Related: The book: “What I Saw In Ukraine – 2015-2022 – Diary of an International Observer” written by Benoît Paré. From 2015 to 2022, he worked as an unarmed civilian observer for the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission (SMM) in the Donbas, making him one of the very few Western observers deployed for extended periods on both sides of the contact line. Due to what he perceived as a systematic pro-Ukrainian bias of the mission, he eventually resigned. Read the full text here and watch the on YouTube published discussions and interview with Benoît Paré, collected in this playlist
[2020] текст песни / Testo / Lyrics / Paroles / Sanat : Vladimir Leonidovič Skobtsov [Владимир Леонидович Скобцов]1,2
музыка / Musica / Music / Musique / Sävel: Mixail Xoxlov [Михаил Хохлов]
в исполнении / Interpreti / Performed by / Interprétée par / Laulavat: Natal’ja Kačura [Наталья Качура], Margarita Lisovina [Маргарита Лисовина]
Continue reading below the video
Note: The hidden message in the video, the two men and their relationship with each other, is not clear for not insiders. There is no explanation in the video information about it. In case you know, do not hesitate and contact “Sustainable Politics” (search in the info part of the website, below the post)
YouTube video information, machine–translated
“Donbass is ours.”
Music by M. Khokhlov, lyrics by V. Skobtsov. Performed by soloists of the Donetsk State Academic Musical and Drama Theater named after M. Brovun – Natalia Kachura and Margarita Lisovina.
The theater’s actors Ivan Bessmoly, Pavel Bodrov, and Elena Lesogorova also took part in the filming of the video.
Cameramen: I. Kuzemko, R. Novikov Producers: A. Bernatovich, V. Levchuk General Producer: S. Pelyanicin
The First Republican Channel of the DPR expresses gratitude for their assistance in the production of the video to the DPR National Migration Service, the DPR Ministry of Information, the DPR Ministry of Culture, and the Donetsk Republican Museum of Local History.
The following text is a machine translation of an in the Italian language written explanation of the reason why this song is added to the website “Anti War Songs“, written by Riccardo Gullotta. The Admin of “Sustainable Politics” has added essential notes where needed, because the text is not entirely aligned with what we have learned to know in the meantime as absolute facts. The following text was published in or earlier than 2022. The exact date is not given, but since is ment
Origins of the song
The song was performed for the first time in Donetsk in September 2020 to celebrate the liberation of Donbass from Nazi troops in September 1943 after the bloody Battle of Saur-Mogila [Ukrainian: Савур-могила, Russian: Саур-Могила].
Admin: |[Wikipedia – English: Savur-Mohyla, Russian: Саур-Могила, Ukrainian: Савур-могила. ATTENTION: an authentic Ukrainian Wikipedia page concerning this subject, does not exist. It is a UK Wikipedia page, as you can see in the URL of that page on Wikipedia. It is a fact that Wikipedia is not per se correct, truthful, in its category politics. UK is severe anti-Russian and guilty of unprecedented western collective = NATO propaganda. The content of the by UK published text can be mixed with misinformation, and it is important to read it with caution. Rus Data: Мемориальный комплекс «Саур-Могила».
In 2014, the same location was the scene of fierce fighting between the Ukrainians of the 25th Airborne Brigade and the separatists of the self-proclaimed Republic of Donbass. The hill changed hands eight times in a month, until the Donbass separatists finally took control of it on August 26, 2014. The song quickly gained great popularity and is considered the iconic song of Donbass.
Opinions
In the exacerbated climate of an eight-year war, dating back to 2014,
Admin: This is an indication that the article was written in 2022.
it’s understandable how, judging by the ratings, the citizens of Donetsk have overwhelmingly identified with the words of the author, the poet Skobtsov, a native of the region. In short, it’s a patriotic song we intend to keep our distance from, as we would with any artistic expression that gives too much prominence to flags and diversity in an exclusive manner. In this case, we are urged to go further and express our clear dissent. We absolutely dislike its use for propaganda (unless, perhaps, it was even commissioned). However, the other side isn’t joking when it comes to propaganda. They are certainly more sophisticated and more abreast of the techniques and strategies of mass communication.
Moreover, since this is the side under attack, certain “approximations” are overlooked, especially since raising a few timid objections would make one look like a foolish servant of the tyrants of the day. Note the titanic bronzes in the clip, symbols of warrior virtue, a perennial warning to any reckless pacifists; the thug in camouflage, with his steel jaw and lectorial-style chest plates. The recurring phrase “Donbass / Russia / Moscow is with us, and so is God” is to be dismissed with disdain.
Admin: |[The video, the song and the lyrics can only then be understood, if one is up to date about what really happened in Ukraine, and therefore it is a must to read: What I Saw In Ukraine – 2015-2022 – Diary of an International Observer written by Benoît Paré. From 2015 to 2022, he worked as an unarmed civilian observer for the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission (SMM) in the Donbas, making him one of the very few Western observers deployed for extended periods on both sides of the contact line. Due to what he perceived as a systematic pro-Ukrainian bias of the mission, he eventually resigned. Read the full text here and watch the on YouTube published discussions and interview with Benoît Paré, collected in this playlist.]|
Aside from the resonance of the terrible “Gott mit uns” (God with us) that evokes the Teutonic Knights and the Nazi paraphernalia of the Third Reich, we are fed up with anyone’s enlistment of God. For everyone, it is an infamy that clashes with common sense, a charade intended to brainwash the masses; for believers who have not given up on reflection (thus excluding fundamentalists), it is absolute blasphemy in many respects.
Admin: |[The pre-occupied western attitude / mindset of an outsider, the author, concerning the people of Donbass, within the context of their belief, religion, and what they have suffered, is understandable, because of the impact of severe western propaganda |[Dr. Jonas Tögel: NATO’s Cognitive Warfare]|, on every single western citizen, spread via the mainstream media, and western politicians. However, the link that has been created by the author of the article between the text of the song, and the rhetoric of the WWII German leader and his people, is out of line, completely. Those with the WWII ideology do not live in Donbass, but in Kiev. For more info, watch the list with documentaries about Ukraine, and specifically about Stepan Bandera, a Ukrainian fascist, who is still honoured, every year, in Kiev, and praised in all schoolbooks in Ukraine, as a national hero. The existence of Neo Nazis in Kiev, since the Maidan Massacre and coup in Ukraine, is a fact, and not even hidden.]|
A few words on Donbass
Admin: The following text is a very short summary of the history of Ukraine. Jeffrey D. Sachs recommends in his article: The Ninth Anniversary Of The Ukraine War, published February 28, 2023, the documentary: Ukraine On Fire (Igor Lopatonok, Oliver Stone), published in 2016. Duration: 1:33:57
The first traces of settlements date back to the 7th century BC, when they were founded by the Scythians. Then came the nomads of the western steppes (between the Danube and the Altai). In the 16th century, the region was governed by the Zaporizhian Cossacks in the north and the Tatars of the Crimean Khanate in the south. In 1793, at the end of the Russo-Turkish War, the region was annexed by Catherine II to Russia. The event that significantly influenced the region’s subsequent development was the Crimean War of 1856. Indeed, coal imports from England, an enemy country, ceased. The Tsarist empire found itself forced to turn its attention to the Donbas coal basin. With the development of the railway network and the establishment of the steelworks in the late 19th century, the region became the iron and steel hub of the Russian Empire. In 1917, the Ukrainian People’s Republic was proclaimed in Kiev, pro-Kerensky and anti-Bolshevik. The Ukrainian Bolsheviks fled Kiev and took refuge in Donetsk, where they founded the “Donetsk-Krivoy Rog Soviet Socialist Republic” as a reaction to the Ukrainian People’s Republic. It lasted only a short time, less than a month, before being overwhelmed by the advance of the Germans who then occupied Ukraine. After the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the civil war between the Reds and the Whites from 1918 to 1920, the Soviets refused to recognize the independence of the Donetsk-Krivoy Rog Republic. They made it an oblast of Ukraine to promote its Russification.
Stalin’s forced industrialization led to significant development in the region at the expense of Ukrainian peasants, many of whom were deported to Siberia and decimated by the famine of 1932.
For the sequel, namely the civil war that began in 2014, see the report’s notes below.
Regarding the complexities of the Minsk agreements, it must be noted that they have not been respected by either side.
Admin: |[Benoît Paré writes on his LinkedIn profile ONLY about “the sabotage of the Minsk agreements by Ukraine”.]|
The most tangled knot (the conundrum, as the Anglo-Saxons call it) concerns the sequence of provisions set out in the protocol. For Ukraine, the military provisions must be implemented first, followed by the political ones; for Russia, the opposite is true.
Specifically, for Ukraine, the roadmap was: a ceasefire, Russian withdrawal from Donbas, return of the Russian-Ukrainian border to Ukrainian control, free and fair elections in Donbas, recognition of the territories in question as a result of a decentralization program, but not a special status with the ability to challenge them in parliament.
English machine-translation: Vladimir Skobtsov —- Skobtsov Vladimir Leonidovich – author of the Donbass national anthem “Donbass is behind us”, poet, bard, member of the Union of Writers of Russia. The great Junna Moritz called him the Orpheus of Donbass. Without leaving his fighting native Donetsk for 11 years, Vladimir Skobtsov wrote and published books of poems about Donbass – “Unconquered”, «Metal Resistance», «Donbass Za us (lyrics: Donbass is behind us https://stihi.ru/2020/09/08/8426)», co-authored many collections, translated into foreign languages. By decree of the President of Russia, for dedication, personal contribution to supporting the moral and psychological state and strengthening the morale of the participants of the Northern Military District, he was awarded the medal of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, laureate of the patriotic literary award “Prokhorovskoe Field”, laureate of the Russian Ministry of Defense award in the field of culture and art, laureate of the Orthodox Literary Prize of S. Nilus and other domestic awards. In the SVO he took part in the position of adviser to the head of the project “Detachment named after Maxim Krivonos”. Songs based on poems by Vladimir Skobtsov are performed by Sergei Galanin, Alexander Marshal, Yulia Chicherina, rock bands «SerGa», «Demarsh», «More», ensembles; Black Sea and Pacific fleets and others.
Junna MORITZ
LEGENDARY ORPHEUS OF DONBASS
“We didn’t recognize”. Impudent will The one under whom were you shaking?.
A. Pushkin “To the Slanderers of Russia” 1831
Poetry is the language of secret knowledge, the Old and New Testaments are written in this language, all the sacred books, all the myths of the peoples of the world, where the latest news of the day is both for tomorrow and for the day after tomorrow. Pushkin has a hundred times less high technology and a hundred times “worse” rhyme than today’s rhymes, who, with the delight of mutual admiration, recognized the brazen will of exactly who Russia should tremble under. Today, Russian poetry is divided into those who recognized and those who did not recognize this brazen will of the one under whom to tremble!.. The wonderful poet Vladimir Skobtsov did not recognize, and worse, he is the legendary Orpheus of Donbass, the great Resistance to trembling! Magnificent quotes of his poetry will survive any statute of limitations, but now I don’t want to turn him into a quotation tank and into a quotation bank. And I want you, the precious Reader, to see in this book a dear, living, reverent Man who has a strong, thoroughbred talent, God’s gift, the language of secret knowledge. And regardless of any events, such a poet is always a historical event, his poetry turns the reality of the hegemonster into invalidity!.. This is the language of secret knowledge – how not to tremble!.. ↩︎
Lyrics in English: (Machine-translation) Donbass is behind us Vladimir Skobtsov The Beast woke up in pitch darkness And the Beast to God is called the price Everyone caved in – and the brothers in Christ, Everything caved in, but not my country.
It was a fruitful leap year And the blood of death was drunk, drunk The sky bent from the clouds of lead Everything caved in, but not my country.
Here the fathers were not betrayed to memory Here they did not give up their grandfather’s land At what cost – you won’t find words Here they did not take care of life for the Fatherland.
And again Russian power is in the hands of Both life and death for the Motherland are red Stands and keeps the firmament for centuries My unconquered country.
Let him be destined to perish on the cross, But you can’t bring us to our knees In the bloody pole one for all Donbass stands and holds the firmament.
Chorus:
There is a flame in the middle of the sky And the choice is strict – Russia is with us, And God is with us!
In the middle of the sky, flame, And the choice is strict – Donbass is behind us, And God is with us!
Today, June 7, 2026, per month, 40,000 Ukrainians die in a war that the Kiev-Azov-Neo-Nazi regime and its western allies want to continue. NATO pushes Ukraine/Kiev to continue a fight, a war, that could have been avoided, if Boris Johnson would not have travelled to Istanbul, in 2022, with the Washington mission to eliminate the peace deal that was signed.
The original post, named “MH17”, published April 28, 2023, has been ENTIRELY changed on May 6, 2026, because of the recently published scientific book: The Russia-Ukraine War and its Origins (professor Ivan Katchanovski), and another book: What I saw in Ukraine (Benoît Paré, international observer), but also because the two links to Bellingcat had become meaningless: in 2023, when I published the original post, both links were directing to a Bellingcat web-page with a picture of a BUK, Russian made, in 2008, in Ukraine. The articles were still there, but the pictures of the BUK, with the text that included the year 2008, and that it were Russian BUKs, are gone. Bellingcat removed them.Go to the updated post.
Paperback – May 22, 2025 Author: Benoit Paré, born in Paris, in 1961, is living in Greece since 1986. He is a French army reserve officer and former defense ministry analyst. Most importantly, Mr. Paré worked for the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), as part of the seize-fire monitoring mission in Eastern Ukraine.
Ukraine 2015-2022.
A unique account of its kind, precise, sensitive, and personal, seen from the inside of an international mission at the heart of the Donbass war. The reality on the ground, from the front lines. New revelations, notably concerning civilian casualties, human rights violations, conflict-related trials, and the manipulation of facts. And then, how the US-sponsored Ukrainian ultra-nationalist project provoked Moscow’s reaction. This book is primarily intended for those who prioritize facts over partisanship and who want to understand how the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War II came about.
Video interview conducted by Pascal Lottaz, Neutrality Studies. Premiered on August 5, 2025: “Today I’m talking to Benoît Paré, a French army reserve officer and former defense ministry analyst. Most importantly, Mr. Paré worked for the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), as part of the seize-fire monitoring mission in Eastern Ukraine. He also wrote a book about this experiences in the Donbas with the title “What I saw in Ukraine: 2015-2022, Diary of an international Observer”.”
Maar ik hoorde er wel bij. Ik ging ook regelmatig in, en met de stroom mee, dat voelt lekker, samen, heerlijk, we zijn het eens, ja, inderdaad, Poetin deugt niet, moet je kijken, dat jacht dat besteld was in Italië. Bijvoorbeeld. Maar tegelijkertijd was er ook altijd iets wat niet alleen ik zag, wanneer, zoals in mijn geval, kijkend naar die ene documentaire over hem die, hoe merkwaardig is dat, nu niet meer terug te vinden is bij NPO Uitzending Gemist, in die enorme waslijst die aangereikt wordt daar wanneer je de zoekterm “Poetin” gebruikt, of zie ik die over het hoofd1? Hoe dan ook: ik werd me bewust, onderwijl kijkend, observerend, invoelend, luisterend: hij deugt. Ik kon daarom niet begrijpen waarom hij Oekraïne binnenviel. Nu, 2025, drie jaren verder en enorm veel historisch wetenschappelijk onderzoeksmateriaal, achtergrondinformatie en details rijker, begrijp ik waarom hij Oekraïne binnenviel. En…, iedereen die de feiten kent, zou hetzelfde gedaan hebben.
Daarom: ik hoor er niet meer bij. Ik schrijf dit nadat ik weer geconfronteerd werd met personen of een persoon, waar ik niet meer bij wil horen, maar die ik ondanks mijn pogingen hen te mijden, toch “tegen het lijf loop” in dit geval, via het scherm van mijn computer omdat ik als een in Noorwegen wonende Nederlandse graag af en toe naar niet-politieke, Nederlandse, ontspannende uitzendingen kijk, zoals Bed&Breakfast, Boer Zoekt Vrouw of RailAway. De overdosis aan negativiteit in de politieke wereld van vandaag moet worden gecompenseerd, nu en dan.
Maar….
Wat je ook opent, welke omroepzender dan ook, met de eigen talk show, de reclame spotjes —zelfs dat: adverteren door een omroep voor bijvoorbeeld “De kinderen van Rutte”2, een TV serie over Rutte die lesgeeft, die het volk moet overtuigen dat Rutte een waar-achtig mens zou zijn met een hart—je wordt ongevraagd en ongewild met propaganda geconfronteerd, en dus heb ik een trailer van die serie gezien. De Rutte propaganda wordt gewoon pal vóór een populair programma ingelast, zonder enige aankondiging, hoe slim, en het naïve volk, zich verkneukelend op wat er gaat komen, wordt ermee ingewreven, zapt niet, want men wil het komende programma niet missen, geen seconde ervan. Je kunt geen beter psychologisch perfect gekozen moment bedenken. Dus gebeurde dat ook.
“Bar Laat”, over Loretta Schrijver, met Jeroen Pauw en hé, Koblenko zit ook aan tafel.
Wanneer je uiteindelijk, nu, 2025 —na een leven lang geleefd te hebben (geboren in 1948), en mezelf verdiept te hebben in wat het westen is, terwijl ik leef in dat westen, en dus een constante waarnemer ben, een ervaringsdeskundige, een kritisch geworden ervaringsdeskundige— dan toch een keer meekijkt met het anders gemeden “Bar Laat”, vanwege het overlijden van Loretta Schrijver, en verwachtende dat Jeroen Pauw aanwezig zou zijn als gast, en ja, die was aanwezig, want samengewerkt met Loretta en jarenlang haar geliefde geweest, dan zit daar ook Victoria Koblenko aan tafel als, jawel, politicoloog.3 Ik heb na de intro van “Bar Laat”, met Jeroen Pauw, niet verder gekeken, want geen zin in Koblenko of enige andere gast.
Koblenko: politicoloog?
Koblenko heeft inderdaad politicologie gestudeerd in Leiden—las ik in Wikipedia4, bij gebrek aan een website van haar die adequate informatie biedt, want “under construction”—en behaalde het bachelor niveau. Maar ben je met alleen een bachelor diploma ook inderdaad een politicoloog?
Dat Koblenko absoluut niet op de hoogte is van de historische en politieke feiten in Oekraïne, terwijl ze gevraagd wordt om haar zegje te doen als zelf-benoemd “expert” in allerlei talk-shows en via lezingen, getuigen haar eigen woorden, waarin duidelijk wordt aan welke kant zij staat5. Ze heeft zelfs een interview6 gemaakt met wat men noemt “de first lady van Oekraïne”, terwijl die helemaal geen first lady meer is, omdat de termijn van de man in het groene T-shirt officieel verstreken is, en omdat we inmiddels weten wie die man in dat groene T-shirt werkelijk is… , en daarom zou Koblenko geen interview met die “lady” hebben moeten willen afnemen. Voor de vele feiten over Zelensky verwijs ik graag naar de echte Oekraïne deskundigen, die te vinden zijn in dit blog.
Hoe die oorlog is begonnen, waarom, wat er in het zuidoosten van Oekraïne aan oorlogsgeweld plaatsvond vanuit en door Kiev zelf, met raketaanvallen, terreur, volkerenmoord en meer, omdat er Russen wonen die zich, terecht overigens en vooral begrijpelijk want gediscrimineerd door Kiev, niet wilden conformeren met de pro USA regering die na de door USA georkestreerde coup in 2014 zitting nam in Kiev, en wat allemaal terug te vinden is in door onderzoeksjournalisten gemaakte opnames aldaar: ze weet het niet, hoeft kennelijk niets te lezen, want “door geboorte deskundig” omdat ze geboren is in Oekraïne, in 1980, in Vinnytsja7. Dat is 45 jaren geleden. Ze verhuisde mee met haar ouders (waarom verhuisden die?) naar Nederland in 1992, dat is 32 jaren geleden. De omstandigheden in de relatie tussen Oekraïne en Rusland waren toen bovendien totaal anders dan die nu zijn. Welke informatiebronnen zij gebruikt is niet te achterhalen omdat haar website8 nog in opbouw is. Hoelang al? Wanneer mensen haar vragen naar informatie over Oekraïne is zij verplicht aan te kunnen tonen waar zij die vandaan haalt, zodat men weet of datgene wat zij gaat vertellen pro-Oekraïne is of tegen-Oekraïne want zij volgt daadwerkelijk de mensen die Oekraïne afbreken, en schuldig zijn aan de moord op Oekraïners door hen de oorlog in te sturen. Alle details en feiten zijn o.a. in dit blog te vinden.
Er is vooral in Oekraïne een enorm gebrek aan betrouwbare bronnen, en dat wordt aangetoond door het feit dat de oppositiepartij-leider Oleksandr Dubinsky ….. in een Oekraïense gevangenis zit en geen contact mag onderhouden met de buitenwereld. Professor Glenn Diesen9, heeft desondanks een interview10 met hem weten te regelen.
Koblenko wil ooit terug. Naar wat? En als wie?
De doden die zijn gevallen waren nog in leven geweest wanneer Koblenko en politieke soortgenoten begonnen waren met het bestuderen van de feiten die de mainstream media niet melden, want verplicht om westerse propaganda te kopiëren, te plakken en te publiceren, waardoor het eenvoudig blijft om de rode draad in een talk show te houden, en alles als “wij gelijkgezinden onder elkaar” naar buiten toe uit te stralen, met hier en daar wellicht—want zo ging het altijd—een andere stem, die dan toch weer overstemd werd door een andere gast gekozen door de propaganda machine achter de schermen.
Het Oekraïne zoals dit door de mainstream media getoond wordt bestaat niet. De realiteit is anders, maar dan moet je willen en durven kijken. Koblenko kijkt niet. Het Oekraïne dat zij verliet bestaat niet meer. Het is mogelijk dat er een heel andere wind gaat waaien in Oekraïne, wanneer Oleksandr Dubinsky (zie voetnoot 7) president zou worden. Er zijn nog geen verkiezingen geweest. Zelensky wil aanblijven. Doorvechten. Nog meer Oekraïners moeten worden afgeslacht.
Het Nederlandse schatkist-geld is op
De talk show “Bar Laat” begon, net zoals alle omroepen dat doen momenteel, met het laten zien van deze advertentie: Laat de Publieke Omroep Niet Wegbezuinigen11.
Ook die advertentie had er helemaal niet hoeven te zijn, wanneer Nederland zichzelf niet arm gemaakt had aan de oorlog in Oekraïne, door ook Nederland zelf geprovoceerd, want lid van NAVO, en dan had al dat geld in de staatskas kunnen blijven, de Groningers eindelijk hun huizen gekregen die beloofd zijn door nu-NAVO secretaris, dan hadden de slachtoffers van de belastingaffaire allemaal gekregen wat hun beloofd was, want hun recht, dan was er geen energiecrisis geweest, geen inflatie, dan waren er geen bezuinigingen nodig geweest op onderwijs, gezondheidszorg, en nu dus de omroepen, en dan had Koblenko gewoon nu al terug kunnen keren naar een Oekraïne dat, zoals voor de coup in 2014, nauw samenwerkte, in vrede, met Rusland.
Update, Maart 31, 2025 / Dat de Nederlandse schatkist leger en leger wordt (hoe bijzonder, dat woord “leger” in deze context) komt onder meer ook door wat in de nieuwsbrief12 van Investigate Europe staat geschreven over ook het Nederlandse “leger”: “Europese leiders beloven de defensie-uitgaven te verhogen. Er worden miljarden euro’s vrijgemaakt om nationale legers te versterken en gezamenlijke militaire initiatieven uit te breiden.”
Koblenko is met haar Ruslandhaat-campagne een voor een oorlogszuchtig EU belangrijk psychologisch wapen om een sterk vijandbeeld te creëren, dat nodig is om de goedkeuring van het [ten onrechte] russofoob13 gemaakte volk af te dwingen voor de noodzaak van onverantwoorde want volstrekt onnodige financiële uitgaven van een groter leger en meer wapens, dat alleen het imago van Brussel dient, want de schaamte voor de overigens lang geleden al voorspelde nederlaag in die door NAVO/USA/EU uitgedaagde oorlog moet verstopt worden. Dat vijandbeeld is precies wat Koblenko aan het volk “verkoopt” in talk shows, lezingen en ook “Libelle”, één van de allereerste -opgericht in 1934- en meest gelezen damesbladen in Nederland en Vlaams België14, waarin o.a. haar interview met “de first lady van Oekraïne” verscheen1516. Professor Glenn Diesen schreef een boek over russofobie17.
Katchanovski
Jij, Koblenko, verdient geld met westerse propaganda, en ondermijnt daarmee elke vorm van toekomst voor Oekraïne. Neem eens serieus de tijd voor een echte studie, en begin met Dr. Ivan Katchanovski18. Ook een Oekraïner, een politieke wetenschapper, moedig, want de feiten tot op de bodem onderzoekend, en ermee naar buiten komend ook19, tegen de stroom van de verraders en huichelaars in, de gehersenspoelden, ondanks de gevaren ervan, omdat tegen de stroom in denken en handelen gevaarlijk is, zoals Gonzalo Lira20 heeft moeten ervaren. Er zijn diverse westerse onafhankelijke onderzoeksjournalisten die het leven zuur gemaakt is, en wordt. Er zijn zelfs westerse dissidenten die het westen ontvlucht zijn. Waaronder bijvoorbeeld Oekraïne onderzoeker Eva Karene Bartlett21 (documentaires Donbass22), en Ben Norton23 (China)
Wanneer klaar met het bestuderen van de onderzoeken van Dr. Ivan Katchanovski: ga verder met Dr. Jeffrey D. Sachs24, Dr. Glenn Diesen25, etc.26.
Zeer selectief zijn, leren wat betrouwbaar is en waarom
Zomaar iets kiezen uit de door YouTube aangereikte lijst na het gebruik van zoektermen levert info op die onbetrouwbaar kan zijn, misleidend, of zelfs gelogen en dus af te raden. Gedurende de afgelopen jaren heb ik deze lijst27 samengesteld met namen, die te checken zijn, via websites, en die 100% betrouwbaar zijn gebleken. Er zijn inmiddels ook personen door mij weer van die lijst verwijderd, wanneer bleek dat die onwaarheden verkondigden, waarvan ik zeker wist dat het onwaarheden waren, of aannames, want niet bewezen. Ook personen die te kennen gaven in videos bijvoorbeeld pro-Trump te zijn, omdat het een held zou zijn, die een aanslag overleefde, zijn verwijderd. Ik streef naar neutraliteit, naar verifieerbare waarheden. De geschiedenis liegt niet, maar het westen verzwijgt wel heel bewust en zorgvuldig delen van de geschiedenis, of negeert die, gemakshalve. Er is volop materiaal verzameld om mee aan de slag te gaan. Dit geldt voor iedereen die wakker wil worden. Ik voer geen Russische propaganda, ik publiceer logica, feiten, en indien die feiten door Russen worden verteld, want gecontroleerd waar, dan zou ik de waarheid onrecht aandoen door die feiten links te laten liggen. Datzelfde geldt voor iedere wereldburger. Ook voor jou, Koblenko.
Politicoloog?
Tot je werkelijk op de hoogte bent, Koblenko: verwijder de titel politicoloog. Je bent het niet voordat de titel “Dr.” voor je naam staat, maar zelfs dan ben je nog niet per se Oekraïne-Rusland deskundige. Daar komt veel en veel meer bij kijken. Je toont aan dat je gewoon simpelweg en rechtuit gezegd: onwetend bent, zelfs bewust onwetend omdat er overal correcte neutrale informatie te vinden is, en omdat je jezelf politicoloog noemt ben je mijns inziens verplicht het volk voor te lichten met feiten, niet met wat “cherry-picking” feitjes, of wat 1-dags impressies, wat gevoelens betreffende Kiev en de voornaam van je zoon, een interview met een Oekraïne-onwaardige persoon die samen met wie zij haar man noemt in Canada applaudisseerde voor een Duitse nazi veteraan28, haar “man” volgt terwijl ze weet dat die vuile oorlog door toedoen van haar man realiteit werd door te luisteren naar Boris Johnson29, doch gestopt had kunnen worden, en weet van de jaarlijkse pro Bandera30 tochten in Kiev (of weet je dat niet Koblenko?), nee, de volle waarheid, tot in alle complexe details en sub details.
Laatste nieuws, ook voor jou, Koblenko
01. Kit Klarenberg: ECHR Finds Ukraine Responsible for Odessa Massacre31 Gepubliceerd: Maart 30, 2025 Op: Substack
02. Update: April 1, 2025: Een propaganda artikel in de New York Times, geanalyseerd door professor Pascal Lottaz, Neutrality Studies. “New York Times: De VS neemt alle operationele beslissingen in Oekraïne en wil dat er meer Oekraïners sterven.” / “New York Times: USA Running All Operational Decisions in Ukraine, Wants More Ukrainians To Die.32”
Natuurlijk zou ik beschouwd kunnen worden als iemand die ook kopieert en plakt, als een papegaai fungeert, betreffende het intellectuele gedachtegoed van alle genoemde wetenschappers. Echter. Mijn eigen goed ontwikkelde autonome denken vond herkenning in wat die wetenschappers vertelden, heb het ervaren als het grootste intellectuele goed dat een mens kan ontvangen. Eindelijk kwamen er echte denkers op mijn pad, betreffende de wereldpolitiek en wereldgeschiedenis. Alle puzzelstukjes vielen op hun plek met hetgeen zij aanreikten.
Wikipedia, Victoria Koblenko, studie: “Tijdens haar vaste rol in GTST studeerde ze tussen 1999 en 2008 Politicologie en Ruslandkunde aan de Universiteit Leiden. Ruslandkunde maakte ze niet af. In 2008 behaalde ze een bachelordiploma voor de studie Politicologie.” https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Koblenko#Vroegere_levensloop↩︎
Glenn Diesen is a professor of Russian international affairs, with focus on geo-economics, conservatism and the Greater Eurasia Initiative. Substack: https://glenndiesen.substack.com↩︎
Canadian Eva Karene Bartlett, born June 14, 1977, is an award-winning independent journalist with extensive experience in Syria (15 trips between 2014 & 2021, some months-long) and also in occupied Palestine (spent 8 months in the West Bank & a cumulative three years in the Gaza Strip, from late 2008 to June 2010, and back in 2011 off and on to March 2013). also reported extensively from the Donbass (9 visits, from 2019 on) and from Venezuela.
Eva Karene Bartlett, on December 9, 2016, Press Conference United Nations – Watch video
X post: “The brave Eva Bartlett lectures Norwegian MSM journalists on the Syria narrative and the MSM’s deceptive lies. (UN conference 2016). She also points to what Glenn Diesen write today – “The main source for the media in the Syrian war has been the ‘Syrian Observatory for Human Rights’, which is actually just one guy in the UK…” Video
The original post, published April 28, 2023, was titled: “MH17”, and, has been ENTIRELY changed on May 6, 2026, because of the recently published scientific book: The Russia-Ukraine War and its Origins (professor Ivan Katchanovski), and another book: What I saw in Ukraine (Benoît Paré, international observer), but also because the two links to Bellingcat had become meaningless: in 2023, when I published the original post, both links were directing to a Bellingcat web-page with a picture of a BUK, Russian made, in 2008, in Ukraine. The articles were still there, but the pictures of the BUK, with the text that included the year 2008, and that it were Russian BUKs, are gone.
B.INDEX
1. New Evidence
THOUGH DENIED IN THE FINAL CONCLUSION OF THE COURT CASE IN 2022, THERE WAS INDEED A WAR ONGOING IN UKRAINE IN JULY 2014, WHEN THE MH17 FLEW OVER UKRAINE
2. Responsibility and accountability
Unanswered questions, ignored questions, not asked questions that have to be answered, because possible to answer today via the new evidence about the real culprit. The real culprit is the west. Not Moscow.
3. To be investigated: the role of Rutte
3a. Rutte today, as NATO secretary general. His warmongering, undiplomatic, provocative behaviour
3b. TO BE INVESTIGATED: Rutte’s role in the MH17 story
3c. TO BE INVESTIGATED: the procedure of becoming a NATO secretary general
4. The role of Kiev, Porochenko and USA
Accountable for the downing of the MH17. Porochenko, and therefore USA as well, since Porochenko was a western marionette, knew, was informed, and silenced what he knew. He has committed perjury.
5. Re-opening the MH17 case
The books of Ivan Katchanovski, Benoît Paré, and the White Book, published by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation in March 2014, plus the NYT article, published on June 14, 2014, and the in 1 mentioned Human Rights Watch articles, plus the documentary about Donbass, are crucial to create an exact view on the real political situation in Ukraine, to be able to find the real culprit, within the downing of the MH17.
The books did not exist yet on November 17, 2022 (court decision).
The NYT article however did indeed exist, but was “overlooked”(?), together with the Human Rights Watch letter and articles, plus The White Book, a report of violations of human rights in Ukraine from November 2013 till March 2014, published by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. This study was not taken into account, which proves that the Judges in the court case were not objective, but committed to the NATO / Pentagon, Washington scenario.
All this together shows that the court case end result was a scam, therefore illegal, and has to be re-opened, to start from scratch.
6. Wikipedia spreads misinformation and blocks world peace.
6a. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE, WHY NOT?
6b. The Wikipedia MH17 data from 2014 has been completely deleted.
6c. The Wikipedia version of the MH17 today
6d. The Wikipedia page about the Maidan Massacre has to be completely revised
6e. The Wikipedia page about Ukraine must be completely revised
7. Consortium news
Hundred articles (with comments) about the downing of MH17, by independent investigative journalists
8. Kees van der Pijl’s scholarly work on the downing of the MH17, amidst the Ukrainian war
This is the first scholarly work on the Ukrainian unrest (today, May 2026, proven to be a war, by professor Ivan Katchanovski, admin.) and the tragic downing of MH17. It offers an analysis that challenges the Western consensus surrounding these events, emphasising the geopolitical and economic context of the West’s standoff with Russia, the BRICS bloc, and the struggles over the EU’s energy supply. Based on previously unpublished government and NATO documents as well as a wide array of sources this book offers an analysis of global political economy and contemporary debates about Russia and East-West relations.
1. NEW EVIDENCE – THE CIVIL WAR STARTED IN EARLY 2014, AND ESCALATED BEFORE JULY 2014
THOUGH DENIED IN THE FINAL CONCLUSION OF THE COURT CASE IN 2022, THERE WAS INDEED A WAR ONGOING IN UKRAINE IN JULY 2014, WHEN THE MH17 FLEW OVER UKRAINE
The October 2025 published book: “The Russia-Ukraine War and its Origins“, written by professor Ivan Katchanovski, offers the evidence that in early 2014 a by the USA well-prepared civil war started in Ukraine, as part of the total war somewhere in the future, with Russia. All started in Kiev, with the Maidan Massacre [17 February 2014], the killing of hundred innocent people, by pro-USA forces. This has been in-depth investigated by professor Ivan Katchanovsky, and been exposed via his analyses of many videos that have also been used also as evidence during a trial. Also the court sessions have been filmed, and are published on professor Katchanovsky’s YouTube channel. The Maidan Massacre was the intro to the also by the USA well-prepared and backed coup, that took place in Kiev, on February 21, 2014. [Watch: discussion about the book.]
This book creates therefore also the immediate necessity of a re-opening of the MH17 case: because on July 17, 2014, there was a war in South East Ukraine, between separatists in Donbass (the MH17 was flying over Donbass/ Donetsk, so over a war zone in Ukraine) and the USA/Kiev regime, under the full control of Washington, in which many thousands1 of Ukrainians were killed in the South East, by Kiev.
Donbass, a documentary, made by Anne Laure Bonnel, after she travelled to Donbass on January 15, 2015, to film the unbelievable. The documentary was published on her YouTube channel in 2022.
Porochenkoin 2014: “We will have benefits for pensioners and children, they will not! Our children will go to school and kindergarden, their children will stay in the cellars! Because they can’t do anything. And that’s how, precisely that, we will win this war.”
WAR Mind the word “war“, because this is a rejected detail in the MH17 court case, and reason why the final court decision plead “guilty” into the direction of Russia. Benoît Paré shows in his book ( a diary), published in 2025, how the US-sponsored Ukrainian ultranationalist project provoked Moscow’s reaction. This is also a missing detail in the final court case decision. Reason why the court case has to be re-opened.
This website explains on November 15, 2014, that Poroshenko’s words have been taken out of the true context. However: the new scientific evidence of the reality in Ukraine came not earlier than 2025, via professor Ivan Katchanovski, and Benoît Paré. The study from March 2014 provided by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation in “White Book“, is not accepted as reliable (because Russian originated), while it has to be part of an independent investigation, independent media, and court cases (Lady Justice is independent).
Other reliable sources have simply been ignored, like the info provided by Human-Rights Watch, the info provided by Consortium News, the New York Times, and Voltaire Net. Taking this new, plus older but ignored, evidence into account here, the words Porochenko spoke, have to be understood exactly for what they are: western propaganda, pro NATO, pro USA, and anti-Russia.
The documentary “Donbass”, made by Anne-Laure Bonnel, January 2015, showing the war situation in Donbass, that started in early 2014. In this documentary Porochenko mentions the term “war” between the separatists and the Kiev regime.
The witness documentaries with interviews, made by Eva Karene Bartlett
Jens Stoltenberg: NATO Expansion Was Key to Russian Invasion of Ukraine
Additional, aligned with Benoît Paré’s diary: Jens Stoltenberg, the Norwegian secretary general of NATO from 2014 to 2024, admits NATO Expansion Was Key to Russian Invasion of Ukraine: In this video Stoltenberg confesses:
“Then Putin declared in the autumn of 2021 and he actually sent a draft treaty that he wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement. That is what he sent us. That was a precondition for not to invade Ukraine. Of course we didn’t sign that. The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign a promise never to enlarge NATO. He wanted us to remove military infrastructure in all allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe. We should remove NATO from that part of our alliance. Introducing some kind of A and B, a second class membership. We rejected that. So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO close to his borders. He has got exact the opposite. He has got more NATO presence in the Eastern part of the alliance.” Source: X, Source: Jeffrey D. Sachs, Source: YouTube. More about Ukraine and NATO: https://backups.blog/2024/04/09/ukraine-and-nato/
Additional: Secretary of NATO from 2009-2014 the Danish Anders Fogh Rasmussen, is still a NATO lobbyist. He wrote the book: The Will to Lead: America’s Indispensable Role in the Global Fight for Freedom. The title is a scam, glorifying a CIA ruled, economic fascist regime [Economic Fascism][CIA: Undermining and Nazifying Ukraine Since 1953]. “The will to lead” is based on white supremacism, racism, modern colonialism, and derived from the ideological dreaming (phantasy), that USA has to be the hegemon [The US motivation is to be number one, (bottom page 5)]. The US does not fight for freedom, it follows a typically American crooks system: regime change everywhere possible in the world via a coup, followed by theft, exploitation of all what is below the surface of the soil of a country, like oil and rare minerals, and when all is taken, leaving the country ruined behind, and in extreme poverty. This is proven via statements, from former ambassadors, witnesses, colonels, CIA analysts, history writers, etc. to be found in this list: Political Analysts / Experts. Anders Fogh Rasmussen is therefore legalizing, even promoting the war in Ukraine, guilty of demonizing Russia, supporting a war-criminal regime in Washington and complicit, together with Stoltenberg and Rutte, in the elimination of young Ukrainians, who were and still are pushed (arrested on the streets and transported) to fight in a completely meaningless NATO war that could have been avoided, following logic, and diplomacy, in a very simple way. On NATO’s banner is written: “Provoke! Fight! Die! For us, NATO!” The USA is practicing pathological political meddling world wide, with the mask of the Good Guy, while being the aggressor, the human rights violator even in its own USA, and committing war crimes.
The MH17 was flying over a war-zone, on July 17, 2014. Entire Ukraine was a war zone since February 2014, and reason why in the meantime passenger flights from London and Paris were avoiding the Ukrainian airspace.
Excerpt from a video, published in 2014, by Global News:
Missiles were crossing the skies above Ukraine, and yes, Kiev-Ukraine had its own anti-aircraft warfare, also buks, which were all made in Russia in that time. The in general Russian population in the south-east received support from Russia. The rest of Ukraine received support from the collective west. The NATO goal, and cause of the Russia-Ukraine war, the NATO membership of Ukraine, became official in 2008, but was already planned in 2002. The NATO membership was not the wish of the Ukrainian people:
On April 5, 2024, Professor Glenn Diesen shared on X: The polling reveals NATO membership was deeply unpopular among Ukrainians even AFTER Russia took back Crimea: – Between 1991 and 2014 (before the coup), all polls revealed only 20% of Ukrainians wanted to join NATO, despite fierce efforts by the US.
Question 1: Why did the new, pro-American Ukrainian government at the time, in 2014, not warn the Netherlands—a befriended nation, therefore, because it is pro-American—of the extreme danger concerning flying over a war zone, Donetsk/Donbass?
Question 2: Who is/are primarily liable for the downing of MH17? Apparently—and one can state that this is highly remarkable or dangerously negligent—no briefing took place from Ukraine to the countries outside, the EU, and thus not with the Netherlands either; otherwise, this disaster would never have occurred. One may assume with certainty that the danger of an airplane crash in Kyiv was known, especially since the country was—and is—informed, supported, and coached by the USA. The USA has control over everything; it has informants and supervisors. The CIA. It is therefore evident that the Ukrainian government was fully aware of the war in Donetsk and of real and life-threatening dangers concerning air traffic in the airspace above Donetsk.
Question 3: When will people in Europe, in the Netherlands, become aware of the liability, of the unforgivable negligence of Ukraine and the USA in this matter?
Question 4: Is the withholding of information, the failure to issue warnings, resulting in such a disaster, to be charged as WAR CRIME, in this case committed by the USA and Ukraine?
3. TO BE INVESTIGATED: THE ROLE OF RUTTE
3a. Rutte today, as NATO secretary general.
Rutte is excessively active in spreading NATO war-propaganda, uses extremely provocative, rude, humiliating rhetoric, filled with delusional grandeur, misinformation and pathological lies. Unfortunately the one despicable video has been withdrawn from YouTube, recently published, the one in which Rutte requests parents to sacrifice their sons and daughters to the NATO war against Russia, while demonizing Putin, who has factually not asked anything else than a neutral Ukraine, and the end of NATO expansion, in order to protect his own people against NATO expansion and NATO aggression. Related with this subject are “NATO’s Cognitive Warfare“, and “State Terrorism and Cognitive Warfare – Understanding Propaganda“. About NATO expansion: click start; 2 minutes watch time…..
NATO expansion animation film, with updates till 2022. Finland and Sweden followed quickly later.
3b. TO BE INVESTIGATED: Rutte’s role in the MH17 story, his absent information to Schiphol and Malaysia that Ukraine’s airspace should be avoided: and THUS
1. his possible, even conscious choice in 2014, NOT to warn Schiphol in order to demonstrate to NATO that he is willing to do anything [the goal justifies the means] to become NATO Secretary General
2. and thus meet the conditions to pass the screening regarding 100% loyalty to NATO interests
3. and thus war industry interests, and to demonstrate cooperation with NATO objectives—in this case the downfall of Russia, the end of Russia—and create anti-Russia sentiment in the Netherlands and elsewhere in the world,
4. and THUS even willingsacrifice innocent civilians, in order to turn the anti-Russia sentiment into deep-black hatred, disgust, and to make the Dutch willing to sacrifice their children and grandchildren to a war that could have been prevented if the truth had come to light, but which is heavily censored.
Excerpt from a video, published in 2014, by Global News:
Note: The by the USA orchestrated and well prepared Maidan Massacre was a similar sacrifice of innocent people [shown by professor Ivan Katchanovski in his scientific work The Russia-Ukraine War and its Origins] to realize the political goal: an overthrow of the pro-Russia government in Kiev, via a coup, that was following some days later. My hypothesis: The sacrifice of the passengers and crew of the MH17 was used by USA/NATO to create deep-felt Russia hatred, and legalize a war against Russia, to create pro-USA sentiment, and to create anti-Russia sentiment.
Rutte, who has shown during his 4 cabinets, daring to behave inhumane 2,3, has not shown a single sign of compassion, ever, is granite-hard, and is now the VVD [Dutch right wing political party] “whisperer”. During the latest decennia a VVD member was minister of defence in 8 out of 11 cabinets. Rutte is VVD member, has been VVD list-leader, and was during 6 cabinets out of 11, PM.
Rutte was Prime Minister at the time of the downing of the MH17 and is 100% liable for information provided to Schiphol.
3c. TO BE INVESTIGATED: the procedure of becoming a NATO secretary general
When does a search for a new secretary general start?
Are eventual candidates monitored, and then invited if they are maybe interested in the job?
What must the skills of the new secretary general be?
Are there tests, exams, investigations, going deep into a candidate’s personal life, education, family, circle of friends, sexual preferences, religion, etc., similar to what candidate ambassadors or UN secretary candidates have to endure, or even worse?
Rutte‘s skills, as secretary of NATO, and shown (undeniable evidence) in videos published by NATO
unprecedented shamelessness and unscrupulousness via cognitive warfare
consciously creating mass hysteria
demonizing Russia
silencing EU’s sanctioning of Europeans (psychological terror)
for 100% committed to the NATO goal: destroying Russia, whatever it may cost, lives do not matter
the goal justifies the means
therefore willing to spread the NATO ideology, even if it results in the end of life on earth
therefore willing to commit war crimes
therefore willing to commit crimes against humanity
therefore the perfect NATO secretary, and chosen: he passed all exams, and within my hypothesis about the complicit factor in the MH17 “accident”, he successfully passed the MH14 “100% committed to NATO” exam
4. THE ROLE OF KIEV, POROCHENKO AND USA
Scroll for more down to: WIKIPEDIA HAS TO BE REVIEWED AND UPDATED, 2. The Wikipedia version of the MH17 today
If Porochenko “forgot” to warn Rutte, then it is Porochenko / the USA who are the one and only culprit and fully accountable for the consequences of the failure to inform, or the intentional NOT informing, because they had, like Rutte as secretary general of NATO once in the then nearby future, a personal interest in the downing of MH17, since this “accident” incited hatred against Russia, fuelled the ignorant people’s desire for revenge, and legalized NATO expansion.
The Kiev coup regime / the collective west and mainstream media legalized the war with lies, misinformation, silencing information, Putin was demonized because a killer, NATO terrorism was upgraded to heroic deeds, and NATO expansion was made necessary via lies.
In my hypothesis the downing of the MH17 was planned, and nothing less than a conspiracy. Those who were sacrificed, passengers and crew of the MH17, are —like those who were killed in the Maidan Massacre, 5 months earlier, orchestrated and executed by pro-USA terrorists, source the scientific work of Ivan Katchanovski, free available here— martyrs, victims of western colonialism, greedand American hegemony.
The latest book by Maidan Massacre expert, the scientist Ivan Katchanovski, and the book of Benoit Paré, “What I saw in Ukraine, 2015-2022 – Diary of an International Observer, are pieces of evidence that have not been discussed or mentioned in any Dutch newspaper article, NOS broadcast, Pauw, Jinek, etc..
Benoît Paré’s book starts with the Ukraine after the downing of the MH17, but it contains important information about the situation, the facts and acts we never heard via the mainstream media, and the judge in the court case not either. This book is an official report about the political facts and acts in South East Ukraine, and how the US-sponsored Ukrainian ultranationalist project provoked Moscow’s reaction. More about What I saw in Ukraine.
Of the highest importance is also the White Book On Violations Of Human Rights And the Rule of Law in Ukraine – 2013/2014, published in April 2014, by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to learn to understand the expansion of the civil war in Ukraine into a full-scale civil war, in the summer of 2014, when the MH17 was flying IN and OVER the war-zone, IN Ukraine, not in Russia. That Russia intervened in the civil war was due to the violations of human rights in Donbass, where many Russians live. In the documentary made by Anne-Laure Bonnel you can also see at 33:38 in the video a Russian humanitarian convoy with food, and other needs, for the people in Donbass.
List with evidence that there was a war in South East Ukrainealready before July 17, 2014
Professor Ivan Katchanovski – His scientific investigation The Russia-Ukraine War and its Origins, published in 2026, starting with the USA backed Maidan Massacre and Coup in 2014
The documentary “Donbass”, made by Anne-Laure Bonnel, January 2015, showing the war situation in Donbass, that started in early 2014. In this documentary Porochenko mentions the term “war” between the separatists and the Kiev regime.
The book, written by Benoît Paré: What I saw in Ukraine, 2015-2022 – Diary of an International Observer. This book is an official report about the political facts and acts in South East Ukraine, and how the US-sponsored Ukrainian ultranationalist project provoked Moscow’s reaction.
These books, articles and videos are the evidence that lies have been told, the truth concealed, while NATO propaganda and lies are tolerated, not even discussed. Sacrificing your children to senseless violence is absurd. But tolerated. How bizarre is the time we live in now.
Note: In a video, published on April 21, 2026, the Dutch Ukraine-Russia-expert Marie-Thérèse ter Haar speaks about Rutte’s negligence to travel to Ukraine after the MH17 accident. He never went there. This fits within the hypothesis I shared above. Someone, including Rutte, who is part of the cause, according to my hypothesis, would then face the consequences of his own actions, and thus his own guilt, and so he stayed home.
6. WIKIPEDIA SPREADS MISINFORMATION, AND BLOCKS WORLD PEACE
Since the ignorant crowds use Wikipedia, I add the following about Wikipedia, and urge their editors to update the lies into evidence based science and facts.Because, as ambassador Jack Matlock says: “Western Leaders Became Ideological ‘War Criminals’ “.[But Wikipedia contributors and users do not understand who are ruling the world, and Wikipedia.]
6a.WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE, WHY NOT?
Consensus-Based Content: The reality however is completely different from Wikipedia claims. The Wikipedia community is shaped as a pyramid, with many contributors at the base, and a powerful hierarchical system in many layers upward, with one final decisionmaker at the top who decides what is correct or not. So, though Wikipedia denies this, it IS indeed a dictatorial hierarchical system, that only SEEMS to be democratical. Contributors have all a nickname, and nobody, with some rare exceptions, knows their personal name, education, nationality. So, in case you “debate” about an issue, you do not have any idea with who you are discussing, his level of intelligence, education, etc.
Categories: In Wikipedia are several categories. Politics is one of these. Pages about politics are generally scam, and only those who are really informed, discover the scam, the lies, the misinformation, twisting of facts, etc. This is possible because the top of the pyramid follows the rules of the oligarchs behind the screens. Professor Ivan Katchanovski has been victim of scammers, Wikipedia contributors, who follow the mainstream media misinformation and upgrading this misinformation into facts, and, because of their power on the hierarchical vertical line to the top, they can remove scientific facts and add misinformation, even able to categorize the original text into “conspiracy theory”, and by doing so, humiliating the authentic author, the scientist. In public. There are lots of pages about people in the world, where only slander and lies is to be found. And it stays there. Not everybody has the skills to change it, or to remove it, do not know who to connect with who is able to delete the lies. Professor Ivan Katchanovski has discovered the names of the scammers and the text about subjects could be finally restored.
Source Citation: Wikipedia writes: “Information must be based on reputable, third-party sources (books, journals, reputable news)”. However, we know that we live in a world of lies, and that lies are the new truth. That science can be prostituted, that newspapers and other media are owned by oligarchs, who need the lies to continue their economic profit.
Neutrality: Though Wikipedia claims to be neutral: it is not neutral at all.
We need independent media. Independent investigative journalists. These have to be checked constantly as well. That is what I do. I have created a list with reliable sources, and this list is constantly edited.
6b. The Wikipedia MH17 data from 2014 has been completely deleted.
The flight details, as they were displayed on Wikipedia at the time, when I posted that memorial photo on Flickr (see also the information below the photo on Flickr), SO IN 2014:
On July 17, 2014, at 12:14 p.m. (CEST), the Boeing 777 departed from Schiphol Airport for a scheduled flight to Kuala Lumpur International Airport. Shortly after 2:00 p.m. (CEST), the aircraft climbed from 31,000 feet (9,450 meters) to 33,000 feet (10,060 meters) upon entering Ukrainian airspace. The airspace over Ukraine was closed up to 32,000 feet (9,750 meters) but was open above that. The aircraft disappeared from radar around 3:18 p.m. (CEST) east of the Ukrainian city of Donetsk, 50 kilometers from the Russian border. At that time, it was following a more northerly route than in the preceding days. The reason for the deviating route over the conflict zone could have been a significant storm on the originally planned route. The wreckage of the aircraft was found scattered over an area of 35 square kilometers. The tail lay 10 kilometers away from other wreckage, an indication that the plane disintegrated at high altitude.
Note: In 2014, there was mention of a “conflict zone” and a storm. That storm was supposedly the reason for flying higher—so not the “conflict zone“—to 33,000 feet. In today’s version, there is no longer any mention of a “conflict zone,” but rather that the Russo-Ukrainian war was ongoing around Donetsk at that time. And: it was a scheduled flight. That, too, was not mentioned in the 2014 version. The word “conflict zone” has therefore been correctly changed. Nothing is written about the storm anymore. Why not, I wonder.
6c. The Wikipedia version of the MH17 today
…contains extended text, aligned with the on false information, lies and absence of objectivity based court decision, on November 17, 2022.
Wikipedia: About 90 minutes after the incident, Ukraine closed all routes in Eastern Ukrainian airspace, at all altitudes. The incident dramatically heightened fears about airliner shoot-downs, leading to some airlines announcing that they would avoid flying over the conflict zones.
Wikipedia: “Three other commercial aircraft were in the vicinity when the Malaysian airliner was shot down.” The entire Wikipedia page: here
Commercial aircraft was flying over a war zone, and Porochenko / Kiev / USA were and are accountable for keeping the Ukrainian airspace open for commercial aircraft. They knew:
1. Evidence that Porochenko did not take his responsibility / accountability
6e. The Wikipedia page about Ukraine must be completely revised
Because of all new and older information and evidence, like Gallup maps about Ukraine 2012 and 2014, containing also tables, graphics, and also the White Book On Violations Of Human Rights And the Rule of Law in Ukraine, published in April 2014, by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, plus all investigative journalism provided by Voltairenet in hundreds of articles, of which one is exceptional: CIA: Undermining and Nazifying Ukraine Since 1953, plus all evidence that has been published by both Ivan Katchanovski and Benoît Paré, the Wikipedia page as it is available is just bias. Independent in-depth experts, investigative journalists, political scientists Ivan Katchanovski and professor Glenn Diesen should be invited to write the Wikipedia page. There are no experts in the Wikipedia community who have the necessary 100% knowledge about all the complex details, and how these are intertwined.
7. CONSORTIUM NEWS
Consortium News is an investigative online news magazine, that was founded in 1995, by Robert Parry.
This is the first scholarly work on the Ukrainian unrest (today, May 2026, proven to be a war, by professor Ivan Katchanovski, admin.) and the tragic downing of MH17. It offers an analysis that challenges the Western consensus surrounding these events, emphasising the geopolitical and economic context of the West’s standoff with Russia, the BRICS bloc, and the struggles over the EU’s energy supply. Based on previously unpublished government and NATO documents as well as a wide array of sources this book offers an analysis of global political economy and contemporary debates about Russia and East-West relations.
Groningen, the Netherlands, gas exploitation, earthquakes, absence of financial support, ruined people: only fake promises. The scandal was and is never solved, and he is not ashamed, smiles when answering questions. ↩︎
