—je wordt ongevraagd en ongewild met propaganda geconfronteerd, en dus heb ik een trailer van die serie gezien. De Rutte propaganda wordt gewoon pal vóór een populair programma ingelast, zonder enige aankondiging, hoe slim, en het naïve volk, zich verkneukelend op wat er gaat komen, wordt ermee ingewreven, zapt niet, want men wil het komende programma niet missen, geen seconde ervan. Je kunt geen beter psychologisch perfect gekozen moment bedenken. Dus gebeurde dat ook.

“Bar Laat”, over Loretta Schrijver, met Jeroen Pauw en hé, Koblenko zit ook aan tafel.

Wanneer je uiteindelijk, nu, 2025 —na een leven lang geleefd te hebben (geboren in 1948), en mezelf verdiept te hebben in wat het westen is, terwijl ik leef in dat westen, en dus een constante waarnemer ben, een ervaringsdeskundige, een kritisch geworden ervaringsdeskundige— dan toch een keer meekijkt met het anders gemeden “Bar Laat”, vanwege het overlijden van Loretta Schrijver, en verwachtende dat Jeroen Pauw aanwezig zou zijn als gast, en ja, die was aanwezig, want samengewerkt met Loretta en jarenlang haar geliefde geweest, dan zit daar ook Victoria Koblenko aan tafel als, jawel, politicoloog.3 Ik heb na de intro van “Bar Laat”, met Jeroen Pauw, niet verder gekeken, want geen zin in Koblenko of enige andere gast.

Koblenko: politicoloog?

Koblenko heeft inderdaad politicologie gestudeerd in Leiden—las ik in Wikipedia4, bij gebrek aan een website van haar die adequate informatie biedt, want “under construction”—en behaalde het bachelor niveau. Maar ben je met alleen een bachelor diploma ook inderdaad een politicoloog?

Dat Koblenko absoluut niet op de hoogte is van de historische en politieke feiten in Oekraïne, terwijl ze gevraagd wordt om haar zegje te doen als zelf-benoemd “expert” in allerlei talk-shows en via lezingen, getuigen haar eigen woorden, waarin duidelijk wordt aan welke kant zij staat5. Ze heeft zelfs een interview6 gemaakt met wat men noemt “de first lady van Oekraïne”, terwijl die helemaal geen first lady meer is, omdat de termijn van de man in het groene T-shirt officieel verstreken is, en omdat we inmiddels weten wie die man in dat groene T-shirt werkelijk is… , en daarom zou Koblenko geen interview met die “lady” hebben moeten willen afnemen. Voor de vele feiten over Zelensky verwijs ik graag naar de echte Oekraïne deskundigen, die te vinden zijn in dit blog.

Hoe die oorlog is begonnen, waarom, wat er in het zuidoosten van Oekraïne aan oorlogsgeweld plaatsvond vanuit en door Kiev zelf, met raketaanvallen, terreur, volkerenmoord en meer, omdat er Russen wonen die zich, terecht overigens en vooral begrijpelijk want gediscrimineerd door Kiev, niet wilden conformeren met de pro USA regering die na de door USA georkestreerde coup in 2014 zitting nam in Kiev, en wat allemaal terug te vinden is in door onderzoeksjournalisten gemaakte opnames aldaar: ze weet het niet, hoeft kennelijk niets te lezen, want “door geboorte deskundig” omdat ze geboren is in Oekraïne, in 1980, in Vinnytsja7. Dat is 45 jaren geleden. Ze verhuisde mee met haar ouders (waarom verhuisden die?) naar Nederland in 1992, dat is 32 jaren geleden. De omstandigheden in de relatie tussen Oekraïne en Rusland waren toen bovendien totaal anders dan die nu zijn.
Welke informatiebronnen zij gebruikt is niet te achterhalen omdat haar website8 nog in opbouw is. Hoelang al? Wanneer mensen haar vragen naar informatie over Oekraïne is zij verplicht aan te kunnen tonen waar zij die vandaan haalt, zodat men weet of datgene wat zij gaat vertellen pro-Oekraïne is of tegen-Oekraïne want zij volgt daadwerkelijk de mensen die Oekraïne afbreken, en schuldig zijn aan de moord op Oekraïners door hen de oorlog in te sturen. Alle details en feiten zijn o.a. in dit blog te vinden.

Er is vooral in Oekraïne een enorm gebrek aan betrouwbare bronnen, en dat wordt aangetoond door het feit dat de oppositiepartij-leider Oleksandr Dubinsky ….. in een Oekraïense gevangenis zit en geen contact mag onderhouden met de buitenwereld. Professor Glenn Diesen9, heeft desondanks een interview10 met hem weten te regelen.

Koblenko wil ooit terug. Naar wat? En als wie?

De doden die zijn gevallen waren nog in leven geweest wanneer Koblenko en politieke soortgenoten begonnen waren met het bestuderen van de feiten die de mainstream media niet melden, want verplicht om westerse propaganda te kopiëren, te plakken en te publiceren, waardoor het eenvoudig blijft om de rode draad in een talk show te houden, en alles als “wij gelijkgezinden onder elkaar” naar buiten toe uit te stralen, met hier en daar wellicht—want zo ging het altijd—een andere stem, die dan toch weer overstemd werd door een andere gast gekozen door de propaganda machine achter de schermen.

Het Oekraïne zoals dit door de mainstream media getoond wordt bestaat niet. De realiteit is anders, maar dan moet je willen en durven kijken. Koblenko kijkt niet. Het Oekraïne dat zij verliet bestaat niet meer. Het is mogelijk dat er een heel andere wind gaat waaien in Oekraïne, wanneer Oleksandr Dubinsky (zie voetnoot 7) president zou worden. Er zijn nog geen verkiezingen geweest. Zelensky wil aanblijven. Doorvechten. Nog meer Oekraïners moeten worden afgeslacht.

Het Nederlandse schatkist-geld is op

De talk show “Bar Laat” begon, net zoals alle omroepen dat doen momenteel, met het laten zien van deze advertentie: Laat de Publieke Omroep Niet Wegbezuinigen11.

Ook die advertentie had er helemaal niet hoeven te zijn, wanneer Nederland zichzelf niet arm gemaakt had aan de oorlog in Oekraïne, door ook Nederland zelf geprovoceerd, want lid van NAVO, en dan had al dat geld in de staatskas kunnen blijven, de Groningers eindelijk hun huizen gekregen die beloofd zijn door nu-NAVO secretaris, dan hadden de slachtoffers van de belastingaffaire allemaal gekregen wat hun beloofd was, want hun recht, dan was er geen energiecrisis geweest, geen inflatie, dan waren er geen bezuinigingen nodig geweest op onderwijs, gezondheidszorg, en nu dus de omroepen, en dan had Koblenko gewoon nu al terug kunnen keren naar een Oekraïne dat, zoals voor de coup in 2014, nauw samenwerkte, in vrede, met Rusland.

Update, Maart 31, 2025 / Dat de Nederlandse schatkist leger en leger wordt (hoe bijzonder, dat woord “leger” in deze context) komt onder meer ook door wat in de nieuwsbrief12 van Investigate Europe staat geschreven over ook het Nederlandse “leger”: “Europese leiders beloven de defensie-uitgaven te verhogen. Er worden miljarden euro’s vrijgemaakt om nationale legers te versterken en gezamenlijke militaire initiatieven uit te breiden.”

Koblenko is met haar Ruslandhaat-campagne een voor een oorlogszuchtig EU belangrijk psychologisch wapen om een sterk vijandbeeld te creëren, dat nodig is om de goedkeuring van het [ten onrechte] russofoob13 gemaakte volk af te dwingen voor de noodzaak van onverantwoorde want volstrekt onnodige financiële uitgaven van een groter leger en meer wapens, dat alleen het imago van Brussel dient, want de schaamte voor de overigens lang geleden al voorspelde nederlaag in die door NAVO/USA/EU uitgedaagde oorlog moet verstopt worden. Dat vijandbeeld is precies wat Koblenko aan het volk “verkoopt” in talk shows, lezingen en ook “Libelle”, één van de allereerste -opgericht in 1934- en meest gelezen damesbladen in Nederland en Vlaams België14, waarin o.a. haar interview met “de first lady van Oekraïne” verscheen1516. Professor Glenn Diesen schreef een boek over russofobie17.

Katchanovski

Jij, Koblenko, verdient geld met westerse propaganda, en ondermijnt daarmee elke vorm van toekomst voor Oekraïne.
Neem eens serieus de tijd voor een echte studie, en begin met Dr. Ivan Katchanovski18. Ook een Oekraïner, een politieke wetenschapper, moedig, want de feiten tot op de bodem onderzoekend, en ermee naar buiten komend ook19, tegen de stroom van de verraders en huichelaars in, de gehersenspoelden, ondanks de gevaren ervan, omdat tegen de stroom in denken en handelen gevaarlijk is, zoals Gonzalo Lira20 heeft moeten ervaren.
Er zijn diverse westerse onafhankelijke onderzoeksjournalisten die het leven zuur gemaakt is, en wordt.
Er zijn zelfs westerse dissidenten die het westen ontvlucht zijn. Waaronder bijvoorbeeld Oekraïne onderzoeker Eva Karene Bartlett21 (documentaires Donbass22), en Ben Norton23 (China)

Wanneer klaar met het bestuderen van de onderzoeken van Dr. Ivan Katchanovski: ga verder met Dr. Jeffrey D. Sachs24, Dr. Glenn Diesen25, etc.26.

Zeer selectief zijn, leren wat betrouwbaar is en waarom

Zomaar iets kiezen uit de door YouTube aangereikte lijst na het gebruik van zoektermen levert info op die onbetrouwbaar kan zijn, misleidend, of zelfs gelogen en dus af te raden.
Gedurende de afgelopen jaren heb ik deze lijst27 samengesteld met namen, die te checken zijn, via websites, en die 100% betrouwbaar zijn gebleken. Er zijn inmiddels ook personen door mij weer van die lijst verwijderd, wanneer bleek dat die onwaarheden verkondigden, waarvan ik zeker wist dat het onwaarheden waren, of aannames, want niet bewezen. Ook personen die te kennen gaven in videos bijvoorbeeld pro-Trump te zijn, omdat het een held zou zijn, die een aanslag overleefde, zijn verwijderd.
Ik streef naar neutraliteit, naar verifieerbare waarheden. De geschiedenis liegt niet, maar het westen verzwijgt wel heel bewust en zorgvuldig delen van de geschiedenis, of negeert die, gemakshalve. Er is volop materiaal verzameld om mee aan de slag te gaan. Dit geldt voor iedereen die wakker wil worden. Ik voer geen Russische propaganda, ik publiceer logica, feiten, en indien die feiten door Russen worden verteld, want gecontroleerd waar, dan zou ik de waarheid onrecht aandoen door die feiten links te laten liggen. Datzelfde geldt voor iedere wereldburger. Ook voor jou, Koblenko.

Politicoloog?

Tot je werkelijk op de hoogte bent, Koblenko: verwijder de titel politicoloog.
Je bent het niet voordat de titel “Dr.” voor je naam staat, maar zelfs dan ben je nog niet per se Oekraïne-Rusland deskundige. Daar komt veel en veel meer bij kijken.
Je toont aan dat je gewoon simpelweg en rechtuit gezegd: onwetend bent, zelfs bewust onwetend omdat er overal correcte neutrale informatie te vinden is, en omdat je jezelf politicoloog noemt ben je mijns inziens verplicht het volk voor te lichten met feiten, niet met wat “cherry-picking” feitjes, of wat 1-dags impressies, wat gevoelens betreffende Kiev en de voornaam van je zoon, een interview met een Oekraïne-onwaardige persoon die samen met wie zij haar man noemt in Canada applaudisseerde voor een Duitse nazi veteraan28, haar “man” volgt terwijl ze weet dat die vuile oorlog door toedoen van haar man realiteit werd door te luisteren naar Boris Johnson29, doch gestopt had kunnen worden, en weet van de jaarlijkse pro Bandera30 tochten in Kiev (of weet je dat niet Koblenko?), nee, de volle waarheid, tot in alle complexe details en sub details.

Laatste nieuws, ook voor jou, Koblenko

01. Kit Klarenberg: ECHR Finds Ukraine Responsible for Odessa Massacre31
Gepubliceerd: Maart 30, 2025
Op: Substack

02. Update: April 1, 2025: Een propaganda artikel in de New York Times, geanalyseerd door professor Pascal Lottaz, Neutrality Studies. “New York Times: De VS neemt alle operationele beslissingen in Oekraïne en wil dat er meer Oekraïners sterven.” / “New York Times: USA Running All Operational Decisions in Ukraine, Wants More Ukrainians To Die.32”

03. Update: April 10, 2025: Een video, gepubliceerd door Judge Andrew Napolitano: Prof. Glenn Diesen : Ukraine, Tariffs, and Europe.

04. Update: Mei 1, 2025: Een video, gepubliceerd door Prof. Glenn Diesen – Patrik Baab: German War Propaganda in the Ukraine War – en een andere video met Patrik Baab, gepubliceerd door Prof. Pascal Lottaz, Neutrality Studies, medio April: German War Journalist REVEALS Realities in Ukraine | Patrik Baab

Verklaring

Natuurlijk zou ik beschouwd kunnen worden als iemand die ook kopieert en plakt, als een papegaai fungeert, betreffende het intellectuele gedachtegoed van alle genoemde wetenschappers. Echter. Mijn eigen goed ontwikkelde autonome denken vond herkenning in wat die wetenschappers vertelden, heb het ervaren als het grootste intellectuele goed dat een mens kan ontvangen. Eindelijk kwamen er echte denkers op mijn pad, betreffende de wereldpolitiek en wereldgeschiedenis. Alle puzzelstukjes vielen op hun plek met hetgeen zij aanreikten.

Voetnoten:

  1. NPO, Uitzending Gemist, zoekterm Poetin https://npo.nl/start/zoeken?zoekTerm=Poetin ↩︎
  2. NPO, Uitzending Gemist, Serie: De kinderen van Rutte https://npo.nl/start/serie/kinderen-van-rutte/seizoen-1/de-kinderen-van-rutte/afspelen ↩︎
  3. NPO, Uitzending Gemist, Bar Laat, Uitzending donderdag 27 maart 2025, aflevering 49 – https://npo.nl/start/serie/bar-laat/seizoen-2/bar-laat_114/afspelen ↩︎
  4. Wikipedia, Victoria Koblenko, studie: “Tijdens haar vaste rol in GTST studeerde ze tussen 1999 en 2008 Politicologie en Ruslandkunde aan de Universiteit Leiden. Ruslandkunde maakte ze niet af. In 2008 behaalde ze een bachelordiploma voor de studie Politicologie.”  https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Koblenko#Vroegere_levensloop ↩︎
  5. RTL: Victoria Koblenko staat stil bij drie jaar ‘onmenselijke wreedheid’ in moederland https://www.rtl.nl/boulevard/entertainment/artikel/5496090/victoria-koblenko-staat-stil-bij-3-jaar-oorlog-oekraine ↩︎
  6. RTL: Victoria Koblenko voor het eerst terug in Oekraïne sinds invasie: ‘Een reis die me diep raakte’ https://www.rtl.nl/boulevard/entertainment/artikel/5484451/victoria-koblenko-oekraine-terug-sinds-oorlog ↩︎
  7. Vinnytsja [De Oekraïense luchtmacht heeft sinds 1992 haar hoofdkwartier in Vinnytsja] https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinnytsja ↩︎
  8. Website Victoria Koblenko: Coming Soon https://victoriakoblenko.nl ↩︎
  9. Glenn Diesen is a professor of Russian international affairs, with focus on geo-economics, conservatism and the Greater Eurasia Initiative. Substack: https://glenndiesen.substack.com ↩︎
  10. Oleksandr Dubinsky, interview published March 28, 2025, in Glenn Diesen’s YT channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7K8OSIant8 ↩︎
  11. Laat de Publieke Omroep Niet Wegbezuinigen https://nieuwgeneco.nl/steun-actie-medewerkers-publieke-omroep/ ↩︎
  12. Nieuwsbrief Maart 31, 2025, Investigate Europe https://0rr1w.mjt.lu/nl3/t61DrnmdVe7L0s1RoqUcLA ↩︎
  13. Nederlands woordenboek, russofoob https://www.woorden.org/woord/russofoob ↩︎
  14. Libelle, tijdschrift, opgericht in 1934 https://wikikids.nl/Libelle_(tijdschrift) ↩︎
  15. Libelle, interview Koblenko https://www.libelle.nl/cs-b8a76b7a/ ↩︎
  16. Libelle, overzicht bijdragen Koblenko https://www.libelle.nl/tag/victoria-koblenko ↩︎
  17. Professor Glenn Diesen – Russophobia: Propaganda in International Politics https://www.amazon.com/Russophobia-Propaganda-International-Glenn-Diesen/dp/9811914672/ Boekoverzicht Glenn Diesen: https://backups.blog/books/ ↩︎
  18. List, Ivan Katchanovski https://backups.blog/political-analysts-experts/ ↩︎
  19. ResearchGate: Ivan Katchanovski https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ivan-Katchanovski ↩︎
  20. The Grayzone: American citizen Gonzalo Lira dies from neglect in Ukrainian prison https://thegrayzone.com/2024/01/12/gonzalo-lira-dies-ukrainian-prison/ ↩︎
  21. Backups.blog: Eva Karene Bartlett, Award Winning Independent Journalist https://backups.blog/2024/04/04/10-eva-karene-bartlett/ ↩︎
  22. Donbass, Ukraine – Eva Karene Bartlett https://ingaza.wordpress.com/the-donbass-my-articles-videos-interviews-from-on-the-donetsk-lugansk-peoples-republics-2019-present/ ↩︎
  23. Ben Norton, YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@GeopoliticalEconomyReport ↩︎
  24. Jeffrey D. Sachs, website https://www.jeffsachs.org, Videos: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDsR5P9Lkw3PeHMjPW-xF2cn-wu8ZBo7M ↩︎
  25. Glenn Diesen: Substack https://glenndiesen.substack.com, Books: https://backups.blog/books/ ↩︎
  26. Political Analysts https://backups.blog/political-analysts-experts/ ↩︎
  27. Political Analysts https://backups.blog/political-analysts-experts/ ↩︎
  28. NBC News https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/canada-speaker-apologizes-ukraine-nazi-veteran-honored-rcna117125 ↩︎
  29. The Grayzone, Boris Johnson admits Ukraine broke peace deal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDmGs1BM8gM ↩︎
  30. Bandera, Ukrainian Fascist https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDsR5P9Lkw3PZhS5ryJ10gF_Eo7sruc5B ↩︎
  31. Kit Klarenberg: ECHR Finds Ukraine Responsible for Odessa Massacre – https://open.substack.com/pub/kitklarenberg/p/echr-finds-ukraine-responsible-for ↩︎
  32. Video Neutrality Studies “New York Times: USA Running All Operational Decisions in Ukraine, Wants More Ukrainians To Die.”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74TX_8nHhUs ↩︎

#19. US Navy spotted near Nord Stream blasts

Updated: October 11, 2024

Photo: ©ESA – Nordstream pipeline map with shipping traffic

A collection of articles, a playlist and one X post:

08. Videos with discussions about Nordstream
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDsR5P9Lkw3O645C_pRt1PYrt2b2QVEFA

Glenn Greenwald published on October 10, 2024:

07. Russia has proof of US’, UK’s involvement in sabotage of Nord Stream pipelines — diplomat
https://tass.com/politics/1854157
Published: October 9, 2024
In: TASS, Russian News Agency

06. US Navy spotted near Nord Stream blasts – Danish media
American warships were operating in the area with their transponders switched off, Politiken has reported
https://www.rt.com/news/605461-nord-stream-us-navy/
Published: October 9, 2024
In: RT

05. Glenn Greenwald / X / YouTube video about the news
Published: October 8, 2024 | a repost of Thomas Fazi’s post
https://x.com/ggreenwald/status/1843721761889894700

04. Michael Jarlner: Nye ubekvemme spørgsmål rejser sig om Nord Stream-sabotagen
https://politiken.dk/internationalt/art10082817/Nye-ubekvemme-spørgsmål-rejser-sig-om-Nord-Stream-sabotagen
Store medier peger mod Ukraine for sprængninger af to Nord Stream-gasledninger for præcis to år siden. Danmark har stoppet sin efterforskning og jagten på sandheden. Det rejser nye ubekvemme spørgsmål.
Published: 28 September 2024
In: Politiken, Denmark

03. UK insurers refuse to pay Nord Stream because blasts were ‘government’ backed
https://thegrayzone.com/2024/04/17/uk-insurers-refuse-pay-nord-stream/
Published: April 17, 2024
In: The Grayzone
By: Wyatt Reed

02. US behind Nord Stream sabotage – legendary NYT journalist
Washington “took out” the Russian gas pipelines, Seymour Hersh has claimed
https://www.rt.com/news/571173-hersh-us-nord-stream/
Published: 8 February 2023
In: RT

01. How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline
https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream
Published: 8 February 2023
In: Substack
By: Seymour Hersh

00. Joe Biden: “We will bring an end to it.”
Published: 7 February 2022
On: YouTube
By: C-SPAN

Note 1: the Ukraine war did not start in 2022, but in 2014. The war was orchestrated according to the typical USA method: a coup d’état, a pro USA regime change, that, in the Ukraine situation, was made possible by creating the also by US & allies backed Maidan Massacre (this has been scientifically in-depth investigated by Ivan Katchanovski, professor political science in Ottawa, Canada). After the regime change in Kiev the civil war in Ukraine started, between Kiev = USA west, and the Russia oriented east (Donetsk/Donbass). Russia has stepped into the conflict when it became obvious that the western=NATO pushing forward direction Russian border, would not come to an end, neither the killing of many tens of thousands of Russian Ukrainians living in Donetsk. This is evidence based information to be found in this WordPress site, and to be found in YouTube videos in special playlists, which are also to be found in this WP site. The conflicts in Ukraine were provoked by NATO expansion since the nineties. See also the blog post: Ukraine and NATO. The provocations are still continuing.

Note 2: Listen to what not only Biden, but also Trump, Victoria Nuland and Blinken said about Nordstream: Nord Stream “Mystery” SOLVED? published by Glenn Greenwald, on October 10, 2024.

#17. Pay the devil: How the US will force Europe to pay for its military industrial complex

Post updated: October 9, 2024 (scroll down to video)

The outcome of the American election won’t change anything, because the course is already set

Published: October 5, 2024
In: RT
By: Andrey Sushentsov, program director at the Valdai Club.

The American presidential campaign of 2024 has been marked by a series of unprecedented events. These include lawsuits against one candidate and relatives of the sitting president, assassination attempts against Donald Trump and, finally, the unprecedented situation of Joe Biden being forced out of the race by his own party. All of this has made the election marathon an extraordinary event.

Meanwhile, domestic politics in the US is spilling over into the rest of the world, and it’s helping fuel the growing dissatisfaction of the countries representing the world’s majority with the intense attempts by Washington to maintain its leadership. But we should not read too much into the vote, because the policy of seeking to preserve American dominance remains the main strategy of both candidates.

The neoconservative group remains quite prominent in the ruling Democratic Party, whose members’ worldview is built around the idea of power as the only tool for maintaining US leadership. This position doesn’t depend on personal attitudes and beliefs, but is derived from the status they occupy in the political mechanism. The then Senator Biden, for example, once proposed a large number of constructive initiatives in Congress. Among other things, he opposed NATO membership for the Baltic states, to the point where his party colleagues accused him of being too peace-loving in his foreign policy.

Once in the White House, however, Biden strictly followed the usual American logic of global leadership. The defense budget under his administration broke all records of recent decades. The consistency of US foreign policy practice in terms of deterrence strategy towards geopolitical rivals allows us to assert that the structural confrontation with Russia and China will continue regardless of the outcome of the election. The dynamics of this confrontation – in Ukraine and around Taiwan – will be determined by the military budget, a draft of which has already been developed and will be approved before the inauguration of his successor.

Against the backdrop of the election campaign, it is particularly interesting to see how much sharper the rhetoric has become and how it has been filled with catchy, ‘workable’ initiatives. Former Secretary of State Michael Pompeo’s plan for a “forced peace” in Ukraine, which proposes, among other things, that Kiev be brought into NATO on an accelerated basis “so that European allies will bear the burden of its defense,” has been well received. The result of such a scenario would be a direct military conflict between NATO and Russia, so it is unlikely. Such statements, which do not demonstrate a systemic understanding of the situation, need not in principle be long-term in nature. Their function is to mobilize hawks in the establishment, and among the electorate, to show that a forced escalation of the conflict is one possible scenario. It should be noted that as secretary of state, Pompeo established himself as a man prone to making high-profile statements that didn’t culminate in large-scale actions. Nevertheless, his quote is worth considering in the context of the fact that there is no political force in the US that would see the outcome of the Ukraine crisis as an opportunity for reconciliation with Russia.

On the one hand, a continuation will allow Washington to mobilize European NATO members to increase defense spending to a new target of 3% of GDP. In essence, this means more purchases of American weapons by Western Europeans and thus support for the US military-industrial complex. On the other hand, active support for Ukraine allows Russia to be drawn deeper and deeper into an expensive military campaign, thus solving the problem of deterrence without direct confrontation.

The collision of interests between Washington and Kiev is noteworthy here. The Ukrainian government, well aware that its own resources have been exhausted, is feverishly trying to cling to any chance of remaining at the top of the Western coalition’s priorities, and often – as in Kursk – acts rather opportunistically. By offering the West a visible military success, Kiev hoped to force it to become directly involved in the conflict. The Americans see this impulse from Ukraine, but are not interested in such a scenario.

Washington needs Ukraine as a proxy that it can use for as long as possible. The country’s usefulness as an instrument of US foreign policy suggests that the US-Russian crisis will be protracted. At the same time, the upward trajectory of the American defense budget will not change, regardless of the outcome of the election. Thus, Russian foreign policy and military planning is based on maintaining the present military conditions and continuing the strategic rivalry with the US, regardless of who the next American president is.

This article was first published by Valdai Discussion Club, translated and edited by the RT team.

Dr. Sushentsov is a Russian political scientist and foreign relations expert specializing in the American studies. In 2005, he graduated from Moscow State University’s Faculty of History with honors. In 2010, he was a full-time postgraduate student at MGIMO, where he defended a thesis on the topic “US political strategy in international conflicts in the 2000s (evidence from the situation in Afghanistan and Iraq” (2011).

On October 9, 2024, the following video was published by Prof. Pascal Lottaz. The content confirms the content of the article above.

EU Parliament Member EXPOSES Brussel’s Madness | Michael von der Schulenburg
– The EU is quite aware about the dramatic situation in the Ukraine War but still, they are pushing on with ever more talk about continuing the war “as long as it takes”. Michael von der Schulenburg, one of the EU parliament’s new German members, talks with Fritz Edlinger about how Europe has isolated itself and drove its own foreign policy into a corner from which it now has no place to escape.

#15. Documentary: “The Murder of Yugoslavia. The Shadow of Dayton.”

Documentary by Aleksei Denisov, 2015.

In 2015, the Russian news agency VGTRK released a documentary “The Murder of Yugoslavia. The Shadow of Dayton”. With the parallels in today’s Ukrainian conflict and NATO’s role in it, this documentary has become even more current than in 2015. Watch on Rumble.

On the 21st of November 1995 the information agencies of the world sent out an urgent news from the United States of America. On the military base in Dayton, the presidents of Serbia, Croatia, and the leaders of Bosnian Muslims signed an agreement on the cessation of civil war in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
In accordance with it, this part of the former Yugoslavia was now divided into the Muslim Croatian Federation and the Serbian Republic.
…
The Serbs, who controlled almost 75% of Bosnia and Herzegovina, made serious concessions and agreed to keep only 49% of the territory.
This was done to end the civil war, which by that time had actually destroyed the former Yugoslavia.

Source: X

Professor Jeffrey Sachs on Yugoslavia, NATO, Serbia, Kosovo, violation of international law

Economist Jeffrey Sachs revealed that the key reason for NATO aggression against Yugoslavia was to move military infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders, making the claim during an interview with American journalist Tucker Carlson. “We bombed a capital of Europe for 78 days…. We broke apart Serbia, established by our declaration a new country, Kosovo. We put a huge NATO base there, and that was the goal,” said Sachs, describing how the US violated international law and committed atrocities in a sovereign nation.

The entire interview / click:

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑