Edited: October 31, 2025 (Instagram info was added)
This blog post concerns a video in which Dr. Tögel1 explains how mainstream media is used for propaganda and cognitive warfare2. He goes into great detail about what is being said, what is being claimed, and what is true or false. The video concerns the German ZDF broadcast, published on October 23rd, titled “Markus Lanz.”3 Markus Lanz4 moderates the interview with guests: Georg Mascolo5, Katja Kloger6, and Andrey Gurkov7.
Dr. Jonas Tögel:
When I watched the “Markus Lanz” program from October 23, 2025, and analyzed it for war propaganda, I was immediately struck by how one-sided the choice of guests was: Both Katja Gloger and her husband, Georg Mascolo, are members of the “Atlantikbrücke” – a transatlantic think tank that receives funding from, among others, banks and the German Foreign Office. Unfortunately, Markus Lanz did not introduce either of them as transatlantic lobbyists. The selection of guests thus plays a significant role: I myself have experienced firsthand that one is not invited to talk shows if one does not represent the desired positions. Source Instagram
The “Markus Lanz” show from October 23rd is a good example of how the same issues can be presented very differently: In the program, it’s perfectly acceptable to discuss state terrorism: terrorist attacks are carried out by one’s own intelligence services, for which an enemy is blamed, against whom war can now be waged under the pretext of “terrorism.” When it comes to the 1999 terrorist attacks in Moscow and the Russian KGB/FSB is the possible perpetrator, such considerations are not only permissible but even probable. However, when it comes to September 11, 2001, and American intelligence services as possible perpetrators, such considerations are not allowed and are dismissed as “conspiracy theories.” I find that astonishing. Source Instagram
Because the mainstreampropaganda system, explained in detail in this video, is not only used in Germany, the video is published here, so that we all can learn how the crowds are mislead, brainwashed. The video is subtitled. Choose your language in the menu bar. The menu bar becomes visible after you have clicked the red YT start button.
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists – Georg Mascolo – https://www.icij.org/journalists/georg-mascolo “Georg Mascolo, Germany, is a bestselling author and journalist who worked for nearly 25 years for the Spiegel Group. From 2008 until 2013, he was editor-in-chief of Spiegel magazine. From 2014 until 2022, he was the head of the Joint Investigative Group of Süddeutsche Zeitung and the two German public broadcasters WDR and NDR. Mascolo has been an ICIJ member since 1998. He has been the dean of the Bucerius Summer School on Global Governance since 2017. In 2014, he was named Political Journalist of the Year by the influential professional journal Medium Magazin.”↩︎
Journalismusfest Innsbruck – Katja Gloger – https://www.journalismusfest.org/en/katja-gloger-2 “Katja Gloger studied Eastern European history, Political science and Slavic studies in Hamburg and Moscow. After graduating from the German School of Journalism in Munich, she became a TV-reporter for WDR Radio and Television in Cologne. From 1989 on she was based as correspondent for the weekly Stern in Moscow.. Gloger interviewed Mikhail Gorbachev, Boris Yeltsin and Vladimir Putin, whom she accompanied for months as the first Western correspondent. She later headed the foreign desk of Stern and was posted as senior political correspondent to Washington, D.C. Honored with the Henri-Nannen-Award and named political “Journalist of the Year” she now works as a freelance journalist and book author focusing on Russia and Security Policy. Her books include Putin’s World: The New Russia, Ukraine and the West; Stranger Friends: Germans and Russians. The Story of a Fateful Relationship and the bestseller Outbreak: Insights into a Pandemic. She is a regular guest on German radio and television, panelist and moderator of discussions on Russia and international affairs. In her honorary capacity, she is Spokesperson and Executive Member of the Board of RSF Reporters without Borders, Germany. She lives in Berlin.”↩︎
Lecture (2023) by Dr. Jonas Tögel, published on September 10, 2025 (subtitled)
Dr. Jonas Tögel is a German psychologist, American studies scholar, propaganda researcher, and bestselling author. He works as a research associate at the Institute of Psychology at the University of Regensburg. His motivation is to help people recognize, understand, and neutralize manipulation in everyday life and propaganda. In doing so, he is committed to strengthening his audience’s resilience so that one can remain peaceful, positive, and able to act even in difficult times. Website: Dr. Jonas Tögel
“When I gave my lecture on NATO’s cognitive warfare in spring 2023, it was not foreseeable how much the threat of war in Europe would increase. Today it is clear that cognitive warfare has divided populations, weakened the peace movement, and that it is therefore possible to continue to push forward with rearmament and a new, major war in Europe. What is needed now is an understanding of the mechanisms of war propaganda and a determined, shared, and loud desire for peace.” – Dr. Jonas Tögel
Quote: “[…..] we first discuss how to define “misinformation”, and how it relates to various other commonly used terms such as “disinformation” and “fake news”. Next, we examine the psychology of correcting misinformation: what happens when someone is exposed to a fact check, and what are the benefits and drawbacks of correcting misinformation once the damage is already done? Finally, we discuss how to build psychological resilience against misinformation through psychological “vaccines” or “inoculation”: we look at the theoretical background of inoculation theory (dating back to the 1960s), its modern application within the context of online misinformation (in online games and educational videos), and future prospects and research avenues in the field.“
Attention: Both authors are professors at the university of Cambridge: check Jon Roozenbeek and Sander van der Linden. The biography on their Cambridge profile doesn’t mention any collaboration with NATO or writing for NATO. There’s no link to the NATO document “Inoculation Theory and Misinformation”. Why not? There must be a reason. There’s no link to their Cambridge profile on the NATO profile. Check: Jon Roozenbeek and Sander van der Linden. Why not? Conclusion: That, which cannot stand the light of day, is being concealed. Both professors have prostituted their knowledge regarding the possibility of brain manipulation, and NATO is the pimp.
In case the page will be removed from the NATO website, and all denied, today, October 11, 2025 this PDF has been created. The from the NATO website downloaded file: PDF
Screenshot taken October 11, 2025, from the NATO website.
The original post, published April 28, 2023, was titled: “MH17”, and, has been ENTIRELY changed on May 6, 2026, because of the recently published scientific book: The Russia-Ukraine War and its Origins (professor Ivan Katchanovski), and another book: What I saw in Ukraine (Benoît Paré, international observer), but also because the two links to Bellingcat had become meaningless: in 2023, when I published the original post, both links were directing to a Bellingcat web-page with a picture of a BUK, Russian made, in 2008, in Ukraine. The articles were still there, but the pictures of the BUK, with the text that included the year 2008, and that it were Russian BUKs, are gone.
B.INDEX
1. New Evidence
THOUGH DENIED IN THE FINAL CONCLUSION OF THE COURT CASE IN 2022, THERE WAS INDEED A WAR ONGOING IN UKRAINE IN JULY 2014, WHEN THE MH17 FLEW OVER UKRAINE
2. Responsibility and accountability
Unanswered questions, ignored questions, not asked questions that have to be answered, because possible to answer today via the new evidence about the real culprit. The real culprit is the west. Not Moscow.
3. To be investigated: the role of Rutte
3a. Rutte today, as NATO secretary general. His warmongering, undiplomatic, provocative behaviour
3b. TO BE INVESTIGATED: Rutte’s role in the MH17 story
3c. TO BE INVESTIGATED: the procedure of becoming a NATO secretary general
4. The role of Kiev, Porochenko and USA
Accountable for the downing of the MH17. Porochenko, and therefore USA as well, since Porochenko was a western marionette, knew, was informed, and silenced what he knew. He has committed perjury.
5. Re-opening the MH17 case
The books of Ivan Katchanovski, Benoît Paré, and the White Book, published by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation in March 2014, plus the NYT article, published on June 14, 2014, and the in 1 mentioned Human Rights Watch articles, plus the documentary about Donbass, are crucial to create an exact view on the real political situation in Ukraine, to be able to find the real culprit, within the downing of the MH17.
The books did not exist yet on November 17, 2022 (court decision).
The NYT article however did indeed exist, but was “overlooked”(?), together with the Human Rights Watch letter and articles, plus The White Book, a report of violations of human rights in Ukraine from November 2013 till March 2014, published by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. This study was not taken into account, which proves that the Judges in the court case were not objective, but committed to the NATO / Pentagon, Washington scenario.
All this together shows that the court case end result was a scam, therefore illegal, and has to be re-opened, to start from scratch.
6. Wikipedia spreads misinformation and blocks world peace.
6a. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE, WHY NOT?
6b. The Wikipedia MH17 data from 2014 has been completely deleted.
6c. The Wikipedia version of the MH17 today
6d. The Wikipedia page about the Maidan Massacre has to be completely revised
6e. The Wikipedia page about Ukraine must be completely revised
7. Consortium news
Hundred articles (with comments) about the downing of MH17, by independent investigative journalists
8. Kees van der Pijl’s scholarly work on the downing of the MH17, amidst the Ukrainian war
This is the first scholarly work on the Ukrainian unrest (today, May 2026, proven to be a war, by professor Ivan Katchanovski, admin.) and the tragic downing of MH17. It offers an analysis that challenges the Western consensus surrounding these events, emphasising the geopolitical and economic context of the West’s standoff with Russia, the BRICS bloc, and the struggles over the EU’s energy supply. Based on previously unpublished government and NATO documents as well as a wide array of sources this book offers an analysis of global political economy and contemporary debates about Russia and East-West relations.
1. NEW EVIDENCE – THE CIVIL WAR STARTED IN EARLY 2014, AND ESCALATED BEFORE JULY 2014
THOUGH DENIED IN THE FINAL CONCLUSION OF THE COURT CASE IN 2022, THERE WAS INDEED A WAR ONGOING IN UKRAINE IN JULY 2014, WHEN THE MH17 FLEW OVER UKRAINE
The October 2025 published book: “The Russia-Ukraine War and its Origins“, written by professor Ivan Katchanovski, offers the evidence that in early 2014 a by the USA well-prepared civil war started in Ukraine, as part of the total war somewhere in the future, with Russia. All started in Kiev, with the Maidan Massacre [17 February 2014], the killing of hundred innocent people, by pro-USA forces. This has been in-depth investigated by professor Ivan Katchanovsky, and been exposed via his analyses of many videos that have also been used also as evidence during a trial. Also the court sessions have been filmed, and are published on professor Katchanovsky’s YouTube channel. The Maidan Massacre was the intro to the also by the USA well-prepared and backed coup, that took place in Kiev, on February 21, 2014. [Watch: discussion about the book.]
This book creates therefore also the immediate necessity of a re-opening of the MH17 case: because on July 17, 2014, there was a war in South East Ukraine, between separatists in Donbass (the MH17 was flying over Donbass/ Donetsk, so over a war zone in Ukraine) and the USA/Kiev regime, under the full control of Washington, in which many thousands1 of Ukrainians were killed in the South East, by Kiev.
Donbass, a documentary, made by Anne Laure Bonnel, after she travelled to Donbass on January 15, 2015, to film the unbelievable. The documentary was published on her YouTube channel in 2022.
Porochenkoin 2014: “We will have benefits for pensioners and children, they will not! Our children will go to school and kindergarden, their children will stay in the cellars! Because they can’t do anything. And that’s how, precisely that, we will win this war.”
WAR Mind the word “war“, because this is a rejected detail in the MH17 court case, and reason why the final court decision plead “guilty” into the direction of Russia. Benoît Paré shows in his book ( a diary), published in 2025, how the US-sponsored Ukrainian ultranationalist project provoked Moscow’s reaction. This is also a missing detail in the final court case decision. Reason why the court case has to be re-opened.
This website explains on November 15, 2014, that Poroshenko’s words have been taken out of the true context. However: the new scientific evidence of the reality in Ukraine came not earlier than 2025, via professor Ivan Katchanovski, and Benoît Paré. The study from March 2014 provided by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation in “White Book“, is not accepted as reliable (because Russian originated), while it has to be part of an independent investigation, independent media, and court cases (Lady Justice is independent).
Other reliable sources have simply been ignored, like the info provided by Human-Rights Watch, the info provided by Consortium News, the New York Times, and Voltaire Net. Taking this new, plus older but ignored, evidence into account here, the words Porochenko spoke, have to be understood exactly for what they are: western propaganda, pro NATO, pro USA, and anti-Russia.
The documentary “Donbass”, made by Anne-Laure Bonnel, January 2015, showing the war situation in Donbass, that started in early 2014. In this documentary Porochenko mentions the term “war” between the separatists and the Kiev regime.
The witness documentaries with interviews, made by Eva Karene Bartlett
Jens Stoltenberg: NATO Expansion Was Key to Russian Invasion of Ukraine
Additional, aligned with Benoît Paré’s diary: Jens Stoltenberg, the Norwegian secretary general of NATO from 2014 to 2024, admits NATO Expansion Was Key to Russian Invasion of Ukraine: In this video Stoltenberg confesses:
“Then Putin declared in the autumn of 2021 and he actually sent a draft treaty that he wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement. That is what he sent us. That was a precondition for not to invade Ukraine. Of course we didn’t sign that. The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign a promise never to enlarge NATO. He wanted us to remove military infrastructure in all allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe. We should remove NATO from that part of our alliance. Introducing some kind of A and B, a second class membership. We rejected that. So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO close to his borders. He has got exact the opposite. He has got more NATO presence in the Eastern part of the alliance.” Source: X, Source: Jeffrey D. Sachs, Source: YouTube. More about Ukraine and NATO: https://backups.blog/2024/04/09/ukraine-and-nato/
Additional: Secretary of NATO from 2009-2014 the Danish Anders Fogh Rasmussen, is still a NATO lobbyist. He wrote the book: The Will to Lead: America’s Indispensable Role in the Global Fight for Freedom. The title is a scam, glorifying a CIA ruled, economic fascist regime [Economic Fascism][CIA: Undermining and Nazifying Ukraine Since 1953]. “The will to lead” is based on white supremacism, racism, modern colonialism, and derived from the ideological dreaming (phantasy), that USA has to be the hegemon [The US motivation is to be number one, (bottom page 5)]. The US does not fight for freedom, it follows a typically American crooks system: regime change everywhere possible in the world via a coup, followed by theft, exploitation of all what is below the surface of the soil of a country, like oil and rare minerals, and when all is taken, leaving the country ruined behind, and in extreme poverty. This is proven via statements, from former ambassadors, witnesses, colonels, CIA analysts, history writers, etc. to be found in this list: Political Analysts / Experts. Anders Fogh Rasmussen is therefore legalizing, even promoting the war in Ukraine, guilty of demonizing Russia, supporting a war-criminal regime in Washington and complicit, together with Stoltenberg and Rutte, in the elimination of young Ukrainians, who were and still are pushed (arrested on the streets and transported) to fight in a completely meaningless NATO war that could have been avoided, following logic, and diplomacy, in a very simple way. On NATO’s banner is written: “Provoke! Fight! Die! For us, NATO!” The USA is practicing pathological political meddling world wide, with the mask of the Good Guy, while being the aggressor, the human rights violator even in its own USA, and committing war crimes.
The MH17 was flying over a war-zone, on July 17, 2014. Entire Ukraine was a war zone since February 2014, and reason why in the meantime passenger flights from London and Paris were avoiding the Ukrainian airspace.
Excerpt from a video, published in 2014, by Global News:
Missiles were crossing the skies above Ukraine, and yes, Kiev-Ukraine had its own anti-aircraft warfare, also buks, which were all made in Russia in that time. The in general Russian population in the south-east received support from Russia. The rest of Ukraine received support from the collective west. The NATO goal, and cause of the Russia-Ukraine war, the NATO membership of Ukraine, became official in 2008, but was already planned in 2002. The NATO membership was not the wish of the Ukrainian people:
On April 5, 2024, Professor Glenn Diesen shared on X: The polling reveals NATO membership was deeply unpopular among Ukrainians even AFTER Russia took back Crimea: – Between 1991 and 2014 (before the coup), all polls revealed only 20% of Ukrainians wanted to join NATO, despite fierce efforts by the US.
Question 1: Why did the new, pro-American Ukrainian government at the time, in 2014, not warn the Netherlands—a befriended nation, therefore, because it is pro-American—of the extreme danger concerning flying over a war zone, Donetsk/Donbass?
Question 2: Who is/are primarily liable for the downing of MH17? Apparently—and one can state that this is highly remarkable or dangerously negligent—no briefing took place from Ukraine to the countries outside, the EU, and thus not with the Netherlands either; otherwise, this disaster would never have occurred. One may assume with certainty that the danger of an airplane crash in Kyiv was known, especially since the country was—and is—informed, supported, and coached by the USA. The USA has control over everything; it has informants and supervisors. The CIA. It is therefore evident that the Ukrainian government was fully aware of the war in Donetsk and of real and life-threatening dangers concerning air traffic in the airspace above Donetsk.
Question 3: When will people in Europe, in the Netherlands, become aware of the liability, of the unforgivable negligence of Ukraine and the USA in this matter?
Question 4: Is the withholding of information, the failure to issue warnings, resulting in such a disaster, to be charged as WAR CRIME, in this case committed by the USA and Ukraine?
3. TO BE INVESTIGATED: THE ROLE OF RUTTE
3a. Rutte today, as NATO secretary general.
Rutte is excessively active in spreading NATO war-propaganda, uses extremely provocative, rude, humiliating rhetoric, filled with delusional grandeur, misinformation and pathological lies. Unfortunately the one despicable video has been withdrawn from YouTube, recently published, the one in which Rutte requests parents to sacrifice their sons and daughters to the NATO war against Russia, while demonizing Putin, who has factually not asked anything else than a neutral Ukraine, and the end of NATO expansion, in order to protect his own people against NATO expansion and NATO aggression. Related with this subject are “NATO’s Cognitive Warfare“, and “State Terrorism and Cognitive Warfare – Understanding Propaganda“. About NATO expansion: click start; 2 minutes watch time…..
NATO expansion animation film, with updates till 2022. Finland and Sweden followed quickly later.
3b. TO BE INVESTIGATED: Rutte’s role in the MH17 story, his absent information to Schiphol and Malaysia that Ukraine’s airspace should be avoided: and THUS
1. his possible, even conscious choice in 2014, NOT to warn Schiphol in order to demonstrate to NATO that he is willing to do anything [the goal justifies the means] to become NATO Secretary General
2. and thus meet the conditions to pass the screening regarding 100% loyalty to NATO interests
3. and thus war industry interests, and to demonstrate cooperation with NATO objectives—in this case the downfall of Russia, the end of Russia—and create anti-Russia sentiment in the Netherlands and elsewhere in the world,
4. and THUS even willingsacrifice innocent civilians, in order to turn the anti-Russia sentiment into deep-black hatred, disgust, and to make the Dutch willing to sacrifice their children and grandchildren to a war that could have been prevented if the truth had come to light, but which is heavily censored.
Excerpt from a video, published in 2014, by Global News:
Note: The by the USA orchestrated and well prepared Maidan Massacre was a similar sacrifice of innocent people [shown by professor Ivan Katchanovski in his scientific work The Russia-Ukraine War and its Origins] to realize the political goal: an overthrow of the pro-Russia government in Kiev, via a coup, that was following some days later. My hypothesis: The sacrifice of the passengers and crew of the MH17 was used by USA/NATO to create deep-felt Russia hatred, and legalize a war against Russia, to create pro-USA sentiment, and to create anti-Russia sentiment.
Rutte, who has shown during his 4 cabinets, daring to behave inhumane 2,3, has not shown a single sign of compassion, ever, is granite-hard, and is now the VVD [Dutch right wing political party] “whisperer”. During the latest decennia a VVD member was minister of defence in 8 out of 11 cabinets. Rutte is VVD member, has been VVD list-leader, and was during 6 cabinets out of 11, PM.
Rutte was Prime Minister at the time of the downing of the MH17 and is 100% liable for information provided to Schiphol.
3c. TO BE INVESTIGATED: the procedure of becoming a NATO secretary general
When does a search for a new secretary general start?
Are eventual candidates monitored, and then invited if they are maybe interested in the job?
What must the skills of the new secretary general be?
Are there tests, exams, investigations, going deep into a candidate’s personal life, education, family, circle of friends, sexual preferences, religion, etc., similar to what candidate ambassadors or UN secretary candidates have to endure, or even worse?
Rutte‘s skills, as secretary of NATO, and shown (undeniable evidence) in videos published by NATO
unprecedented shamelessness and unscrupulousness via cognitive warfare
consciously creating mass hysteria
demonizing Russia
silencing EU’s sanctioning of Europeans (psychological terror)
for 100% committed to the NATO goal: destroying Russia, whatever it may cost, lives do not matter
the goal justifies the means
therefore willing to spread the NATO ideology, even if it results in the end of life on earth
therefore willing to commit war crimes
therefore willing to commit crimes against humanity
therefore the perfect NATO secretary, and chosen: he passed all exams, and within my hypothesis about the complicit factor in the MH17 “accident”, he successfully passed the MH14 “100% committed to NATO” exam
4. THE ROLE OF KIEV, POROCHENKO AND USA
Scroll for more down to: WIKIPEDIA HAS TO BE REVIEWED AND UPDATED, 2. The Wikipedia version of the MH17 today
If Porochenko “forgot” to warn Rutte, then it is Porochenko / the USA who are the one and only culprit and fully accountable for the consequences of the failure to inform, or the intentional NOT informing, because they had, like Rutte as secretary general of NATO once in the then nearby future, a personal interest in the downing of MH17, since this “accident” incited hatred against Russia, fuelled the ignorant people’s desire for revenge, and legalized NATO expansion.
The Kiev coup regime / the collective west and mainstream media legalized the war with lies, misinformation, silencing information, Putin was demonized because a killer, NATO terrorism was upgraded to heroic deeds, and NATO expansion was made necessary via lies.
In my hypothesis the downing of the MH17 was planned, and nothing less than a conspiracy. Those who were sacrificed, passengers and crew of the MH17, are —like those who were killed in the Maidan Massacre, 5 months earlier, orchestrated and executed by pro-USA terrorists, source the scientific work of Ivan Katchanovski, free available here— martyrs, victims of western colonialism, greedand American hegemony.
The latest book by Maidan Massacre expert, the scientist Ivan Katchanovski, and the book of Benoit Paré, “What I saw in Ukraine, 2015-2022 – Diary of an International Observer, are pieces of evidence that have not been discussed or mentioned in any Dutch newspaper article, NOS broadcast, Pauw, Jinek, etc..
Benoît Paré’s book starts with the Ukraine after the downing of the MH17, but it contains important information about the situation, the facts and acts we never heard via the mainstream media, and the judge in the court case not either. This book is an official report about the political facts and acts in South East Ukraine, and how the US-sponsored Ukrainian ultranationalist project provoked Moscow’s reaction. More about What I saw in Ukraine.
Of the highest importance is also the White Book On Violations Of Human Rights And the Rule of Law in Ukraine – 2013/2014, published in April 2014, by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to learn to understand the expansion of the civil war in Ukraine into a full-scale civil war, in the summer of 2014, when the MH17 was flying IN and OVER the war-zone, IN Ukraine, not in Russia. That Russia intervened in the civil war was due to the violations of human rights in Donbass, where many Russians live. In the documentary made by Anne-Laure Bonnel you can also see at 33:38 in the video a Russian humanitarian convoy with food, and other needs, for the people in Donbass.
List with evidence that there was a war in South East Ukrainealready before July 17, 2014
Professor Ivan Katchanovski – His scientific investigation The Russia-Ukraine War and its Origins, published in 2026, starting with the USA backed Maidan Massacre and Coup in 2014
The documentary “Donbass”, made by Anne-Laure Bonnel, January 2015, showing the war situation in Donbass, that started in early 2014. In this documentary Porochenko mentions the term “war” between the separatists and the Kiev regime.
The book, written by Benoît Paré: What I saw in Ukraine, 2015-2022 – Diary of an International Observer. This book is an official report about the political facts and acts in South East Ukraine, and how the US-sponsored Ukrainian ultranationalist project provoked Moscow’s reaction.
These books, articles and videos are the evidence that lies have been told, the truth concealed, while NATO propaganda and lies are tolerated, not even discussed. Sacrificing your children to senseless violence is absurd. But tolerated. How bizarre is the time we live in now.
Note: In a video, published on April 21, 2026, the Dutch Ukraine-Russia-expert Marie-Thérèse ter Haar speaks about Rutte’s negligence to travel to Ukraine after the MH17 accident. He never went there. This fits within the hypothesis I shared above. Someone, including Rutte, who is part of the cause, according to my hypothesis, would then face the consequences of his own actions, and thus his own guilt, and so he stayed home.
6. WIKIPEDIA SPREADS MISINFORMATION, AND BLOCKS WORLD PEACE
Since the ignorant crowds use Wikipedia, I add the following about Wikipedia, and urge their editors to update the lies into evidence based science and facts.Because, as ambassador Jack Matlock says: “Western Leaders Became Ideological ‘War Criminals’ “.[But Wikipedia contributors and users do not understand who are ruling the world, and Wikipedia.]
6a.WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE, WHY NOT?
Consensus-Based Content: The reality however is completely different from Wikipedia claims. The Wikipedia community is shaped as a pyramid, with many contributors at the base, and a powerful hierarchical system in many layers upward, with one final decisionmaker at the top who decides what is correct or not. So, though Wikipedia denies this, it IS indeed a dictatorial hierarchical system, that only SEEMS to be democratical. Contributors have all a nickname, and nobody, with some rare exceptions, knows their personal name, education, nationality. So, in case you “debate” about an issue, you do not have any idea with who you are discussing, his level of intelligence, education, etc.
Categories: In Wikipedia are several categories. Politics is one of these. Pages about politics are generally scam, and only those who are really informed, discover the scam, the lies, the misinformation, twisting of facts, etc. This is possible because the top of the pyramid follows the rules of the oligarchs behind the screens. Professor Ivan Katchanovski has been victim of scammers, Wikipedia contributors, who follow the mainstream media misinformation and upgrading this misinformation into facts, and, because of their power on the hierarchical vertical line to the top, they can remove scientific facts and add misinformation, even able to categorize the original text into “conspiracy theory”, and by doing so, humiliating the authentic author, the scientist. In public. There are lots of pages about people in the world, where only slander and lies is to be found. And it stays there. Not everybody has the skills to change it, or to remove it, do not know who to connect with who is able to delete the lies. Professor Ivan Katchanovski has discovered the names of the scammers and the text about subjects could be finally restored.
Source Citation: Wikipedia writes: “Information must be based on reputable, third-party sources (books, journals, reputable news)”. However, we know that we live in a world of lies, and that lies are the new truth. That science can be prostituted, that newspapers and other media are owned by oligarchs, who need the lies to continue their economic profit.
Neutrality: Though Wikipedia claims to be neutral: it is not neutral at all.
We need independent media. Independent investigative journalists. These have to be checked constantly as well. That is what I do. I have created a list with reliable sources, and this list is constantly edited.
6b. The Wikipedia MH17 data from 2014 has been completely deleted.
The flight details, as they were displayed on Wikipedia at the time, when I posted that memorial photo on Flickr (see also the information below the photo on Flickr), SO IN 2014:
On July 17, 2014, at 12:14 p.m. (CEST), the Boeing 777 departed from Schiphol Airport for a scheduled flight to Kuala Lumpur International Airport. Shortly after 2:00 p.m. (CEST), the aircraft climbed from 31,000 feet (9,450 meters) to 33,000 feet (10,060 meters) upon entering Ukrainian airspace. The airspace over Ukraine was closed up to 32,000 feet (9,750 meters) but was open above that. The aircraft disappeared from radar around 3:18 p.m. (CEST) east of the Ukrainian city of Donetsk, 50 kilometers from the Russian border. At that time, it was following a more northerly route than in the preceding days. The reason for the deviating route over the conflict zone could have been a significant storm on the originally planned route. The wreckage of the aircraft was found scattered over an area of 35 square kilometers. The tail lay 10 kilometers away from other wreckage, an indication that the plane disintegrated at high altitude.
Note: In 2014, there was mention of a “conflict zone” and a storm. That storm was supposedly the reason for flying higher—so not the “conflict zone“—to 33,000 feet. In today’s version, there is no longer any mention of a “conflict zone,” but rather that the Russo-Ukrainian war was ongoing around Donetsk at that time. And: it was a scheduled flight. That, too, was not mentioned in the 2014 version. The word “conflict zone” has therefore been correctly changed. Nothing is written about the storm anymore. Why not, I wonder.
6c. The Wikipedia version of the MH17 today
…contains extended text, aligned with the on false information, lies and absence of objectivity based court decision, on November 17, 2022.
Wikipedia: About 90 minutes after the incident, Ukraine closed all routes in Eastern Ukrainian airspace, at all altitudes. The incident dramatically heightened fears about airliner shoot-downs, leading to some airlines announcing that they would avoid flying over the conflict zones.
Wikipedia: “Three other commercial aircraft were in the vicinity when the Malaysian airliner was shot down.” The entire Wikipedia page: here
Commercial aircraft was flying over a war zone, and Porochenko / Kiev / USA were and are accountable for keeping the Ukrainian airspace open for commercial aircraft. They knew:
1. Evidence that Porochenko did not take his responsibility / accountability
6e. The Wikipedia page about Ukraine must be completely revised
Because of all new and older information and evidence, like Gallup maps about Ukraine 2012 and 2014, containing also tables, graphics, and also the White Book On Violations Of Human Rights And the Rule of Law in Ukraine, published in April 2014, by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, plus all investigative journalism provided by Voltairenet in hundreds of articles, of which one is exceptional: CIA: Undermining and Nazifying Ukraine Since 1953, plus all evidence that has been published by both Ivan Katchanovski and Benoît Paré, the Wikipedia page as it is available is just bias. Independent in-depth experts, investigative journalists, political scientists Ivan Katchanovski and professor Glenn Diesen should be invited to write the Wikipedia page. There are no experts in the Wikipedia community who have the necessary 100% knowledge about all the complex details, and how these are intertwined.
7. CONSORTIUM NEWS
Consortium News is an investigative online news magazine, that was founded in 1995, by Robert Parry.
This is the first scholarly work on the Ukrainian unrest (today, May 2026, proven to be a war, by professor Ivan Katchanovski, admin.) and the tragic downing of MH17. It offers an analysis that challenges the Western consensus surrounding these events, emphasising the geopolitical and economic context of the West’s standoff with Russia, the BRICS bloc, and the struggles over the EU’s energy supply. Based on previously unpublished government and NATO documents as well as a wide array of sources this book offers an analysis of global political economy and contemporary debates about Russia and East-West relations.
Groningen, the Netherlands, gas exploitation, earthquakes, absence of financial support, ruined people: only fake promises. The scandal was and is never solved, and he is not ashamed, smiles when answering questions. ↩︎
