Category: politiek

#23. Censuur

Bijgewerkt: Mei 2, 2025

Dit artikel is een verzameling van mijn reacties, geplaatst op YouTube, deels daar nog vindbaar, maar deels ook niet, want verwijderd. Echter niet door mij zelf. Omdat ik voorbereid ben op censuur, kopieer ik mijn reacties en bewaar die. Dat deed ik deze keer ook. Ik reageerde op de volgende video. Mijn reacties zijn eronder geplaatst.

Ik wil u vriendelijk verzoeken eerst de video te bekijken, voor zover dat lukt, en dan eerst zelf te oordelen. De titel van de video is door VPRO1 inmiddels gewijzigd. De oorspronkelijke titel kan ik niet precies herinneren, maar “extreem rechts” waren inderdaad gebruikte woorden. “Kijk hoe extreem rechts te werk gaat.” Zoiets.

Mijn eerste reactie

“Ik heb hem, Krah, eens als gast horen spreken in een “The Duran” (Alexander Mercouris/Alex Christoforou) uitzending2 en het zal aan de vragen hebben gelegen en dus de onderwerpen, maar verder ook de afwezige vooringenomenheid om hem te vermorzelen, zoals hierboven gebeurt: ik vond zijn uitspraken bijzonder intelligent. Ik ben geen extremist, ben politiek gezien niet links of rechts, stem niet meer sinds ik ontdekte hoe politiek werkt en er toch werd deelgenomen aan de oorlog in Irak, ben wel voor neutraliteit, maar vooral ook voor dieper doordenken, bewezen feiten, en heb een diepe afkeer van gekleurde aannames, propaganda en onrechtvaardigheid. Ik mag heel graag naar Putin luisteren, inmiddels, sinds ik meer over die vuile oorlog in Oekraïne heb geleerd, via allerlei bijzonder goed politiek/historisch op de hoogte zijnde wetenschappers, intelligentia, academici, zoals bijvoorbeeld Jeffrey D. Sachs, Ivan Katchanovski, Glenn Diesen, Noam Chomsky, ik heb een lange lijst met betrouwbare niet mainstream onderzoeksjournalisten en wetenschappers aangelegd, en gepubliceerd in een speciaal blog3.

Terug naar de video hierboven:

Punt 1: Er is niks mis met de gedachte dat er slechts twee geslachten zijn. Er is heel veel mis betreffende dat wat in het westen als democratisch wordt gecategoriseerd, en dus geaccepteerd als okay, waardoor zelfs kinderen zich laten verminken om dat te worden wat hen wijsgemaakt is door de media, cellphones, als zijnde okay. Je wordt bovendien te pas en te onpas geconfronteerd met allerlei vormen van aan porno gerelateerde beelden. Wat iemand’s seksuele voorkeur is is een privé aangelegenheid. Daar hoef je niet mee te koop te lopen.

Punt 2: Er is niks mis met de gedachte dat niet alle SS-ers oorlogsmisdadigers zouden zijn. Dat dit wel zo zou zijn is een aanname. Over het algemeen deugen ze niet, dat is inderdaad waar. In Kiev worden trouwens jaarlijks Bandera (Oekraïense fascist) tochten gehouden, Het Kiev regime is geïnspireerd door Bandera. Rutte, maar ook de Koning der Nederlanden, beschouwen zich als legitieme supporters van dit regime.

Punt 3: Er is niks mis met de Russen, het zijn mensen, en nee, Nederlanders zijn ook geen goden. Rusland is trouwens een van de laatste landen op deze aarde waar Amerikanen nog geen voet op de grond hebben gezet en alles hebben veramerikaniseerd. Het woord Rusland wordt in Nederland graag in alle mainstream media gebruikt om iemand mee te stigmatiseren, in een hokje te plaatsen, te categoriseren als “deugt niet”, “is fout”. Dat is discriminatie. Dit gebeurt in de docu hierboven ook. Dit gebeurde ook in zuid-oost Oekraïne. Vanuit Amerikaans Kiev.

Punt 4: Putin deugt4. Dat kun je als je echt oren hebt om te horen, ook horen. Maar dan moet je niet vooringenomen zijn, echter wel open minded, en iemand de kans geven te laten zeggen wat die te zeggen heeft. Er zijn echter haat campagnes tegen hem, en vreemd genoeg gebeurt dit niet met Rutte.
NAVO deugt niet5. Dit is onderzocht, met neutrale blik en mind, ook door mij. Ook Rutte deugt niet. Gedurende de tijd dat hij regeerde heeft hij Nederland aan de rand van de afgrond gebracht. Hij was gekozen. Ja. Door wie? Een docu maken over Rutte gebeurt niet. Waarom niet? Om de schijn op te houden dat Nederland deugt. Advies voor een eventuele docu over Rutte: laat alleen hen aan het woord die weten hoe hij de praktijk van hun dagelijkse leven heeft gecreëerd6 en alles kwijt zijn geraakt en nog steeds niets terug hebben gekregen.

Punt 5: Trump deugt niet. Dat wist/weet iedereen die kon/kan zien en horen. Biden deugt ook niet. Welke Amerikaanse presidenten hebben gedeugd? Trump wordt nu, terecht overigens, gecategoriseerd als “deugt niet”, en dus snap ik niet waarom Krah pro Trump is, of zou zijn. Maar waarom is VPRO plotseling anti Trump? Omdat Europa en dus ook Nederland de ernstige financiële gevolgen voelt van het Trump beleid? Tuurlijk. Biden is schuldig aan volkerenmoord en we zijn ternauwernood aan een door hem dreigende kernoorlog ontsnapt maar ik heb geen docu over hem gezien. Inmiddels gaat Rutte door met handje schudden met hen die een genocide aan het realiseren zijn, en die zijn mond vol heeft over Russen die niet zouden deugen, want tja, als je NAVO secretaris bent moet je een extreem dure wapenwedloop legitimeren en dat doe je door een vijand in het leven te roepen, ook al is er die niet wezenlijk. Dat mag allemaal.

Deze reactie is geschreven toen ik de video stopte na twee en een halve minuut kijken. De teneur in de video was gezet.”

De tweede reactie

Omdat ik eens wilde kijken of mijn reactie toch was blijven staan, ontdekte ik dat die weg was. Ik reageerde met mijn Multerland YT channel7 en schreef het volgende: “Geteld: 56 comments. Geplaatst volgens YouTube: 450 comments. Verwijderd door VPRO: 394 comments. Waaronder het mijne. Niet geplaatst als Multerland, maar als Antoinette Janssen. Profielen kunnen worden verborgen (hide user from channel), vandaar dat ik via een ander kanaal reageer hier. Benieuwd of het blijft staan. Zal wel. Onschuld moet goed gespeeld worden.”

De derde reactie

Ik reageerde als Antoinette Janssen… “Inderdaad. Dat is dit profiel. Krah bashen8 mag kennelijk, maar verder moet je met scherpe woorden / terechte kritiek betreffende de ster van Nederland, nu secretaris, voorheen premier, afblijven.”

De vierde reactie

Deze kwam van een andere YouTube gebruiker… “Leuk is dat hè. Welkom bij Nederland. Censuur op YouTube hoort er gewoon bij kennelijk. Als er één goede alternatief is voor YouTube dan wil ik het horen want dan is YouTube voorbij wat mij betreft.”

De vijfde reactie

Deze is weer van mijzelf, als Antoinette Janssen… “Hoe YouTube werkt weet ik, en dus ook hoe sommige YouTube profielen via het meld systeem van zogenaamd foute comments deze zelfs kunnen laten verdwijnen (zie de drie vertikale puntjes rechts naast ieder comment), terwijl die profielen zelf geen enkele video geüpload hebben, geen playlist hebben aangelegd, geen informatie vermelden over wie zij zijn, dus alleen maar aanwezig zijn voor het anoniem doen verdwijnen van kritische doch op gedegen onderzoek en zelfs wetenschap gebaseerde reacties, die dus anders zijn dan de publieke omroepen verkondigen. Zoals bijvoorbeeld het profiel “pelsluisje9” –dat overal in Nederlandse videos over politiek zwaar aanwezig is, zijn werk doet en dus ondermijnend werkt in wat een democratisch systeem zou moeten zijn–. Dit heb ik meerdere keren ervaren.

Echter. VPRO was voor mij altijd HET kritische alternatief van alles wat mainstream was. Ik was een fan. Dit begon met “Vrije Geluiden10“, de TV gids. VPRO heeft zich helaas bij de meute gevoegd, dat is duidelijk. Daarom: dat bashen in een video MAG terwijl dit, hoewel terecht, het met de grond gelijk maken van een persoon die Nederland tot aan de bodem heeft afgebroken, NIET mag in reacties, is onacceptabel, want hypocriet.

Je kunt bovendien niet alles in de schoenen van YouTube schuiven. Ook uploaders hebben macht, en dus ook VPRO. Zij kunnen profielen verbannen, door de optie “hide user from channel”. Heb je een comment geplaatst dat een uploader niet bevalt, en dat je dus verborgen wordt, ofwel verbannen, is niet zichtbaar voor degene die dit comment geplaatst heeft, tenzij uitgelogd: dan is het weg. Log je in, dan is het er weer. Niemand kan het dus vinden, alleen degene die dit comment geplaatst heeft. Een slim systeem, dat gelukkig bestaat om werkelijk foute profielen van je comments weg te houden, maar ik ben geen fout profiel wanneer ik onderzoeksgebaseerde, dus waarheidsgetrouwe, weliswaar scherpe, maar terecht scherpe, reacties plaats.

Ik heb geleerd mijn comments te kopiëren voor ik die plaats. Ik heb mijn originele comment dus nog en ga dit posten in mijn eigen YT kanaal11.”

De zesde reactie

Nadat ook de vorige reactie, nummer 5, was verwijderd, heb ik tot slot toegevoegd, als Antoinette Janssen: “Een reactie van mij hierop (op de reactie van een andere YouTube gebruiker) is ook verdwenen. Ik heb die ook gekopieerd, en is nu net als de originele eerste terug te vinden in mijn posts.”

Aanvullend

01. De TV serie: “Morten”

Toevalligerwijs was ik net begonnen met het kijken van….

De TV SERIE MORTEN (2019)12 – Deze is gebaseerd op de boeken van Dominique van der Heyde en Annet de Jong, gaat over de Nederlandse politiek, een bepaalde partij, en een politicus die premier wil worden en wordt, en vertoont opvallend veel overeenkomsten met de realiteit, met de echte premier, destijds, zelfs qua gestalte, gezicht, kapsel, manier van denken, het carrière maken, de jacht naar hoger, meer. Zelfs het doen voorkomen dat allochtonen13 hartelijk welkom zijn. De propaganda14 die daaromheen gebouwd is heeft raakvlakken met een (ook VPRO) serie, gemaakt in 2025: De Kinderen van Rutte15, waarin hij les geeft aan allochtonen. Dit betekent dat de serie Morten nog steeds actueel is.

Uiteraard is alles fictie, of (schijnbaar?) bedoeld als fictie, maar dus duidelijk geïnspireerd door de realiteit, of voorzien, voorvoeld, soms zelfs gekopieerd, met vele details die wel en niet als zodanig bekend zijn. Het is dus een mix van fictie en realiteit, met uitzondering van het slot, want nooit gebeurd en zal nooit zo gebeuren, maar alles wat in de hele serie getoond wordt had wel echt gebeurd kunnen zijn. Over de figuur Morten is in de serie in de media niets te vinden. Net als de echte premier van 2010-202416 houdt hij van privacy.

Een meesterlijk geacteerde serie. Meesterlijk opgenomen. Meesterlijk geschreven. Kijken en checken, dus.

02. Video 16-04-2025: The Duran, Alexander Mercouris / Alex Christoforou, Germany’s Merz, debt brake gone and removing AfD17

Start video op 11: 52 – Alex Christoforou: “What does this mean for Europe, Merz, for the EU?” Alexander Mercouris: “For the EU, yes, deepening crisis, especially as the economic situation across Europe darkens. But I’m going to say, I think it’s also going to lead to more and more demands from the EU center, that it be granted more and more power, so, even as the whole thing starts to crack, you will see more pressure to push for ever greater centralization and ever greater power to be given by the states to Brussels, and Merz himself apparently can’t stand Ursula von der Leyen, they are old standing enemies, and Merz apparently thinks that he should be in charge of the EU rather than Ursula should, but ultimately I think that’s where he’s going to go.

I suspect Merz himself will not be chancellor of Germany for very long, but the EU structures, the central structures in Brussels, will remain, and as I said: we will see more demands the power drift towards them and what you can also see is that in states like Germany and other places where you could argue there would be arguments that there might be domestic, constitutional or legal restraints preventing crackdowns on groups like the AfD. How do you get round that? You get some kind of regulation passed in Brussels. The European Court of Justice then says that EU law takes precedence over national or constitutional law, so you get yourself the legal mechanisms to ban parties like the AfD passed in Brussels by the European Parliament, and the European Commission. That way overriding any cons any restraints that might exist in Germany itself because of the constitutional systems there.”

03. Jeffrey D. Sachs: Giving Birth to the New International Order18

The multipolar world will be born when the geopolitical weight of Asia, Africa, and Latin America matches their rising economic weight.

04. Video: Glenn Diesen / Lord Robert Skidelsky19:

Europe Is Trapped by Its Own Propaganda in Ukraine

05. Video: Glenn Diesen / Jurij Kofner: Germany Designates Its Main Opposition Party as an “Extremist Organisation”20

Jurij Kofner is an economist and an economic advisor to AfD. After AfD polled as the largest political party in Germany, the German authorities designated it a “right-wing extremist organisation”, which could be the first step to banning the opposition.

Voetnoten:

  1. VPRO: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/VPRO ↩︎
  2. Video: Alexander Mercouris, Glenn Diesen, Maximilian Krah – Germany economic decline & alternative futures. Gepubliceerd: 10 november 2023. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAaXKxJfXFo ↩︎
  3. Dit blog, Sustainable Politics ↩︎
  4. Putin deugt. Dit is een conclusie gemaakt na het beluisteren van videos, bekijken van videos, bestuderen van academische teksten over de speciale operatie in Oekraïne, de coup in 2014, het Maidan Bloedbad, interviews, speeches, en de kennis van wetenschappers, historici, betreffende Rusland, Putin, NAVO, EU, USA. Dat is een intensieve dagelijkse bezigheid sinds 2022. Mijn eigen conclusies sloten en sluiten aan bij diegenen die in dit blog verzameld zijn als bewezen betrouwbaar, omdat op geen enkel ogenblik een of andere uitspraak indruiste tegen dat wat ik zelf al had gecategoriseerd als zijnde okay, of waar ik zelf achter stond: ik ben dus niet gehersenspoeld, ik ben een autonoom denker. Als geboren westerling heb ik gedurende mijn hele bewuste leven al –ik ben van 1948– vraagtekens geplaatst achter de uitdrukking: “westerse beschaving” omdat datgene wat ik zelf als deugdzaam hoog in mijn eigen vaandel heb staan, niet weerspiegeld zag en zie in de westerse wereld waarin ik leef. Ik houd van cultuur, dans, muziek, kunst, en wetenschap, van ethiek en rechtvaardigheid, waarheid. Fatsoen. Ik hoor westerse leiders en ik vergelijk sinds 2022 wat zij verkondigen en hoe zij zich gedragen met wat ik hoor uit de mond van Vladimir Putin en hoe hij zich gedraagt. Bij Putin hoor ik diepgang, kennis, feiten, antwoorden op vragen, helderheid in denken en spreken, uitdrukken, logica, intelligentie, ernst, waarachtige liefde voor Rusland, en zie dit ook in zijn gedrag. Putin deugt. Hij bewijst het zelf. Ik ben ervan overtuigd dat zonder hem de U-turn van de uni-polar world (US hegemon) naar een multi-polar world niet gemaakt kan worden. Het westen is een lastige, puberachtige tegenpool, niet omdat het blind is, maar omdat het niets ziet. Begrijpt niet wat vrede is en hoe dit te bereiken. Snapt de psychologie van zichzelf niet. Doorziet zichzelf niet en snapt daardoor Rusland ook niet. Het vraagt bedachtzaamheid, juiste inschatting, en gedisciplineerd geduld om op de juiste wijze op het juiste moment te reageren op de enorme provocaties vanuit het westen, dat deze provocaties systematisch verzwijgt voor het eigen volk. Ik kijk echter sinds 2022 naar info die de mainstream media niet laten zien of horen. Ik begon met Noam Chomsky. De lijst is inmiddels stabiel, lang, maar gecontroleerd en bijgewerkt. Verder heb ik voldoende levenservaring en -kennis vergaard om te weten wie wel of niet deugen. Ik ben vaak hard op mijn bek gegaan, zwaar onderuit gegaan omdat ik woorden geloofde, terwijl ik wist, diep binnenin, dat het gelogen woorden waren. Ik ben dus een ervaringsdeskundige. Ik heb een ingebouwde leugendetector opgebouwd. ↩︎
  5. Deugen, deugdzaamheid: tegengesteld aan niet deugen, want niet sustainable, niet houdbaar, de toekomst van alle leven op aarde ondermijnend, door, in dit geval, het volk te misleiden, op te zwepen, vijanden te creëren om wapenwedloop te legitimeren, oorlogen uit te dagen, met absoluut onware teksten (zogenaamde bias) en verzwegen en/of genegeerde waarachtig gebeurde feiten die allemaal terug te vinden zijn op de timeline van de wereld geschiedenis. In dit blog heb ik bewust gekozen voor “virtuous”, deugdzaamheid, deugen, en een lijst gemaakt van hen die de waarheid dienen en uitspreken, glashelder analyseren. “De waarheid” is dat wat je ziet wanneer je op de top van de allerhoogste berg de wereld rondom je heen ziet en daar beneden het hele labyrinth van oorzaken en gevolgen kunt waarnemen, in een cirkel van 360 graden, en zonder een detail te kunnen missen of over het hoofd te zien. Alleen de super-intellectuelen, academici, zieners, hebben de absolute top van die metaforische berg beklommen. Virtuous: https://backups.blog/gallery/ ↩︎
  6. De toeslagenaffaire, de slachtoffers van de Groningse aardbevingen, de groeiende armoede met name in de grote steden. ↩︎
  7. Multerland, YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@Multerland ↩︎
  8. Bashen: Met bashing is het de bedoeling de mening of het argument van iemand anders te bekritiseren. Dit gebeurt niet op een subtiele wijze maar doelbewust op een negatief geladen en vaak ook beledigende manier. ↩︎
  9. Pelsluisje, YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@Pelsluisje ↩︎
  10. VPRO gids, voorheen Vrije Geluiden: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/VPRO_Gids ↩︎
  11. Antoinette Janssen, YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@AntoinetteJanssen ↩︎
  12. Uitzending Gemist – Morten (2019): https://npo.nl/start/serie/morten/seizoen-1/morten ↩︎
  13. Allochtoon, betekenis: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allochtoon_(persoon) ↩︎
  14. Propaganda, betekenis: https://www.mediawijs.be/nl/propaganda ↩︎
  15. Uitzending Gemist, VPRO, De kinderen van Rutte (2025): https://npo.nl/start/serie/kinderen-van-rutte/seizoen-1/de-kinderen-van-rutte ↩︎
  16. Mark Rutte: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Rutte ↩︎
  17. AfD: Alternative für Deutschland: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_für_Deutschland Video The Duran: Germany’s Merz, debt brake gone and removing AfD: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s969BlRdSW8 ↩︎
  18. OTHER NEWS, Voices Against The Tide: Jeffrey D. Sachs – Giving Birth To The New International Order: https://www.other-news.info/giving-birth-to-the-new-international-order/ ↩︎
  19. Video URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtDydebAs8k ↩︎
  20. Video URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nf0zkOCm4Pc ↩︎

#22. Koblenko

[Laatste update: Mei 1, 2025]

Ik hoor er niet meer bij…

Maar ik hoorde er wel bij. Ik ging ook regelmatig in, en met de stroom mee, dat voelt lekker, samen, heerlijk, we zijn het eens, ja, inderdaad, Poetin deugt niet, moet je kijken, dat jacht dat besteld was in Italië. Bijvoorbeeld. Maar tegelijkertijd was er ook altijd iets wat niet alleen ik zag, wanneer, zoals in mijn geval, kijkend naar die ene documentaire over hem die, hoe merkwaardig is dat, nu niet meer terug te vinden is bij NPO Uitzending Gemist, in die enorme waslijst die aangereikt wordt daar wanneer je de zoekterm “Poetin” gebruikt, of zie ik die over het hoofd1? Hoe dan ook: ik werd me bewust, onderwijl kijkend, observerend, invoelend, luisterend: hij deugt.
Ik kon daarom niet begrijpen waarom hij Oekraïne binnenviel.
Nu, 2025, drie jaren verder en enorm veel historisch wetenschappelijk onderzoeksmateriaal, achtergrondinformatie en details rijker, begrijp ik waarom hij Oekraïne binnenviel.
En…, iedereen die de feiten kent, zou hetzelfde gedaan hebben.

Daarom: ik hoor er niet meer bij.
Ik schrijf dit nadat ik weer geconfronteerd werd met personen of een persoon, waar ik niet meer bij wil horen, maar die ik ondanks mijn pogingen hen te mijden, toch “tegen het lijf loop” in dit geval, via het scherm van mijn computer omdat ik als een in Noorwegen wonende Nederlandse graag af en toe naar niet-politieke, Nederlandse, ontspannende uitzendingen kijk, zoals Bed&Breakfast, Boer Zoekt Vrouw of RailAway. De overdosis aan negativiteit in de politieke wereld van vandaag moet worden gecompenseerd, nu en dan.

Maar….

Wat je ook opent, welke omroepzender dan ook, met de eigen talk show, de reclame spotjes —zelfs dat: adverteren door een omroep voor bijvoorbeeld “De kinderen van Rutte”2, een TV serie over Rutte die lesgeeft, die het volk moet overtuigen dat Rutte een waar-achtig mens zou zijn met een hart—je wordt ongevraagd en ongewild met propaganda geconfronteerd, en dus heb ik een trailer van die serie gezien. De Rutte propaganda wordt gewoon pal vóór een populair programma ingelast, zonder enige aankondiging, hoe slim, en het naïve volk, zich verkneukelend op wat er gaat komen, wordt ermee ingewreven, zapt niet, want men wil het komende programma niet missen, geen seconde ervan. Je kunt geen beter psychologisch perfect gekozen moment bedenken. Dus gebeurde dat ook.

“Bar Laat”, over Loretta Schrijver, met Jeroen Pauw en hé, Koblenko zit ook aan tafel.

Wanneer je uiteindelijk, nu, 2025 —na een leven lang geleefd te hebben (geboren in 1948), en mezelf verdiept te hebben in wat het westen is, terwijl ik leef in dat westen, en dus een constante waarnemer ben, een ervaringsdeskundige, een kritisch geworden ervaringsdeskundige— dan toch een keer meekijkt met het anders gemeden “Bar Laat”, vanwege het overlijden van Loretta Schrijver, en verwachtende dat Jeroen Pauw aanwezig zou zijn als gast, en ja, die was aanwezig, want samengewerkt met Loretta en jarenlang haar geliefde geweest, dan zit daar ook Victoria Koblenko aan tafel als, jawel, politicoloog.3 Ik heb na de intro van “Bar Laat”, met Jeroen Pauw, niet verder gekeken, want geen zin in Koblenko of enige andere gast.

Koblenko: politicoloog?

Koblenko heeft inderdaad politicologie gestudeerd in Leiden—las ik in Wikipedia4, bij gebrek aan een website van haar die adequate informatie biedt, want “under construction”—en behaalde het bachelor niveau. Maar ben je met alleen een bachelor diploma ook inderdaad een politicoloog?

Dat Koblenko absoluut niet op de hoogte is van de historische en politieke feiten in Oekraïne, terwijl ze gevraagd wordt om haar zegje te doen als zelf-benoemd “expert” in allerlei talk-shows en via lezingen, getuigen haar eigen woorden, waarin duidelijk wordt aan welke kant zij staat5. Ze heeft zelfs een interview6 gemaakt met wat men noemt “de first lady van Oekraïne”, terwijl die helemaal geen first lady meer is, omdat de termijn van de man in het groene T-shirt officieel verstreken is, en omdat we inmiddels weten wie die man in dat groene T-shirt werkelijk is… , en daarom zou Koblenko geen interview met die “lady” hebben moeten willen afnemen. Voor de vele feiten over Zelensky verwijs ik graag naar de echte Oekraïne deskundigen, die te vinden zijn in dit blog.

Hoe die oorlog is begonnen, waarom, wat er in het zuidoosten van Oekraïne aan oorlogsgeweld plaatsvond vanuit en door Kiev zelf, met raketaanvallen, terreur, volkerenmoord en meer, omdat er Russen wonen die zich, terecht overigens en vooral begrijpelijk want gediscrimineerd door Kiev, niet wilden conformeren met de pro USA regering die na de door USA georkestreerde coup in 2014 zitting nam in Kiev, en wat allemaal terug te vinden is in door onderzoeksjournalisten gemaakte opnames aldaar: ze weet het niet, hoeft kennelijk niets te lezen, want “door geboorte deskundig” omdat ze geboren is in Oekraïne, in 1980, in Vinnytsja7. Dat is 45 jaren geleden. Ze verhuisde mee met haar ouders (waarom verhuisden die?) naar Nederland in 1992, dat is 32 jaren geleden. De omstandigheden in de relatie tussen Oekraïne en Rusland waren toen bovendien totaal anders dan die nu zijn.
Welke informatiebronnen zij gebruikt is niet te achterhalen omdat haar website8 nog in opbouw is. Hoelang al? Wanneer mensen haar vragen naar informatie over Oekraïne is zij verplicht aan te kunnen tonen waar zij die vandaan haalt, zodat men weet of datgene wat zij gaat vertellen pro-Oekraïne is of tegen-Oekraïne want zij volgt daadwerkelijk de mensen die Oekraïne afbreken, en schuldig zijn aan de moord op Oekraïners door hen de oorlog in te sturen. Alle details en feiten zijn o.a. in dit blog te vinden.

Er is vooral in Oekraïne een enorm gebrek aan betrouwbare bronnen, en dat wordt aangetoond door het feit dat de oppositiepartij-leider Oleksandr Dubinsky ….. in een Oekraïense gevangenis zit en geen contact mag onderhouden met de buitenwereld. Professor Glenn Diesen9, heeft desondanks een interview10 met hem weten te regelen.

Koblenko wil ooit terug. Naar wat? En als wie?

De doden die zijn gevallen waren nog in leven geweest wanneer Koblenko en politieke soortgenoten begonnen waren met het bestuderen van de feiten die de mainstream media niet melden, want verplicht om westerse propaganda te kopiëren, te plakken en te publiceren, waardoor het eenvoudig blijft om de rode draad in een talk show te houden, en alles als “wij gelijkgezinden onder elkaar” naar buiten toe uit te stralen, met hier en daar wellicht—want zo ging het altijd—een andere stem, die dan toch weer overstemd werd door een andere gast gekozen door de propaganda machine achter de schermen.

Het Oekraïne zoals dit door de mainstream media getoond wordt bestaat niet. De realiteit is anders, maar dan moet je willen en durven kijken. Koblenko kijkt niet. Het Oekraïne dat zij verliet bestaat niet meer. Het is mogelijk dat er een heel andere wind gaat waaien in Oekraïne, wanneer Oleksandr Dubinsky (zie voetnoot 7) president zou worden. Er zijn nog geen verkiezingen geweest. Zelensky wil aanblijven. Doorvechten. Nog meer Oekraïners moeten worden afgeslacht.

Het Nederlandse schatkist-geld is op

De talk show “Bar Laat” begon, net zoals alle omroepen dat doen momenteel, met het laten zien van deze advertentie: Laat de Publieke Omroep Niet Wegbezuinigen11.

Ook die advertentie had er helemaal niet hoeven te zijn, wanneer Nederland zichzelf niet arm gemaakt had aan de oorlog in Oekraïne, door ook Nederland zelf geprovoceerd, want lid van NAVO, en dan had al dat geld in de staatskas kunnen blijven, de Groningers eindelijk hun huizen gekregen die beloofd zijn door nu-NAVO secretaris, dan hadden de slachtoffers van de belastingaffaire allemaal gekregen wat hun beloofd was, want hun recht, dan was er geen energiecrisis geweest, geen inflatie, dan waren er geen bezuinigingen nodig geweest op onderwijs, gezondheidszorg, en nu dus de omroepen, en dan had Koblenko gewoon nu al terug kunnen keren naar een Oekraïne dat, zoals voor de coup in 2014, nauw samenwerkte, in vrede, met Rusland.

Update, Maart 31, 2025 / Dat de Nederlandse schatkist leger en leger wordt (hoe bijzonder, dat woord “leger” in deze context) komt onder meer ook door wat in de nieuwsbrief12 van Investigate Europe staat geschreven over ook het Nederlandse “leger”: “Europese leiders beloven de defensie-uitgaven te verhogen. Er worden miljarden euro’s vrijgemaakt om nationale legers te versterken en gezamenlijke militaire initiatieven uit te breiden.”

Koblenko is met haar Ruslandhaat-campagne een voor een oorlogszuchtig EU belangrijk psychologisch wapen om een sterk vijandbeeld te creëren, dat nodig is om de goedkeuring van het [ten onrechte] russofoob13 gemaakte volk af te dwingen voor de noodzaak van onverantwoorde want volstrekt onnodige financiële uitgaven van een groter leger en meer wapens, dat alleen het imago van Brussel dient, want de schaamte voor de overigens lang geleden al voorspelde nederlaag in die door NAVO/USA/EU uitgedaagde oorlog moet verstopt worden. Dat vijandbeeld is precies wat Koblenko aan het volk “verkoopt” in talk shows, lezingen en ook “Libelle”, één van de allereerste -opgericht in 1934- en meest gelezen damesbladen in Nederland en Vlaams België14, waarin o.a. haar interview met “de first lady van Oekraïne” verscheen1516. Professor Glenn Diesen schreef een boek over russofobie17.

Katchanovski

Jij, Koblenko, verdient geld met westerse propaganda, en ondermijnt daarmee elke vorm van toekomst voor Oekraïne.
Neem eens serieus de tijd voor een echte studie, en begin met Dr. Ivan Katchanovski18. Ook een Oekraïner, een politieke wetenschapper, moedig, want de feiten tot op de bodem onderzoekend, en ermee naar buiten komend ook19, tegen de stroom van de verraders en huichelaars in, de gehersenspoelden, ondanks de gevaren ervan, omdat tegen de stroom in denken en handelen gevaarlijk is, zoals Gonzalo Lira20 heeft moeten ervaren.
Er zijn diverse westerse onafhankelijke onderzoeksjournalisten die het leven zuur gemaakt is, en wordt.
Er zijn zelfs westerse dissidenten die het westen ontvlucht zijn. Waaronder bijvoorbeeld Oekraïne onderzoeker Eva Karene Bartlett21 (documentaires Donbass22), en Ben Norton23 (China)

Wanneer klaar met het bestuderen van de onderzoeken van Dr. Ivan Katchanovski: ga verder met Dr. Jeffrey D. Sachs24, Dr. Glenn Diesen25, etc.26.

Zeer selectief zijn, leren wat betrouwbaar is en waarom

Zomaar iets kiezen uit de door YouTube aangereikte lijst na het gebruik van zoektermen levert info op die onbetrouwbaar kan zijn, misleidend, of zelfs gelogen en dus af te raden.
Gedurende de afgelopen jaren heb ik deze lijst27 samengesteld met namen, die te checken zijn, via websites, en die 100% betrouwbaar zijn gebleken. Er zijn inmiddels ook personen door mij weer van die lijst verwijderd, wanneer bleek dat die onwaarheden verkondigden, waarvan ik zeker wist dat het onwaarheden waren, of aannames, want niet bewezen. Ook personen die te kennen gaven in videos bijvoorbeeld pro-Trump te zijn, omdat het een held zou zijn, die een aanslag overleefde, zijn verwijderd.
Ik streef naar neutraliteit, naar verifieerbare waarheden. De geschiedenis liegt niet, maar het westen verzwijgt wel heel bewust en zorgvuldig delen van de geschiedenis, of negeert die, gemakshalve. Er is volop materiaal verzameld om mee aan de slag te gaan. Dit geldt voor iedereen die wakker wil worden. Ik voer geen Russische propaganda, ik publiceer logica, feiten, en indien die feiten door Russen worden verteld, want gecontroleerd waar, dan zou ik de waarheid onrecht aandoen door die feiten links te laten liggen. Datzelfde geldt voor iedere wereldburger. Ook voor jou, Koblenko.

Politicoloog?

Tot je werkelijk op de hoogte bent, Koblenko: verwijder de titel politicoloog.
Je bent het niet voordat de titel “Dr.” voor je naam staat, maar zelfs dan ben je nog niet per se Oekraïne-Rusland deskundige. Daar komt veel en veel meer bij kijken.
Je toont aan dat je gewoon simpelweg en rechtuit gezegd: onwetend bent, zelfs bewust onwetend omdat er overal correcte neutrale informatie te vinden is, en omdat je jezelf politicoloog noemt ben je mijns inziens verplicht het volk voor te lichten met feiten, niet met wat “cherry-picking” feitjes, of wat 1-dags impressies, wat gevoelens betreffende Kiev en de voornaam van je zoon, een interview met een Oekraïne-onwaardige persoon die samen met wie zij haar man noemt in Canada applaudisseerde voor een Duitse nazi veteraan28, haar “man” volgt terwijl ze weet dat die vuile oorlog door toedoen van haar man realiteit werd door te luisteren naar Boris Johnson29, doch gestopt had kunnen worden, en weet van de jaarlijkse pro Bandera30 tochten in Kiev (of weet je dat niet Koblenko?), nee, de volle waarheid, tot in alle complexe details en sub details.

Laatste nieuws, ook voor jou, Koblenko

01. Kit Klarenberg: ECHR Finds Ukraine Responsible for Odessa Massacre31
Gepubliceerd: Maart 30, 2025
Op: Substack

02. Update: April 1, 2025: Een propaganda artikel in de New York Times, geanalyseerd door professor Pascal Lottaz, Neutrality Studies. “New York Times: De VS neemt alle operationele beslissingen in Oekraïne en wil dat er meer Oekraïners sterven.” / “New York Times: USA Running All Operational Decisions in Ukraine, Wants More Ukrainians To Die.32”

03. Update: April 10, 2025: Een video, gepubliceerd door Judge Andrew Napolitano: Prof. Glenn Diesen : Ukraine, Tariffs, and Europe.

04. Update: Mei 1, 2025: Een video, gepubliceerd door Prof. Glenn Diesen – Patrik Baab: German War Propaganda in the Ukraine War – en een andere video met Patrik Baab, gepubliceerd door Prof. Pascal Lottaz, Neutrality Studies, medio April: German War Journalist REVEALS Realities in Ukraine | Patrik Baab

Verklaring

Natuurlijk zou ik beschouwd kunnen worden als iemand die ook kopieert en plakt, als een papegaai fungeert, betreffende het intellectuele gedachtegoed van alle genoemde wetenschappers. Echter. Mijn eigen goed ontwikkelde autonome denken vond herkenning in wat die wetenschappers vertelden, heb het ervaren als het grootste intellectuele goed dat een mens kan ontvangen. Eindelijk kwamen er echte denkers op mijn pad, betreffende de wereldpolitiek en wereldgeschiedenis. Alle puzzelstukjes vielen op hun plek met hetgeen zij aanreikten.

Voetnoten:

  1. NPO, Uitzending Gemist, zoekterm Poetin https://npo.nl/start/zoeken?zoekTerm=Poetin ↩︎
  2. NPO, Uitzending Gemist, Serie: De kinderen van Rutte https://npo.nl/start/serie/kinderen-van-rutte/seizoen-1/de-kinderen-van-rutte/afspelen ↩︎
  3. NPO, Uitzending Gemist, Bar Laat, Uitzending donderdag 27 maart 2025, aflevering 49 – https://npo.nl/start/serie/bar-laat/seizoen-2/bar-laat_114/afspelen ↩︎
  4. Wikipedia, Victoria Koblenko, studie: “Tijdens haar vaste rol in GTST studeerde ze tussen 1999 en 2008 Politicologie en Ruslandkunde aan de Universiteit Leiden. Ruslandkunde maakte ze niet af. In 2008 behaalde ze een bachelordiploma voor de studie Politicologie.”  https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Koblenko#Vroegere_levensloop ↩︎
  5. RTL: Victoria Koblenko staat stil bij drie jaar ‘onmenselijke wreedheid’ in moederland https://www.rtl.nl/boulevard/entertainment/artikel/5496090/victoria-koblenko-staat-stil-bij-3-jaar-oorlog-oekraine ↩︎
  6. RTL: Victoria Koblenko voor het eerst terug in Oekraïne sinds invasie: ‘Een reis die me diep raakte’ https://www.rtl.nl/boulevard/entertainment/artikel/5484451/victoria-koblenko-oekraine-terug-sinds-oorlog ↩︎
  7. Vinnytsja [De Oekraïense luchtmacht heeft sinds 1992 haar hoofdkwartier in Vinnytsja] https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinnytsja ↩︎
  8. Website Victoria Koblenko: Coming Soon https://victoriakoblenko.nl ↩︎
  9. Glenn Diesen is a professor of Russian international affairs, with focus on geo-economics, conservatism and the Greater Eurasia Initiative. Substack: https://glenndiesen.substack.com ↩︎
  10. Oleksandr Dubinsky, interview published March 28, 2025, in Glenn Diesen’s YT channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7K8OSIant8 ↩︎
  11. Laat de Publieke Omroep Niet Wegbezuinigen https://nieuwgeneco.nl/steun-actie-medewerkers-publieke-omroep/ ↩︎
  12. Nieuwsbrief Maart 31, 2025, Investigate Europe https://0rr1w.mjt.lu/nl3/t61DrnmdVe7L0s1RoqUcLA ↩︎
  13. Nederlands woordenboek, russofoob https://www.woorden.org/woord/russofoob ↩︎
  14. Libelle, tijdschrift, opgericht in 1934 https://wikikids.nl/Libelle_(tijdschrift) ↩︎
  15. Libelle, interview Koblenko https://www.libelle.nl/cs-b8a76b7a/ ↩︎
  16. Libelle, overzicht bijdragen Koblenko https://www.libelle.nl/tag/victoria-koblenko ↩︎
  17. Professor Glenn Diesen – Russophobia: Propaganda in International Politics https://www.amazon.com/Russophobia-Propaganda-International-Glenn-Diesen/dp/9811914672/ Boekoverzicht Glenn Diesen: https://backups.blog/books/ ↩︎
  18. List, Ivan Katchanovski https://backups.blog/political-analysts-experts/ ↩︎
  19. ResearchGate: Ivan Katchanovski https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ivan-Katchanovski ↩︎
  20. The Grayzone: American citizen Gonzalo Lira dies from neglect in Ukrainian prison https://thegrayzone.com/2024/01/12/gonzalo-lira-dies-ukrainian-prison/ ↩︎
  21. Backups.blog: Eva Karene Bartlett, Award Winning Independent Journalist https://backups.blog/2024/04/04/10-eva-karene-bartlett/ ↩︎
  22. Donbass, Ukraine – Eva Karene Bartlett https://ingaza.wordpress.com/the-donbass-my-articles-videos-interviews-from-on-the-donetsk-lugansk-peoples-republics-2019-present/ ↩︎
  23. Ben Norton, YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@GeopoliticalEconomyReport ↩︎
  24. Jeffrey D. Sachs, website https://www.jeffsachs.org, Videos: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDsR5P9Lkw3PeHMjPW-xF2cn-wu8ZBo7M ↩︎
  25. Glenn Diesen: Substack https://glenndiesen.substack.com, Books: https://backups.blog/books/ ↩︎
  26. Political Analysts https://backups.blog/political-analysts-experts/ ↩︎
  27. Political Analysts https://backups.blog/political-analysts-experts/ ↩︎
  28. NBC News https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/canada-speaker-apologizes-ukraine-nazi-veteran-honored-rcna117125 ↩︎
  29. The Grayzone, Boris Johnson admits Ukraine broke peace deal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDmGs1BM8gM ↩︎
  30. Bandera, Ukrainian Fascist https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDsR5P9Lkw3PZhS5ryJ10gF_Eo7sruc5B ↩︎
  31. Kit Klarenberg: ECHR Finds Ukraine Responsible for Odessa Massacre – https://open.substack.com/pub/kitklarenberg/p/echr-finds-ukraine-responsible-for ↩︎
  32. Video Neutrality Studies “New York Times: USA Running All Operational Decisions in Ukraine, Wants More Ukrainians To Die.”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74TX_8nHhUs ↩︎

#21. Stepan Bandera’s Sinister MI6 Alliance Exposed

Stepan Bandera’s Sinister MI6 Alliance Exposed (part 1)
https://www.kitklarenberg.com/p/stepan-banderas-sinister-mi6-alliance
Published: March 23, 2025
In: Substack
By: Kit Klarenberg

Excerpt:

March 17th marked the 80th anniversary of the creation of the Ukrainian National Committee. With the Red Army rapidly advancing on Berlin, Nazi officials released Ukrainian ultranationalist military units from their command, and recognised the Committee – and a newly-formed National Army under its control – as the legitimate government of Ukraine. It was hoped the UNC would continue Hitler’s crusade against the Soviet Union following Berlin’s rapidly impending defeat in World War II, which occurred two months later.

The UNC’s establishment was eagerly supported by notorious Ukrainian ultranationalist Stepan Bandera, founder of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B) and Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), two ultranationalist factions heavily complicit in the Holocaust. As the mainstream media has acknowledged, his legacy endures in modern Ukraine, in the form of Neo-Nazi military units such as Azov Regiment, and he remains a much-celebrated figure in certain quarters of the country – much to the chagrin of Kiev’s Eastern European neighbours.

Continue reading in Substack: https://www.kitklarenberg.com/p/stepan-banderas-sinister-mi6-alliance

A modern celebration of Bandera, Ukraine

Additional information by Backups.blog :

#15. Documentary: “The Murder of Yugoslavia. The Shadow of Dayton.”

Documentary by Aleksei Denisov, 2015.

In 2015, the Russian news agency VGTRK released a documentary “The Murder of Yugoslavia. The Shadow of Dayton”. With the parallels in today’s Ukrainian conflict and NATO’s role in it, this documentary has become even more current than in 2015. Watch on Rumble.

On the 21st of November 1995 the information agencies of the world sent out an urgent news from the United States of America. On the military base in Dayton, the presidents of Serbia, Croatia, and the leaders of Bosnian Muslims signed an agreement on the cessation of civil war in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
In accordance with it, this part of the former Yugoslavia was now divided into the Muslim Croatian Federation and the Serbian Republic.
…
The Serbs, who controlled almost 75% of Bosnia and Herzegovina, made serious concessions and agreed to keep only 49% of the territory.
This was done to end the civil war, which by that time had actually destroyed the former Yugoslavia.

Source: X

Professor Jeffrey Sachs on Yugoslavia, NATO, Serbia, Kosovo, violation of international law

Economist Jeffrey Sachs revealed that the key reason for NATO aggression against Yugoslavia was to move military infrastructure closer to Russia’s borders, making the claim during an interview with American journalist Tucker Carlson. “We bombed a capital of Europe for 78 days…. We broke apart Serbia, established by our declaration a new country, Kosovo. We put a huge NATO base there, and that was the goal,” said Sachs, describing how the US violated international law and committed atrocities in a sovereign nation.

The entire interview / click:

#11. Ukraine and NATO

Latest update: February 21, 2025

INDEX:

  1. NATO’S GROWTH — AND RUSSIA’S ISOLATION – SINCE 1990 – TWO MAPS
  2. NATO EXPANSION 1948 – 2023
  3. STOLTENBERG, NATO, USA, UKRAINE, JOIN THE FAR RIGHT IN CANADA, OCTOBER 5, 2021
  4. STOLTENBERG ADMITS NATO PROVOKED THE ESCALATION OF THE UKRAINE RUSSIA WAR
  5. FORMER GERMAN CHANCELLOR SCHRÖDER: “UKRAINIANS WERE NOT ALLOWED TO AGREE TO PEACE”
  6. THE TALKS THAT COULD HAVE ENDED THE WAR IN UKRAINE
  7. NORDSTREAM, THE TERRORIST ATTACK ON EUROPE’S ECONOMY
  8. QUESTIONING NATO: NORDSTREAM TERRORIST ATTACK ON EUROPE’S ECONOMY
  9. QUESTIONUNG NATO: NATO CONTINUES PROVOKING MORE ESCALATION OF THE WAR IN UKRAINE (added 24 April 2024)
  10. JEFFREY SACHS: UKRAINE AND NATO
  11. NATO MEMBERSHIP WAS DEEPLY UNPOPULAR AMONG UKRAINIANS
  12. MAP: BANDERA VERSUS LENIN MONUMENTS IN UKRAINE (added April 24, 2024)
  13. ZELENSKY’S ADVISOR, ALEXEY ARESTOVICH, IN 2019
  14. GLENN DIESEN: DO THE EU AND NATO THREATEN RUSSIAN SECURITY?
  15. NATO SECRETARY GENERAL JENS STOLTENBERG SELLING THE PROXY WAR
  16. NATO SECREATRY GENERAL JAAP DE HOOP SCHEFFER ABOUT PUTIN’S RED LINE (2008)
  17. FORMER SECRETARY GENERAL OF NATO, ANDERS FOGH RASMUSSEN: “WE ALREADY DECIDED IN 2008 THAT UKRAINE WILL JOIN NATO”
  18. THE GUARDIAN ARTICLE 2008: PUTIN WARNS OVER NATO EXPANSION (added 24 April 2024)
  19. PEPE ESCOBAR: EURASIA VS. NATOSTAN IS THE DEFINING STRUGGLE OF OUR TIME
  20. GLENN DIESEN: THE UKRAINE WAR AND THE EURASIAN WORLD ORDER
  21. NATO – VIDEO COLLECTION
  22. ISW: WEBSITE of the INTERNATIONAL STUDY OF WAR / KAROLINA HIRD / NATO CHAIR ROB BAUER
  23. THE NATO DECLARATION AND THE DEADLY STRATEGY OF NEOCONSERVATISM / JEFFREY SACHS
  24. CYBERATTACKS: A NEW FALSE FLAG FRONTIER – KIT KLARENBERG – SUBSTACK

1. NATO’S GROWTH — AND RUSSIA’S ISOLATION – SINCE 1990 – TWO MAPS

CNBC, Maps and Article – https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/19/two-maps-show-natos-growth-and-russias-growing-isolation-since-1990.html / Published: May 19, 2022

2. NATO EXPANSION 1948 – 2023

Update February 21, 2025: The video published here is not longer available on YouTube because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated.

The video was copied by Multerland in 2024, and now uploaded in Multerland.

March 2024:

3. STOLTENBERG, NATO, USA, UKRAINE, JOIN THE FAR RIGHT IN CANADA, OCTOBER 5, 2021

Left to right: Mike Pompeo (U.S. Secretary of State); Chrystia Freeland (then-Minister of Foreign Affairs, Canada); Pavlo Klimkin (Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ukraine); NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. (Image: NATO/Flickr)

Article: Canada’s support for the far-right abroad
https://rabble.ca/politics/world-politics/canadas-support-for-the-far-right-abroad/
Published: October 5, 2021
By: Ives Engler
In: Rabble / Canada

4. STOLTENBERG ADMITS NATO PROVOKED THE ESCALATION OF THE UKRAINE RUSSIA WAR

-See the two maps above, showing the isolation of Russia, that started in 1990.

5. FORMER GERMAN CHANCELLOR SCHRÖDER: “UKRAINIANS WERE NOT ALLOWED TO AGREE TO PEACE”

6. THE TALKS THAT COULD HAVE ENDED THE WAR IN UKRAINE IN 2022

To be able to read the complete texts of the 2 post: click the post / show more

7. NORDSTREAM, THE TERRORIST ATTACK ON EUROPE’S ECONOMY

UK insurers refuse to pay Nord Stream because blasts were ‘government’ backed
https://thegrayzone.com/2024/04/17/uk-insurers-refuse-pay-nord-stream/
Published: April 17, 2024
In: The Grayzone
By: Wyatt Reed

8. QUESTIONING NATO: NORDSTREAM TERRORIST ATTACK ON EUROPE’S ECONOMY

Video short: https://youtube.com/shorts/FVbEoZXhCrM?si=O9jZ_G0YDclIFS74

“We can make an end to Nordstream”: read more about H.A.A.R.P. alike electromagnetic war weapons, able to penetrate deep inside the earth, seas and oceans, to destroy also pipelines: HAARP, JRO, EISCAT and SURA

9. QUESTIONUNG NATO: NATO CONTINUES PROVOKING MORE ESCALATION OF THE WAR IN UKRAINE (added 24 April 2024)

10. JEFFREY SACHS: UKRAINE AND NATO

See also:
Click picture to watch. See also article: Biden has destroyed Ukraine

11. NATO MEMBERSHIP WAS DEEPLY UNPOPULAR AMONG UKRAINIANS

On April 5, 2024, Professor Glenn Diesen shared on X: The polling below reveals NATO membership was deeply unpopular among Ukrainians even AFTER Russia took back Crimea: – Between 1991 and 2014 (before the coup), all polls revealed only 20% of Ukrainians wanted to join NATO, despite fierce efforts by the US.

GALLUP, Broadcasting Board of Governors Research Series [2014]: https://www.usagm.gov/wp-content/media/2014/06/Ukraine-slide-deck.pdf

Comment on this map by professor Glenn Diesen, published April 26, 2024:

In my previous post, there are several requests for evidence that only a small minority of Ukrainians wanted NATO membership between 1991 and 2014 (when the US/NATO sought to pull Ukraine into the military bloc):

  • Every since poll from Ukraine and abroad confirmed this.
  • NATO reported in 2011 that its expansionism was resisted by the Ukrainian government and its people: “The greatest challenge for Ukrainian-NATO relations lies in the perception of NATO among the Ukrainian people. NATO membership is not widely supported in the country, with some polls suggesting that popular support of it is less than 20%”. https://nato-pa.int/document/2011-172-cdsdg-11-e-rev1-ukraine-malan-report…
  • Even after Russia seized Crimea (in response to the US-backed coup), the US own polls demonstrated that still only a minority of Ukrainians wanted NATO membership. https://usagm.gov/wp-content/media/2014/06/Ukraine-slide-deck.pdf…
  • US Ambassador (now CIA Director) William Burn cautioned that NATO expansionism would trigger a Civil War exactly because it did not have support in the public (and that Russia would reluctantly invade). https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/08MOSCOW265_a.html…
  • There is nothing controversial about the statement that NATO expansionism was pushed against the will of the Ukrainians, with our full awareness of the likely devastating consequences.
  • The only reason this is not common knowledge is because the media does not report on it, as there is full conformity to the war narrative that we are merely “helping” Ukraine. Even mentioning verifiable facts results in attacks and cancellation efforts from the compliant media as inconvenient facts are met with accusations of “legitimising” the Russian invasion
  • On the eve of the American invasion of Iraq, a majority of Americans believed that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 9-11 attacks. This would not have been possible without a dishonest and manipulative media. In our current Ukraine War, the war enthusiasts in media play an equally manipulative role in ensuring public support for the notion that “weapons are the path to peace” and diplomacy is not possible. American leaders and the NATO Secretary General keep openly making statements that this war is a great opportunity to weaken a strategic adversary without losing their own soldiers, and the media assists in laundering this as a virtuous “pro-Ukrainian” stance.

12. MAP: BANDERA VERSUS LENIN MONUMENTS IN UKRAINE

Map by Harvard University which shows the ratio of Bandera (Ukrainian fascist) vs Lenin monuments in Ukraine. Compare the map above, chapter 11, that shows which part of Ukraine was the most pro NATO, with this one:

13. ZELENSKY’S ADVISOR, ALEXEY ARESTOVICH, IN 2019

Zelensky’s advisor, Alexey Arestovich, argued in 2019: – Attempting to join NATO will pressure Russia to invade – “Our price for joining NATO is a big war with Russia” – Predicting the war would start between 2020-22, with remarkable details

14. GLENN DIESEN: DO THE EU AND NATO THREATEN RUSSIAN SECURITY? (BOOK)

The book [2015] explores the rise of these exclusive ’inter-democratic’ security institutions after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the ensuing effects on relations with Russia. By: Glenn Diesen https://www.routledge.com/EU-and-NATO-Relations-with-Russia-After-the-Collapse-of-the-Soviet-Union/Diesen/p/book/9781138063273 /

Preview: https://www.book2look.com/embed/9781317140528

Description

Do the EU and NATO threaten Russian security? The book explores the rise of these exclusive ’inter-democratic’ security institutions after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the ensuing effects on relations with Russia. Two competing theories are tested to explore whether these institutions aggravate or mitigate the security dilemma with Russia. These institutions can be theorised to promote security as a positive-sum game through European integration and democracy promotion, or pursue collective hegemony with ideologically uncompromising bloc-politics. Glenn Diesen argues that a European security architecture that demotes the largest state on the continent to an object of security inevitably results in ’European integration’ becoming a zero-sum geopolitical project that has set the West on a collision course with Russia.

Table of contents

  • Chapter 1 Introduction;
  • Chapter 2 Theoretical Comparison;
  • Chapter 3 Research Design;
  • Chapter 4 Case Study I;
  • Chapter 5 Case Study II;
  • Chapter 6; Conclusion;

Critics reviews

’In this innovative, theoretically grounded and systematic study, Glenn Diesen shows how the attempts by the EU and NATO to construct a security community in Europe have exacerbated the security dilemma with Russia. The arguments in this fine book are crucial to our understanding of the international relations of the European continent since the collapse of the Soviet Union.’ Graeme Gill, The University of Sydney, Australia ’In the light of the Ukraine crisis and the Russian annexation of Crimea, this is a timely and important book. Glenn Diesen provides a well-argued and theoretically rich critique of Western policy towards Russia since the breakup of the Soviet Union. His analysis challenges many of the mainstream liberal assumptions that have shaped relations between Europe and Russia, and offers a fresh interpretation of the steady deterioration in relations between the two sides. This is a book that deserves to be widely read and discussed.’ Adrian Hyde-Price, Gothenburg University, Sweden

15. NATO SECRETARY GENERAL SELLING THE PROXY WAR

16. NATO SECRETARY GENERAL JAAP DE HOOP SCHEFFER ABOUT PUTIN’S RED LINE (2008)

Watch on Rumble: here

17. FORMER SECRETARY GENERAL OF NATO, ANDERS FOGH RASMUSSEN: “WE ALREADY DECIDED IN 2008 THAT UKRAINE WILL JOIN NATO”

18. THE GUARDIAN ARTICLE 2008: PUTIN WARNS NATO OVER EXPANSION

This article is more than 16 years old
Putin warns NATO over expansion
Published: Fri 4 Apr 2008
In: The Guardian
By: Anil Dawar

PDF

19. PEPE ESCOBAR: EURASIA VS. NATOSTAN IS THE DEFINING STRUGGLE OF OUR TIME

In this interview Kevork Almassian, award-winning independent journalist and political scientist, born in Syria and living in Berlin, Germany, discusses with Pepe Escobar the book: Eurasia versus NATOstan, published on April 2, 2024. Pepe Escobar (born 1954) is a Brazilian journalist and geopolitical analyst.

20. GLENN DIESEN: THE UKRAINE WAR AND THE EURASIAN WORLD ORDER (BOOK)

Five hundred years of Western hegemony has ended, while the global majority’s aspiration for a world order based on multipolarity and sovereign equality is rising. This incisive book addresses the demise of liberal hegemony, though pointing out that a multipolar Westphalian world order has not yet taken shape, leaving the world in a period of interregnum. A legal vacuum has emerged, in which the conflicting sides are competing to define the future order.

NATO expansionism was an important component of liberal hegemony as it was intended to cement the collective hegemony of the West as the foundation for a liberal democratic peace. Instead, it dismantled the pan-European security architecture and set Europe on the path to war without the possibility of a course correction. Ukraine as a divided country in a divided Europe has been a crucial pawn in the great power competition between NATO and Russia for the past three decades.

The war in Ukraine is a symptom of the collapsing world order. The war revealed the dysfunction of liberal hegemony in terms of both power and legitimacy, and it sparked a proxy war between the West and Russia instead of ensuring peace, the source of its legitimacy.
The proxy war, unprecedented sanctions, and efforts to isolate Russia in the wider world contributed to the demise of liberal hegemony as opposed to its revival. Much of the world responded to the war by intensifying their transition to a Eurasian world order that rejects hegemony and liberal universalism. The economic architecture is being reorganised as the world diversifies away from excessive reliance on Western technologies, industries, transportation corridors, banks, payment systems, insurance systems, and currencies. Universalism based on Western values is replaced by civilisational distinctiveness, sovereign inequality is swapped with sovereign equality, socialising inferiors is replaced by negotiations, and the rules-based international order is discarded in favour of international law. A Westphalian world order is reasserting itself, although with Eurasian characteristics.

The West’s defeat of Russia would restore the unipolar world order while a Russian victory would cement a multipolar one. The international system is now at its most dangerous as the prospect of compromise is absent, meaning the winner will take all. Both NATO under US direction and Russia are therefore prepared to take great risks and escalate, making nuclear wan increasingly likely.

English:
The Ukraine War and the Eurasian World Order
Published: February 15, 2024
https://www.amazon.com/Ukraine-War-Eurasian-World-Order/dp/1949762955

Nederlands:
De oorlog in Oekraïne en de Euraziatische wereldorde
https://deblauwetijger.com/product/glenn-diesen-de-oorlog-in-oekraine-en-de-euraziatische-wereldorde/

21. NATO – VIDEO COLLECTION

In the upper right corner of the video-playlist below, you can see three horizontal lines and an arrow. Click to see the entire playlist.

22. THE INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF WAR / KAROLINA HIRD / ROB BAUER (NATO CHAIR)

Search results for Karolina Hird, on the website of the ISW: 964 results.

From the website: Karolina Hird is a Russia Deputy Team Lead and Analyst and Evans Hanson Fellow at the Institute for the Study of War. Karolina is a senior member of the team that produces the daily Russian Campaign Assessments since spring 2022. Karolina particularly focuses on Russian operational campaign design and the humanitarian aspects of the war in Ukraine, particularly the issue of forced deportations and adoption of Ukrainian children. Karolina has been quoted in Reuters, The Telegraph, NPR, The Daily Beast, Task and Purpose, Newsweek, Voice of America, and others. Karolina regularly briefs senior military and political decision-makers. Karolina received a BA in International Affairs from The George Washington University, where she focused on international security, international law, and gender analysis.

[Note by admin: the content of the quoted text copied from her profile page on ISW, is not according to the information that is provided by independent journalists. This means that the quoted text has to be read as misinformation. Important detail: Karolina Hird is extremely anti-Putin, anti-Russia.]

In this article, published by ISW, also chair of NATO Rob Bauer‘s words, are to be found. He is clearly informed by Karolina Hird, which means that he is misinformed about the real situation in Ukraine. In his opening speech on May 16, 2024, in a NATO meeting with the Chiefs of Defence, in Brussels, he mentions Kiev as the source of his information, which means that he fully trusts Zelensky, who is proven not reliable. Altogether this could be the reason why Rob Bauer showed that he was severe misinformed and was sharing misinformation with the Chiefs of Defence. That could be the reason of the NATO arrogance, it’s bluffing about Russia, and making NATO alliances believe that they have a chance against Russia. His misinformation is provoking WWIII.

23. THE NATO DECLARATION [10 JULY 2024] AND THE DEADLY STRATEGY OF NEOCONSERVATISM / JEFFREY SACHS

For the sake of America’s security and world peace, the U.S. should immediately abandon the neocon quest for hegemony in favor of diplomacy and peaceful co-existence.
https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/nato-neoconservatism-empire
Published: July 13, 2024
By: Jeffrey Sachs
In: Common Dreams

U.S. President Joe Biden delivers remarks at a meeting of the heads of state of the North Atlantic Council at the 2024 NATO Summit on July 10, 2024 in Washington, DC.
 (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

24. CYBERATTACKS: A NEW FALSE FLAG FRONTIER – KIT KLARENBERG

Read full article on Substack

#8. Norway: cancellation and censorship of science

Introduction

On February 14, 2024, Professor Glenn Diesen[1][2][3][4] published several posts[1][2][3][4] on X in which he reports on the cancel and censorship culture, as practiced by the Norwegian Aage Borchgrevink[1]. Although Borchgrevink is listed on various websites and Wikipedia pages as a human rights activist, works at the Norwegian Helsinki Committee, and is chairman of the Norwegian NFFO, the Norwegian Non-Fiction Writers and Translators Association, he is not who he pretends to be.
What Glenn Diesen describes in the following articles, posted on X, corresponds with the experiences so many others and also I had with Aage Borchgrevink on X: there is zero willingness to be informed about the scientific facts regarding political issues. He distorts facts, creates misinformation, and is a USA propaganda activist, not a human rights activist. The same applies to the Helsinki Committee, and the NFFO.

1. The Norwegian Non-Fiction Writers and Translators Association (NFFO)

…….. announced that they cancelled their participation as a co-organiser for a public debate about the conflict in the Middle East because I am one of the speakers. I wear this as a badge of honour. One of Norway’s leading propagandists who has been writing hit-pieces about me for years in the media just happens to be a chairman of NFFO who announced the cancellation. So, the person behind the organisation that cancelled their participation, because I am allegedly controversial, is the same person who has been working tirelessly to depict me as controversial to have me fired as a professor from the university. These are two cheeks of the same arse, but this is conveniently omitted by those reporting on this story.

I do not use the term “propagandist” lightly. This propagandist works for the Helsinki Committee, a “human rights organisation” financed by the CIA-cutout National Endowment for Democracy (NED). When Reagan established NED as an extension of the CIA in 1983, it was to manipulate civil society in other countries (see tweet below). NED and its proxies only focus on human rights in adversarial states and thus sell all great power conflicts as a fight between democracy and authoritarianism (good vs evil), while claiming the source credibility of a “human rights organisation” that enables them to dismiss critics as enemies of freedom. When this Norwegian “human rights activist” does not slander me in the media and shames my university for permitting academic freedom, he is campaigning against Julian Assange and other critics of the US.

This is not simply an issue to a silly propagandist discrediting NFFO. Censorship, cancellations and the corruption of institutions have detrimental effects on society. After a decade of war in Ukraine, Norwegians are still not exposed to any arguments and evidence that deviate from NATO’s narrative. Norway will give the US sovereign control over 15 military bases on its soil to confront Russia in the Arctic and Norway has become one of the most eager weapon suppliers in the Ukrainian proxy war – with almost no public debate about the impact on our security as only one argument is permitted and dissent comes with great social cost. Anyone attempting to explain the arguments of the opposing side can be denounced for “legitimising” the opponent and thus smeared as a “Putinist”.

Our discourse subsequently consists of clichés and slogans without substance, simplified and dumbed down to a narrative of goodies versus baddies in which ever-more weapons are the path to peace, diplomacy and negotiations are dangerous, and censorship is vital to protect our democracy.

All is not well with freedom of speech and academic freedom in this country. I have published 11 academic books, which have been translated into several languages. Yet, an organisation devoted to academic writing cancelled their participation as a co-organiser because a ridiculous NED-financed “human rights activist” has accused me of working for Russia. Also, the debate they withdrew support from is not even about Russia, but the Middle East…

2. The Norwegian Helsinki Committee

…….. should be designated as a propaganda organisation due to its funding from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED): – Washington Post writes that NED has been the “sugar daddy of overt operations” and “what used to be called ‘propaganda’ and can now simply be called ‘information'”. – NED was inaugurated by President Reagan to conceal influence operations by US intelligence as work on democracy and human rights. – Documents released by the Reagan presidential library reveal that NED cooperated closely with CIA propaganda initiatives. – Allen Weinstein, a cofounder of NED, acknowledged: “a lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA”. – Philip Agee, a CIA whistle-blower, explained that NED was established as a “propaganda and inducement program” to subvert foreign nations and style it as a democracy promotion initiatives.

The Norwegian Helsinki Committee wrote a 7-page long article about me (plus front page), in which they pressured the university to terminate my employment as I allegedly violate international law by supporting Russian war propaganda. – This is a strange allegation as I have been very openly opposed to the war from day one, but my crime as a professor of Russian politics has been to engage with Russian media. And this is allegedly in breach of international law. – The article makes no sense and was published in a newspaper where the author’s wife is an editor, but it is nonetheless cited in numerous efforts to censor and cancel. – It is beyond absurd that government-funded “non-governmental organisations” masquerading as “human rights organisations” can routinely attack academic freedoms and manipulate civil society in our country to ensure there is only one acceptable narrativ

3. Tweets by Aage Borchgrevink

Notice how in all these tweets (and all his articles), he attempts to shame the university into cancelling dissent. Is this normal for a state-financed “human rights activist” and a chairman of an organisation for authors? Click picture to enlarge:

4. Borchgrevink’s cancellation

He is very proud to censor and cancel. Unworthy of an open society. Click picture to enlarge.

5. Professor Glenn Diesen about the Tucker Carlsen interview with Vladimir Putin

The subjects “propaganda“, “freedom of speech“, and “censorship” start at 16:34 in the video ”Is America in decline: The US could lose the war against Russia – CBC Weekly Talk (Azerbaijan)”

Anastasia Lavrina: I don’t know if you watched the last interview of Vladimir Putin to American journalist Tucker Carlson and immediately after the West started to criticize the journalist for this interview. Why do you think the West turned against the American journalist in this particular interview is there any specific issues on the agenda?

Glenn Diesen: Well, they denounced the interview as propaganda before had even been released so I think it’s quite obvious that this doesn’t look good in terms of our principle of free speech because a lot of the attacks you know calling him a Putin puppet and you know this kind of name calling it’s not just childish but it’s also completely devoid of any substance. There’s no real criticism of you know the questions he asked or the direction he took it, so I think it demonstrates I think an unwillingness to present the opposite side of the argument and this is a huge problem.
I always make the point that at least during the Cold War we knew what Moscow’s arguments were. We didn’t feel the need to censor it but these days there’s a huge amount of censorship going on now here in the west, not only censoring Russian media but also journalist academics within the West who dare to explain what the Russians are thinking, what they’re doing, are accused of legitimizing what the Russians are doing, and one sees the call for censorship and cancellation immediately arises, so I think that a lot of the war narrative which we have been building over the past two years is based on their flawed assumption.

I don’t think many people anymore in the west really know much about very basic facts which can be proven, so I think there’s a huge concern that the whole narrative for war is disappearing and so the the need for narrative control. I think this is the greatest concern, and why there was such a fierce opposition to the Tucker Carlson interview of President Putin.

6. Glenn Diesen about Arestovych, the former advisor of Zelensky, and propaganda

Click to read the tweet.

~~~

Glenn Diesen: The Ukraine War & The Eurasian World Order

Amazon – list with books

#7. The Russian

As a child (I was born in 1948) I knew the name Jozef Stalin (1878-1953) because my father (1909-1992) hated him deeply. Until his death he regularly spoke about Stalin. Also about “de Rus”, Dutch for “the Russian”. To me “de Rus” was a synonym for fear. That fear arose when “de Rus” invaded Hungary (1956), and during the Cuba crisis (1962). My parents had conversations at the kitchen table about an imminent war, while not so long before they themselves had gone through World War II, each with horrible experiences. So another war was imminent. Their fear was utterly strong. though I did not understand anything, I was sensing something that I never sensed before: fear. Fear was since then connected with “de Rus”, The Russian, the Russians, Russia.

Now that I have seen the two hours and 12 minutes long documentary “State Funeral” (divided into parts, fragmented by myself) I understand my father’s hatred for Stalin, and also my parents’ fear of “de Rus”. Now that I’ve seen that documentary, I’m pretty sure that “de Rus” was also afraid of who “we” are. The West. “De Rus” however, was not only afraid of the West. Also for Stalin. Though there are Russians who admired him, and still. Admiration and fear can walk hand in hand, though. The same might is used in religions..

Although the documentary only shows footages of Stalin’s state funeral, and nothing else than that, but at the same time encompassing it all, I now understand how indescribably great the might of Stalin’s regime was, AND the agony for him, so intense, that you really have to watch, those more than two hours, to be able to fathom what that man did to the Russian people, and what has nourished that unprecedented glorification of Stalin: fear. Even after his death. That is my impression. I am certain that not one Russian dared to stay home. Not one who did not dare NOT to cry, or to look relieved. That is my sincere conclusion.

The documentary ends with this text:

According to historical research, more than 27,000,000 Soviet citizens were murdered, executed, tortured to death, imprisoned, sent to Gulag labour camps, or deported during Stalin’s regime. An additional 15,000,000 people are estimated to have starved to death.

Note: my fear for “de Rus” disappeared completely, during my life. I write about that in my article: Russian troll? In my article I explain the word “Russophobia“.

#6. Russophobia

Updated: February 15, 2024

This post is a comment on the video “Ugly and Russophobic”, that was published on YouTube by Jeffrey Sachs. The video has been removed however, by Jeffrey Sachs. The United Nations has published a video about Russophobia as well: ‘Russophobia’ Term Used to Justify Moscow’s War Crimes in Ukraine (Briefer) | United Nations

I have watched Jeffrey Sachs’s video before it was removed, and I can and have to state therefore that he did not use the word Russophobia to justify Russian war crimes in Ukraine, at all. He explained, that the in the west started russophobia is used by the west to create hatred against Russia in order to make their own proxy war, their provoked war, their provocations towards Russia, legal, justified. A kind of: “It is necessary to kill the Russians.” Sachs is right.

I consider the conclusion of the UN, that the word russophobia is used to justify Russian war crimes, as a misinterpretation, misinformation, therefore false, and even very effective western propaganda for the war industry.

My comment on the word “russophobia”.

It started a long time ago. In 1956 I was 8 years young and sensed the intense fear of my parents for the Russians who invaded Hungary. My father was a Russophobe: the reason for that were Stalin, Khrushchev, and what he knew about communism.

Russophobia. “Anti-Russian sentiment, commonly referred to as russophobia, is dislike or fear of Russia, the Russians, Russian culture, or Russian policy. The Collins English Dictionary defines it as intense and often irrational hatred of Russia. It is often related to anti-Soviet and occasionally also to anti-Slavic sentiment.” (Wiki)

In my opinion russophobia is a logic result, caused by the Russian Tsars, and the leaders of the communist party that followed after, like Stalin, Khrushchev. The word russophobia today is therefore in my opinion only the fear for Russian politics and their leaders.

People in the west were, because of the taboo in the west to be interested in Russia, Russian culture and so on, not informed and mostly even misinformed about the Russian people, their culture. Western peoples assumed that Russians were enthusiastically following their leaders, and therefore to be disgusted.

The phobia for Russian political leaders however existed also in the Russian people, intensified sometimes to unbearable levels, transformed because of that into an unstoppable courage. Russian composer Shostakovich’s Symphony No. 11 evokes the first uprising of 1905, when peasants stormed the Tsar’s Palace.

Painting by Russian painter Makovsky: The Ninth of January, 1905

The 1917 Russian Revolution brought an end to the power of the Tsar era, the Russian royal dictators.

This shows that the western interpretation of the word russophobia is based on the same fear and disgust as the common Russian people experienced for their own leaders and their politics.

Therefore the word russophobia should be replaced by a word that fathoms the fear in peoples, worldwide, for the [totalitarian] regime in their country, and the absence of, or censored independent journalism, next to physical, emotional and mental punishments, torture, terrorism that these regimes practice against those who could be a threat for informing the people about facts, and create revolutions.

This kind of regimes are everywhere, and yes, also USA, EU, the entire “democratic” west, have regime-like governments that practice and/or contribute to censorship, shadow banning, torture, terrorism, murder, cruelties. [Julian Assange]

My conclusion: The phobia for Russia is not sustainable: it does not create any positive perspective or condition for a real future for mankind. The future is cooperation, and only cooperation, which is possible when there is a will to communicate, to talk, and to find the hard core of the problems, the truth of it. The common sense of solutions. Phobia is hatred, fear is hatred, it is a closed door to communication and negotiation. It is based on one-sided information, indoctrination, ignorance, is based on absence of self reflection. Factually Russophobia is based on the phobia for the True Self, the psychological dark side, the darkness of the unconsciousness within, whereabout Carl Gustav Jung spoke and wrote, and it is within every single human being.

Others are the mirror of the self. You see in another one what is inside of you, but are not aware of. You cannot remove the dirt from the glass of the mirror: it is not there. USA does the same with Russia, and all who are Russophobic should watch inside and check there that one should work at, and solve. USA is scared to watch and admit the existence of their own darkness. USA prefers to show the mask of The Saviour of Humanity. It works. USA shows how easy it is fool people, to control the media, to mislead people, to indoctrinate people, to create enemies, to create hatred, to fuel hatred, that make people believe that the war-industry is a deity, a holy must, and the war crimes are legitimate. Finally people like war. It is good. Their hatred grows into unstoppable passionate aggression, lust for war. There is even war in the social media, and if one is against USA, you are of course for Putin[post number 8], a Russian troll. I am against war. It is outdated and will sooner or later extinct all life forms. War has to be exterminated. It can! By truth.

Additional

  1. Russophobia – Professor Glenn Diesen – See Springer Link
  2. Biden sells weapon to majority of authoritarian regimes https://theintercept.com/2023/05/11/united-states-foreign-weapons-sales/…
    • Published: May 11, 2023
    • In: The Intercept
    • By: Stephen Semler
  3. Documentary (2019) “State Funeral“, the funeral of Joseph Stalin. / The documentary ends with: According to historical research, more than 27 million Soviet citizens were murdered, executed, tortured to death, imprisoned, sent to Gulag labor camps, or deported during Stalin’s regime. An additional 15 million people are estimated to have starved to death.
  4. Shostakovich Against Stalin – The War Symphonies
  5. Superpower. The only thing new in the world is the history you don’t know.’
  6. Julian Assange / Assange-phobia: the phobia of the US and NATO for being unveiled.
  7. More videos about
  8. Video:

#5. The MH17 case has to re-start from scratch (new evidence)

A. INTRO

The original post, published April 28, 2023, was titled: “MH17”, and, has been ENTIRELY changed on May 6, 2026, because of the recently published scientific book: The Russia-Ukraine War and its Origins (professor Ivan Katchanovski), and another book: What I saw in Ukraine (Benoît Paré, international observer), but also because the two links to Bellingcat had become meaningless: in 2023, when I published the original post, both links were directing to a Bellingcat web-page with a picture of a BUK, Russian made, in 2008, in Ukraine. The articles were still there, but the pictures of the BUK, with the text that included the year 2008, and that it were Russian BUKs, are gone.

B. INDEX

1. New Evidence

THOUGH DENIED IN THE FINAL CONCLUSION OF THE COURT CASE IN 2022, THERE WAS INDEED A WAR ONGOING IN UKRAINE IN JULY 2014, WHEN THE MH17 FLEW OVER UKRAINE

2. Responsibility and accountability

Unanswered questions, ignored questions, not asked questions that have to be answered, because possible to answer today via the new evidence about the real culprit. The real culprit is the west. Not Moscow.

3. To be investigated: the role of Rutte
  • 3a. Rutte today, as NATO secretary general. His warmongering, undiplomatic, provocative behaviour
  • 3b. TO BE INVESTIGATED: Rutte’s role in the MH17 story
  • 3c. TO BE INVESTIGATED: the procedure of becoming a NATO secretary general
4. The role of Kiev, Porochenko and USA

Accountable for the downing of the MH17. Porochenko, and therefore USA as well, since Porochenko was a western marionette, knew, was informed, and silenced what he knew. He has committed perjury.

5. Re-opening the MH17 case
  • The books of Ivan Katchanovski, Benoît Paré, and the White Book, published by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation in March 2014, plus the NYT article, published on June 14, 2014, and the in 1 mentioned Human Rights Watch articles, plus the documentary about Donbass, are crucial to create an exact view on the real political situation in Ukraine, to be able to find the real culprit, within the downing of the MH17.
  • The books did not exist yet on November 17, 2022 (court decision).
  • The NYT article however did indeed exist, but was “overlooked”(?), together with the Human Rights Watch letter and articles, plus The White Book, a report of violations of human rights in Ukraine from November 2013 till March 2014, published by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. This study was not taken into account, which proves that the Judges in the court case were not objective, but committed to the NATO / Pentagon, Washington scenario.
  • All this together shows that the court case end result was a scam, therefore illegal, and has to be re-opened, to start from scratch.
6. Wikipedia spreads misinformation and blocks world peace.
  • 6a. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE, WHY NOT?
  • 6b. The Wikipedia MH17 data from 2014 has been completely deleted.
  • 6c. The Wikipedia version of the MH17 today
  • 6d. The Wikipedia page about the Maidan Massacre has to be completely revised
  • 6e. The Wikipedia page about Ukraine must be completely revised
7. Consortium news

Hundred articles (with comments) about the downing of MH17, by independent investigative journalists

8. Kees van der Pijl’s scholarly work on the downing of the MH17, amidst the Ukrainian war

“Flight MH17, Ukraine and the new Cold War: Prism of disaster“
Author: Kees van der Pijl
Publisher ‏: ‎ Manchester University Press
Publication date : ‎ July 11, 2018
Edition : ‎ 1st
Language: ‎ English
Print length: ‎ 208 pages
ISBN-10: ‎ 1526131099
ISBN-13: ‎ 978-1526131096

This is the first scholarly work on the Ukrainian unrest (today, May 2026, proven to be a war, by professor Ivan Katchanovski, admin.) and the tragic downing of MH17. It offers an analysis that challenges the Western consensus surrounding these events, emphasising the geopolitical and economic context of the West’s standoff with Russia, the BRICS bloc, and the struggles over the EU’s energy supply.
Based on previously unpublished government and NATO documents as well as a wide array of sources this book offers an analysis of global political economy and contemporary debates about Russia and East-West relations.

Playlist MH17

1. NEW EVIDENCE – THE CIVIL WAR STARTED IN EARLY 2014, AND ESCALATED BEFORE JULY 2014

THOUGH DENIED IN THE FINAL CONCLUSION OF THE COURT CASE IN 2022, THERE WAS INDEED A WAR ONGOING IN UKRAINE IN JULY 2014, WHEN THE MH17 FLEW OVER UKRAINE

The October 2025 published book: “The Russia-Ukraine War and its Origins“, written by professor Ivan Katchanovski, offers the evidence that in early 2014 a by the USA well-prepared civil war started in Ukraine, as part of the total war somewhere in the future, with Russia. All started in Kiev, with the Maidan Massacre [17 February 2014], the killing of hundred innocent people, by pro-USA forces. This has been in-depth investigated by professor Ivan Katchanovsky, and been exposed via his analyses of many videos that have also been used also as evidence during a trial. Also the court sessions have been filmed, and are published on professor Katchanovsky’s YouTube channel. The Maidan Massacre was the intro to the also by the USA well-prepared and backed coup, that took place in Kiev, on February 21, 2014. [Watch: discussion about the book.]

This book creates therefore also the immediate necessity of a re-opening of the MH17 case: because on July 17, 2014, there was a war in South East Ukraine, between separatists in Donbass (the MH17 was flying over Donbass/ Donetsk, so over a war zone in Ukraine) and the USA/Kiev regime, under the full control of Washington, in which many thousands1 of Ukrainians were killed in the South East, by Kiev.

Donbass, a documentary, made by Anne Laure Bonnel, after she travelled to Donbass on January 15, 2015, to film the unbelievable. The documentary was published on her YouTube channel in 2022.


Porochenko in 2014:
“We will have benefits for pensioners and children, they will not!
Our children will go to school and kindergarden, their children will stay in the cellars!
Because they can’t do anything.
And that’s how, precisely that, we will win this war.”

WAR
Mind the word “war“, because this is a rejected detail in the MH17 court case, and reason why the final court decision plead “guilty” into the direction of Russia. Benoît Paré shows in his book ( a diary), published in 2025, how the US-sponsored Ukrainian ultranationalist project provoked Moscow’s reaction. This is also a missing detail in the final court case decision. Reason why the court case has to be re-opened.

This website explains on November 15, 2014, that Poroshenko’s words have been taken out of the true context. However: the new scientific evidence of the reality in Ukraine came not earlier than 2025, via professor Ivan Katchanovski, and Benoît Paré. The study from March 2014 provided by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation in “White Book“, is not accepted as reliable (because Russian originated), while it has to be part of an independent investigation, independent media, and court cases (Lady Justice is independent).

Other reliable sources have simply been ignored, like the info provided by Human-Rights Watch, the info provided by Consortium News, the New York Times, and Voltaire Net. Taking this new, plus older but ignored, evidence into account here, the words Porochenko spoke, have to be understood exactly for what they are: western propaganda, pro NATO, pro USA, and anti-Russia.

Overview:
Professor Ivan Katchanovski 
The New York Times, June 14, 2014 (5 weeks before the downing of the MH17)

Separatists Down Military Transport Jet, Killing 49 in Eastern Ukraine

Human Rights Watch, June 30, 2014 (17 days before the downing of the MH17)

Ukraine: Escalation Triggers Laws of War

Human Rights Watch, July 5, 2014 (12 days before the downing of the MH17)

 Ukraine: A Day in Luhansk: War’s Crimes, Horrors, and Uncertainties

Human Rights Watch, July 18

Letter to President Poroshenko on military operations in Luhansk and Donetsk (report)

The documentary “Donbass”

The documentary “Donbass”, made by Anne-Laure Bonnel, January 2015, showing the war situation in Donbass, that started in early 2014. In this documentary Porochenko mentions the term “war” between the separatists and the Kiev regime.

The witness documentaries with interviews, made by Eva Karene Bartlett

The witness documentaries with interviews (2019-2024) with Ukrainians who live in the South East of Ukraine, published by Eva Karene Bartlett, show the full evidence that there was indeed a war in Donbass from February 2014.

The book: What I saw in Ukraine, Benoît Paré

 What I saw in Ukraine, 2015-2022 – Diary of an International Observer.

Jens Stoltenberg: NATO Expansion Was Key to Russian Invasion of Ukraine
  • Additional, aligned with Benoît Paré’s diary: Jens Stoltenberg, the Norwegian secretary general of NATO from 2014 to 2024, admits NATO Expansion Was Key to Russian Invasion of Ukraine: In this video Stoltenberg confesses:
  • “Then Putin declared in the autumn of 2021 and he actually sent a draft treaty that he wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement. That is what he sent us. That was a precondition for not to invade Ukraine. Of course we didn’t sign that. The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign a promise never to enlarge NATO. He wanted us to remove military infrastructure in all allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe. We should remove NATO from that part of our alliance. Introducing some kind of A and B, a second class membership. We rejected that. So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO close to his borders. He has got exact the opposite. He has got more NATO presence in the Eastern part of the alliance.” Source: X, Source: Jeffrey D. Sachs, Source: YouTube. More about Ukraine and NATO: https://backups.blog/2024/04/09/ukraine-and-nato/
  • Additional: Former NATO Secretary-General, the Dutch Jaap de Hoop Scheffer in 2008: Ukraine is the red line for Putin
  • Additional: Secretary of NATO from 2009-2014 the Danish Anders Fogh Rasmussen, is still a NATO lobbyist. He wrote the book: The Will to Lead: America’s Indispensable Role in the Global Fight for Freedom. The title is a scam, glorifying a CIA ruled, economic fascist regime [Economic Fascism][CIA: Undermining and Nazifying Ukraine Since 1953]. “The will to lead” is based on white supremacism, racism, modern colonialism, and derived from the ideological dreaming (phantasy), that USA has to be the hegemon [The US motivation is to be number one, (bottom page 5)]. The US does not fight for freedom, it follows a typically American crooks system: regime change everywhere possible in the world via a coup, followed by theft, exploitation of all what is below the surface of the soil of a country, like oil and rare minerals, and when all is taken, leaving the country ruined behind, and in extreme poverty. This is proven via statements, from former ambassadors, witnesses, colonels, CIA analysts, history writers, etc. to be found in this list: Political Analysts / Experts. Anders Fogh Rasmussen is therefore legalizing, even promoting the war in Ukraine, guilty of demonizing Russia, supporting a war-criminal regime in Washington and complicit, together with Stoltenberg and Rutte, in the elimination of young Ukrainians, who were and still are pushed (arrested on the streets and transported) to fight in a completely meaningless NATO war that could have been avoided, following logic, and diplomacy, in a very simple way. On NATO’s banner is written: “Provoke! Fight! Die! For us, NATO!” The USA is practicing pathological political meddling world wide, with the mask of the Good Guy, while being the aggressor, the human rights violator even in its own USA, and committing war crimes.
Read also:

2. RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY

The MH17 was flying over a war-zone, on July 17, 2014. Entire Ukraine was a war zone since February 2014, and reason why in the meantime passenger flights from London and Paris were avoiding the Ukrainian airspace.

Excerpt from a video, published in 2014, by Global News:

Missiles were crossing the skies above Ukraine, and yes, Kiev-Ukraine had its own anti-aircraft warfare, also buks, which were all made in Russia in that time. The in general Russian population in the south-east received support from Russia. The rest of Ukraine received support from the collective west. The NATO goal, and cause of the Russia-Ukraine war, the NATO membership of Ukraine, became official in 2008, but was already planned in 2002. The NATO membership was not the wish of the Ukrainian people:


On April 5, 2024, Professor Glenn Diesen shared on X: The polling reveals NATO membership was deeply unpopular among Ukrainians even AFTER Russia took back Crimea: – Between 1991 and 2014 (before the coup), all polls revealed only 20% of Ukrainians wanted to join NATO, despite fierce efforts by the US.

Left: Screenshot, taken from the (USA) Gallup map of Ukraine, 2012-2014

Question 1: Why did the new, pro-American Ukrainian government at the time, in 2014, not warn the Netherlands—a befriended nation, therefore, because it is pro-American—of the extreme danger concerning flying over a war zone, Donetsk/Donbass?

Question 2: Who is/are primarily liable for the downing of MH17?
Apparently—and one can state that this is highly remarkable or dangerously negligent—no briefing took place from Ukraine to the countries outside, the EU, and thus not with the Netherlands either; otherwise, this disaster would never have occurred. One may assume with certainty that the danger of an airplane crash in Kyiv was known, especially since the country was—and is—informed, supported, and coached by the USA. The USA has control over everything; it has informants and supervisors. The CIA. It is therefore evident that the Ukrainian government was fully aware of the war in Donetsk and of real and life-threatening dangers concerning air traffic in the airspace above Donetsk.

Question 3: When will people in Europe, in the Netherlands, become aware of the liability, of the unforgivable negligence of Ukraine and the USA in this matter?

Question 4: Is the withholding of information, the failure to issue warnings, resulting in such a disaster, to be charged as WAR CRIME, in this case committed by the USA and Ukraine?

3. TO BE INVESTIGATED: THE ROLE OF RUTTE

3a. Rutte today, as NATO secretary general.

Rutte is excessively active in spreading NATO war-propaganda, uses extremely provocative, rude, humiliating rhetoric, filled with delusional grandeur, misinformation and pathological lies. Unfortunately the one despicable video has been withdrawn from YouTube, recently published, the one in which Rutte requests parents to sacrifice their sons and daughters to the NATO war against Russia, while demonizing Putin, who has factually not asked anything else than a neutral Ukraine, and the end of NATO expansion, in order to protect his own people against NATO expansion and NATO aggression. Related with this subject are “NATO’s Cognitive Warfare“, and “State Terrorism and Cognitive Warfare – Understanding Propaganda“. About NATO expansion: click start; 2 minutes watch time…..

NATO expansion animation film, with updates till 2022. Finland and Sweden followed quickly later.

3b. TO BE INVESTIGATED: Rutte’s role in the MH17 story, his absent information to Schiphol and Malaysia that Ukraine’s airspace should be avoided: and THUS

1. his possible, even conscious choice in 2014, NOT to warn Schiphol in order to demonstrate to NATO that he is willing to do anything [the goal justifies the means] to become NATO Secretary General

2. and thus meet the conditions to pass the screening regarding 100% loyalty to NATO interests

3. and thus war industry interests, and to demonstrate cooperation with NATO objectives—in this case the downfall of Russia, the end of Russia—and create anti-Russia sentiment in the Netherlands and elsewhere in the world,

4. and THUS even willing sacrifice innocent civilians, in order to turn the anti-Russia sentiment into deep-black hatred, disgust, and to make the Dutch willing to sacrifice their children and grandchildren to a war that could have been prevented if the truth had come to light, but which is heavily censored.

Excerpt from a video, published in 2014, by Global News:

Note: The by the USA orchestrated and well prepared Maidan Massacre was a similar sacrifice of innocent people [shown by professor Ivan Katchanovski in his scientific work The Russia-Ukraine War and its Origins] to realize the political goal: an overthrow of the pro-Russia government in Kiev, via a coup, that was following some days later. My hypothesis: The sacrifice of the passengers and crew of the MH17 was used by USA/NATO to create deep-felt Russia hatred, and legalize a war against Russia, to create pro-USA sentiment, and to create anti-Russia sentiment.

Rutte, who has shown during his 4 cabinets, daring to behave inhumane 2,3, has not shown a single sign of compassion, ever, is granite-hard, and is now the VVD [Dutch right wing political party] “whisperer”. During the latest decennia a VVD member was minister of defence in 8 out of 11 cabinets. Rutte is VVD member, has been VVD list-leader, and was during 6 cabinets out of 11, PM.

Rutte was Prime Minister at the time of the downing of the MH17 and is 100% liable for information provided to Schiphol.

3c. TO BE INVESTIGATED: the procedure of becoming a NATO secretary general

  • When does a search for a new secretary general start?
  • Are eventual candidates monitored, and then invited if they are maybe interested in the job?
  • What must the skills of the new secretary general be?
  • Are there tests, exams, investigations, going deep into a candidate’s personal life, education, family, circle of friends, sexual preferences, religion, etc., similar to what candidate ambassadors or UN secretary candidates have to endure, or even worse?
Rutte‘s skills, as secretary of NATO, and shown (undeniable evidence) in videos published by NATO
  • unprecedented shamelessness and unscrupulousness via cognitive warfare
  • consciously creating mass hysteria
  • demonizing Russia
  • silencing EU’s sanctioning of Europeans (psychological terror)
  • supporting terrorism
  • supporting genocide in Gaza
  • promoting NATO war crimes and terrorism
  • protecting Ukrainian fascists and Neo Nazis
  • consciously violation / ignoring / twisting historical facts
  • bluffing
  • warmongering
  • racism
  • hate speech
  • bullying
  • limitless provoking
  • rudeness
  • brutal lying
  • cruel
  • highheartedness
  • delusions of grandeur
  • arrogance
  • absence of diplomacy
  • slander
  • humiliating
  • obstructing peace talks
  • corrupting peace talks
  • for 100% committed to the NATO goal: destroying Russia, whatever it may cost, lives do not matter
  • the goal justifies the means
  • therefore willing to spread the NATO ideology, even if it results in the end of life on earth
  • therefore willing to commit war crimes
  • therefore willing to commit crimes against humanity
  • therefore the perfect NATO secretary, and chosen: he passed all exams, and within my hypothesis about the complicit factor in the MH17 “accident”, he successfully passed the MH14 “100% committed to NATO” exam

4. THE ROLE OF KIEV, POROCHENKO AND USA

Scroll for more down to: WIKIPEDIA HAS TO BE REVIEWED AND UPDATED, 2. The Wikipedia version of the MH17 today

If Porochenko “forgot” to warn Rutte, then it is Porochenko / the USA who are the one and only culprit and fully accountable for the consequences of the failure to inform, or the intentional NOT informing, because they had, like Rutte as secretary general of NATO once in the then nearby future, a personal interest in the downing of MH17, since this “accident” incited hatred against Russia, fuelled the ignorant people’s desire for revenge, and legalized NATO expansion.

The Kiev coup regime / the collective west and mainstream media legalized the war with lies, misinformation, silencing information, Putin was demonized because a killer, NATO terrorism was upgraded to heroic deeds, and NATO expansion was made necessary via lies.

In my hypothesis the downing of the MH17 was planned, and nothing less than a conspiracy. Those who were sacrificed, passengers and crew of the MH17, are —like those who were killed in the Maidan Massacre, 5 months earlier, orchestrated and executed by pro-USA terrorists, source the scientific work of Ivan Katchanovski, free available here— martyrs, victims of western colonialism, greed and American hegemony.

5. REOPENING OF THE MH17 CASE

The latest book by Maidan Massacre expert, the scientist Ivan Katchanovski, and the book of Benoit Paré, “What I saw in Ukraine, 2015-2022 – Diary of an International Observer, are pieces of evidence that have not been discussed or mentioned in any Dutch newspaper article, NOS broadcast, Pauw, Jinek, etc..

Benoît Paré’s book starts with the Ukraine after the downing of the MH17, but it contains important information about the situation, the facts and acts we never heard via the mainstream media, and the judge in the court case not either. This book is an official report about the political facts and acts in South East Ukraine, and how the US-sponsored Ukrainian ultranationalist project provoked Moscow’s reaction. More about What I saw in Ukraine.

Of the highest importance is also the White Book On Violations Of Human Rights And the Rule of Law in Ukraine – 2013/2014, published in April 2014, by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to learn to understand the expansion of the civil war in Ukraine into a full-scale civil war, in the summer of 2014, when the MH17 was flying IN and OVER the war-zone, IN Ukraine, not in Russia. That Russia intervened in the civil war was due to the violations of human rights in Donbass, where many Russians live. In the documentary made by Anne-Laure Bonnel you can also see at 33:38 in the video a Russian humanitarian convoy with food, and other needs, for the people in Donbass.

List with evidence that there was a war in South East Ukraine already before July 17, 2014
  1. Professor Ivan Katchanovski – His scientific investigation The Russia-Ukraine War and its Origins, published in 2026, starting with the USA backed Maidan Massacre and Coup in 2014
  2. The New York Times, June 14, 2014: Separatists Down Military Transport Jet, Killing 49 in Eastern Ukraine
    • (5 weeks before the downing of the MH17)
  3. Human Rights Watch, June 30, 2014: Ukraine: Escalation Triggers Laws of War
    • (17 days before the downing of the MH17)
  4. Human Rights Watch, July 5, 2014: Ukraine: A Day in Luhansk: War’s Crimes, Horrors, and Uncertainties
    • (12 days before the downing of the MH17)
  5. Human Rights Watch, July 18, 2014: Ukraine: Letter to President Poroshenko on military operations in Luhansk and Donetsk (report)
  6. The documentary “Donbass”, made by Anne-Laure Bonnel, January 2015, showing the war situation in Donbass, that started in early 2014. In this documentary Porochenko mentions the term “war” between the separatists and the Kiev regime.
  7. The witness documentaries with interviews (2019-2024) with Ukrainians who live in the South East of Ukraine, published by Eva Karene Bartlett, show the full evidence that there was indeed a war in Donbass from February 2014.
  8. The book, written by Benoît Paré: What I saw in Ukraine, 2015-2022 – Diary of an International Observer. This book is an official report about the political facts and acts in South East Ukraine, and how the US-sponsored Ukrainian ultranationalist project provoked Moscow’s reaction.
  9. The book: Kees van der Pijl – Flight MH17, Ukraine and the new Cold War: Prism of disaster

These books, articles and videos are the evidence that lies have been told, the truth concealed, while NATO propaganda and lies are tolerated, not even discussed. Sacrificing your children to senseless violence is absurd. But tolerated. How bizarre is the time we live in now.

Note: In a video, published on April 21, 2026, the Dutch Ukraine-Russia-expert Marie-Thérèse ter Haar speaks about Rutte’s negligence to travel to Ukraine after the MH17 accident. He never went there. This fits within the hypothesis I shared above. Someone, including Rutte, who is part of the cause, according to my hypothesis, would then face the consequences of his own actions, and thus his own guilt, and so he stayed home.

6. WIKIPEDIA SPREADS MISINFORMATION, AND BLOCKS WORLD PEACE

Since the ignorant crowds use Wikipedia, I add the following about Wikipedia, and urge their editors to update the lies into evidence based science and facts. Because, as ambassador Jack Matlock says: “Western Leaders Became Ideological ‘War Criminals’ “. [But Wikipedia contributors and users do not understand who are ruling the world, and Wikipedia.]

6a. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE, WHY NOT?

  • Consensus-Based Content: The reality however is completely different from Wikipedia claims. The Wikipedia community is shaped as a pyramid, with many contributors at the base, and a powerful hierarchical system in many layers upward, with one final decisionmaker at the top who decides what is correct or not. So, though Wikipedia denies this, it IS indeed a dictatorial hierarchical system, that only SEEMS to be democratical. Contributors have all a nickname, and nobody, with some rare exceptions, knows their personal name, education, nationality. So, in case you “debate” about an issue, you do not have any idea with who you are discussing, his level of intelligence, education, etc.
  • Categories: In Wikipedia are several categories. Politics is one of these. Pages about politics are generally scam, and only those who are really informed, discover the scam, the lies, the misinformation, twisting of facts, etc. This is possible because the top of the pyramid follows the rules of the oligarchs behind the screens. Professor Ivan Katchanovski has been victim of scammers, Wikipedia contributors, who follow the mainstream media misinformation and upgrading this misinformation into facts, and, because of their power on the hierarchical vertical line to the top, they can remove scientific facts and add misinformation, even able to categorize the original text into “conspiracy theory”, and by doing so, humiliating the authentic author, the scientist. In public. There are lots of pages about people in the world, where only slander and lies is to be found. And it stays there. Not everybody has the skills to change it, or to remove it, do not know who to connect with who is able to delete the lies. Professor Ivan Katchanovski has discovered the names of the scammers and the text about subjects could be finally restored.
  • Source Citation: Wikipedia writes: “Information must be based on reputable, third-party sources (books, journals, reputable news)”. However, we know that we live in a world of lies, and that lies are the new truth. That science can be prostituted, that newspapers and other media are owned by oligarchs, who need the lies to continue their economic profit.
  • Neutrality: Though Wikipedia claims to be neutral: it is not neutral at all.

We need independent media. Independent investigative journalists. These have to be checked constantly as well. That is what I do. I have created a list with reliable sources, and this list is constantly edited.

6b. The Wikipedia MH17 data from 2014 has been completely deleted.

The flight details, as they were displayed on Wikipedia at the time, when I posted that memorial photo on Flickr (see also the information below the photo on Flickr), SO IN 2014:

On July 17, 2014, at 12:14 p.m. (CEST), the Boeing 777 departed from Schiphol Airport for a scheduled flight to Kuala Lumpur International Airport. Shortly after 2:00 p.m. (CEST), the aircraft climbed from 31,000 feet (9,450 meters) to 33,000 feet (10,060 meters) upon entering Ukrainian airspace. The airspace over Ukraine was closed up to 32,000 feet (9,750 meters) but was open above that. The aircraft disappeared from radar around 3:18 p.m. (CEST) east of the Ukrainian city of Donetsk, 50 kilometers from the Russian border. At that time, it was following a more northerly route than in the preceding days. The reason for the deviating route over the conflict zone could have been a significant storm on the originally planned route. The wreckage of the aircraft was found scattered over an area of ​​35 square kilometers. The tail lay 10 kilometers away from other wreckage, an indication that the plane disintegrated at high altitude.

Note: In 2014, there was mention of a “conflict zone” and a storm. That storm was supposedly the reason for flying higher—so not the “conflict zone“—to 33,000 feet. In today’s version, there is no longer any mention of a “conflict zone,” but rather that the Russo-Ukrainian war was ongoing around Donetsk at that time. And: it was a scheduled flight. That, too, was not mentioned in the 2014 version. The word “conflict zone” has therefore been correctly changed. Nothing is written about the storm anymore. Why not, I wonder.

6c. The Wikipedia version of the MH17 today

…contains extended text, aligned with the on false information, lies and absence of objectivity based court decision, on November 17, 2022.

MH17 map – Copyright; CC BY-SA 3.0

Wikipedia: About 90 minutes after the incident, Ukraine closed all routes in Eastern Ukrainian airspace, at all altitudes. The incident dramatically heightened fears about airliner shoot-downs, leading to some airlines announcing that they would avoid flying over the conflict zones.

Wikipedia: “Three other commercial aircraft were in the vicinity when the Malaysian airliner was shot down.” The entire Wikipedia page: here

Commercial aircraft was flying over a war zone, and Porochenko / Kiev / USA were and are accountable for keeping the Ukrainian airspace open for commercial aircraft. They knew:

1. Evidence that Porochenko did not take his responsibility / accountability
  1. The New York Times, June 14, 2014: Separatists Down Military Transport Jet, Killing 49 in Eastern Ukraine
    • (5 weeks before the downing of the MH17)
  2. Human Rights Watch, June 30, 2014: Ukraine: Escalation Triggers Laws of War
    • (17 days before the downing of the MH17)
  3. Human Rights Watch, July 5, 2014: Ukraine: A Day in Luhansk: War’s Crimes, Horrors, and Uncertainties
    • (12 days before the downing of the MH17)
  4. Human Rights Watch, July 18, 2014: Ukraine: Letter to President Poroshenko on military operations in Luhansk and Donetsk (report)
2. Additional information
  1. Ukraine: Two military jets shot down over Donetsk
    https://edition.cnn.com/2014/07/23/world/europe/ukraine-crisis
    Published: Jul 23, 2014,
    In: CNN World
  2. Ukraine: Widespread Use of Cluster Munitions
    Government Responsible for Cluster Attacks on Donetsk
    https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/10/20/ukraine-widespread-use-cluster-munitions
    Published: October 20, 2014
    By: Human Rights Watch

Excerpt from a video, published in 2014, by Global News:

6d. The Wikipedia page about the Maidan Massacre has to be completely revised

Ivan Katchanovski’s scientific work, his official independent scientific investigations forces Wikipedia to revise the entire page.

Other evidence:

6e. The Wikipedia page about Ukraine must be completely revised

Because of all new and older information and evidence, like Gallup maps about Ukraine 2012 and 2014, containing also tables, graphics, and also the White Book On Violations Of Human Rights And the Rule of Law in Ukraine, published in April 2014, by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, plus all investigative journalism provided by Voltairenet in hundreds of articles, of which one is exceptional: CIA: Undermining and Nazifying Ukraine Since 1953, plus all evidence that has been published by both Ivan Katchanovski and Benoît Paré, the Wikipedia page as it is available is just bias. Independent in-depth experts, investigative journalists, political scientists Ivan Katchanovski and professor Glenn Diesen should be invited to write the Wikipedia page. There are no experts in the Wikipedia community who have the necessary 100% knowledge about all the complex details, and how these are intertwined.

7. CONSORTIUM NEWS

Consortium News is an investigative online news magazine, that was founded in 1995, by Robert Parry.

8. KEES VAN DER PIJL’S SCHOLARLY WORK

Playlist MH17

“Flight MH17, Ukraine and the new Cold War: Prism of disaster“
Author: Kees van der Pijl
Publisher ‏: ‎ Manchester University Press
Publication date : ‎ July 11, 2018
Edition : ‎ 1st
Language: ‎ English
Print length: ‎ 208 pages
ISBN-10: ‎ 1526131099
ISBN-13: ‎ 978-1526131096

This is the first scholarly work on the Ukrainian unrest (today, May 2026, proven to be a war, by professor Ivan Katchanovski, admin.) and the tragic downing of MH17. It offers an analysis that challenges the Western consensus surrounding these events, emphasising the geopolitical and economic context of the West’s standoff with Russia, the BRICS bloc, and the struggles over the EU’s energy supply.
Based on previously unpublished government and NATO documents as well as a wide array of sources this book offers an analysis of global political economy and contemporary debates about Russia and East-West relations.

FOOTNOTES

  1. Speech Jeffrey D. Sachs in the European Parliament, February 19, 2025 ↩︎
  2. Groningen, the Netherlands, gas exploitation, earthquakes, absence of financial support, ruined people: only fake promises. The scandal was and is never solved, and he is not ashamed, smiles when answering questions. ↩︎
  3. The Dutch tax office scandal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_childcare_benefits_scandal ↩︎

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑